jimgoose wrote: » Apparently the vessel in question is a real hardarse racing yacht with bugger-all on board, including toilets. They'd better have the power-hoses ready on the other side. :pac::pac::pac:
sk8erboii wrote: » Mate that has nothing to do with what i said
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » Yeah ....unlike going sailing across the atlantic with zero experience as a child.
sk8erboii wrote: » Why are you being obtuse? Just type in ‘Climate change humans’ in JSTOR and you have your results. You’re trying to use pedantry and its exhausting.
sk8erboii wrote: » LOL If people listened to scientists she wouldn’t exist
Tell me how wrote: » If you put the time in to reading and researching topics that you do posting on them without any knowledge, you'd actually probably be very informed.
Subcomandante Marcos wrote: » That would be relevant if the poster was either presenting a thesis or submitting an assignment for grading. The poster is doing neither. The poster is repeating the absolute scientific consensus on climate change and it's anthropogenic causes. There is no more need to provide evidence for this than there is for gravity or a spherical earth. If you want to present credible evidence to the contrary, go ahead. I won't wait for your sketchy science from unqualified people and paid for by oil companies though.
Subcomandante Marcos wrote: » Probably hasn't recieved her comunique on the ministry's position in relation to Greta yet and as such doesn't have irelevant copy and paste spam to throw into the thread.
MarquisDeSad wrote: » You really don't have a clue what your talking about, do you?
Tell me how wrote: » So that's a No then. Cool argument.
sk8erboii wrote: » ‘Please spam the thread with 20,000 studies correlating climate change and humans’ Literally just use JSTOR.
Tell me how wrote: » I don't know just how familiar you are university practices with yourself but it is common that if you make a claim, you produce evidence to support that claim or else it can be deemed to effectively be false and discounted out of hand. Well, at least that was the understanding communicated to me while earning my degrees.
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » Adults should be saving children ....the other way around rarely works out.
markodaly wrote: » There are lots of other figureheads out there but this child is the one that perks interest for some reason.
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » I haven't at all. I have said plainly I attack the people using a child for their own gains. August is hurricane season on the Atlantic by the way. Its not a real racing team its an 'ECO RACING TEAM'. They've never won anything. Its a bunch of aristocrats. Anyway racing teams OFTEN have to be rescued even expert ones. I am surprised they took someone under 18.
One eyed Jack wrote: » To be fair, that whole having one less child would have the greatest impact individuals could make on climate change, was only touted in 2017. Greta was born long before then so while she would have existed, the impetus would be on children now to have no children when they become adults themselves. How many children do you imagine are listening to that message?
sk8erboii wrote: » LOL Nothing backs up climate change. okay got it. Use JSTOR and google scholar to search for studies. Its standard research practice for university. I assume you went there to form your rational stance?
Subcomandante Marcos wrote: » She's sailing across the atlantic with a professional racing team and family members in a state of the art boat. It's not like she pushed off in a dingy. It's almost like you can't rebut her message so you try to attack her and ger family's character and image. That seems to be your modus operandi when you enter debates on the wrong side on these boards...
Subcomandante Marcos wrote: » Judging by the idiocy in this thread your statement is false.
MarquisDeSad wrote: » Some clearly do.
Tell me how wrote: » You don't even understand what is happening do you? Maybe you didn't understand when you signed up to Boards, you don't have to join in to every thread you know.
Tell me how wrote: » Typical, even on an anonymous internet forum you only want to stir the pot and hint at stuff but have nothing to back it up. Not surprising.
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » Better than a 16 yr old with zero experience of yachting who thinks she can sail across the Atlantic. Not exactly savvy or bright is she?
MarquisDeSad wrote: » You.
is_that_so wrote: » No, there'd be another person who could do something similar.
sk8erboii wrote: » Nah. Google it for yourself. I assume you know how to use JSTOR and search for academic studies?
is_that_so wrote: » Who's to say we don't?
