shamrock55 wrote: » Just watching a thing on Dalglish and how he was the first player/manager to lead a team out in fá Cup final, and got me thinking has there ever been another player/manager in the English or any other top flight, didn't seem unusual at the time but it was obviously very rare cos I can't think of any others before or since, I think maybe gullit for Chelsea for a bit but I'm not sure on that
shamrock55 wrote: » Just watching a thing on Dalglish and how he was the first player/manager to lead a team out in fup final, and got me thinking has there ever been another player/manager in the English or any other top flight, didn't seem unusual at the time but it was obviously very rare cos I can't think of any others before or since, I think maybe gullit for Chelsea for a bit but I'm not sure on that
Osmosis Jones wrote: » I think Giggs might have been a player manager for the last month of the season Moyes was fired in.
8-10 wrote: » Gullit & Vialli for Chelsea and Hoddle was player manager too in the 90's - was it at Palace? Edit: Nope, Chelsea also - they loved player-managers in the 90's!
FitzShane wrote: » John Terry took charge of Chelsea for 20 mins in one game that he played in.
gibgodsman wrote: » To be honest its some decent business by Barca, Neymar, while being a twat, has a brand of his own, similar to players like Ronaldo and Messi, while no where near as good, he brings in huge amounts of fans and with that merchandise sales. Rakitic is 31? They already replaced him, Coutinho has never settled, and was going to be sold or loaned out anyway. So 100m plus players leaving anyway, some good business.
Fieldog wrote: » Oh FFS All we need...https://twitter.com/MaddockMirror/status/1161332194645880833?s=20
ERG89 wrote: »
The Good Ole Boys wrote: » What this mean?
Dickerty wrote: » For every person saying "Why are we leaving ourselves short?" there is one saying "Good riddance always injured and error prone" and another saying "The kids can only improve if they get games". As always, I reckon Klopp knows what he's doing...
~Rebel~ wrote: » Honestly think it's a genuinely terrible deal for them... they're effectively spending more than what they got for him a few years ago, and are getting back an older, more troublesome, and constantly injured version. He's spent more than half of his time with PSG out injured - and is still out injured. So at this point in time right now, he's been injured for 9 months straight, after being injured for 6 months straight the previous year. And it's ankle problems too, which are notoriously hard to properly get rid of. Especially for nimble, quick footed players like him, because there's constant pressure put on a tiny area from both his own weight and all the momentum of his speed every time he does a quick movement, which his entire game is based upon. They'd have been far far far better off doing whatever they needed to do to get Mbappe instead. Far more resilient, far younger, equally good.
Agent Coulson wrote: » I think we have come out best of the original Neymar transfer. Neymar to PSG for 220m Barca use 140m of that for Coutinho which Liverpool use to buy the players which turn them into European Champions.
Widdensushi wrote: » who are we going to buy with it ?