Earthhorse wrote: » No?
Noveight wrote: » Was MadsL a Yank who point blank denied they had a gun problem?
anewme wrote: » I had no idea what was a "prison" so I just googled it there. I fhought first it was a forum fir people in The Joy or Wheatfield. I had a quick nosey and for those interested there is a post from KikiLaRue2 about why she was banned.
Jermaine Bitter Saloon wrote: » Is WhiteWashMan still around?
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » ...I'm just trying my hand at humour!
Arghus wrote: » I don't know how you people can seemingly recognise people posting under new names. There's maybe a handful of posters here whose style I'd recognise, but for everyone else I wouldn't have a clue if it was a re-reg.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » You're not alone Arghus, most of us probably don't. If only 1% of us can recognise previous users from their writing style or from their opinions, then all it takes is a nudge for the rest of us to say "oh THAT'S who you are!". There are some people here whom I'd have sworn are new users, and yet when someone points out the obvious, it's immediately clear. Some people, of course, are retained in the memory for all the wrong reasons.
RMAOK wrote: » Flutterinbantam
ToddyDoody wrote: » How come she was banned?
Raconteuse wrote: » I can spot a re reg a mile off. A number of posters being lamented are still here.
Arghus wrote: » Permabear - With his absolutely 100% totally real life.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Arghus wrote: » Permabear - With his absolutely 100% totally real life. My favourite posters were some lads, during the last recession (with total sincerity, by the way) asking if this was a good time to be investing in gold/ monetary metal. The lad spent his time expressing some strange grudge against primary school teachers. Everything he knew about Finance, he'd learned from YouTube. It was a strange time.
Danzy wrote: » Less than pleasant talk about Jews and the holocaust.
Arghus wrote: » A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » You're not alone Arghus, most of us probably don't. If only 1% of us can recognise previous users from their writing style or from their opinions, then all it takes is a nudge for the rest of us to say "oh THAT'S who you are!". There are some people here whom I'd have sworn are new users, and yet when someone points out the obvious, it's immediately clear. Some people, of course, are retained in the memory for all the wrong reasons. I think the only time my spidey sense would start tingling was if someone started going on about their nubile young early twenties wife and their idyllic life of raising half a dozen young children together, while earning big bucks being a shithot financial genius down in a version of The American Deep South that'd be too corny for even the Grand Ole Oprey.
Arghus wrote: » 62 posts? It takes one to know one I guess!
anewme wrote: » The BMI poster had a strange grudge against Primary School teachers too!!!
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » My favourite posters were some lads, during the last recession (with total sincerity, by the way) asking if this was a good time to be investing in gold/ coinage metal. The lad spent his time expressing some strange grudge against primary school teachers. Everything he knew about Finance, he'd learned from YouTube. It was a strange time.
Hammer89 wrote: » I liked a lady called Medusa back in the day. I remember her writing one time that she had some sort of serious health problem, so I'm worried she might've died but I hope not.
Arghus wrote: » The penny finally dropped for me with PB - though it had been miraculously just about defying gravity for an extened period before then - when he started banging on about the greatness of Finnegan's Wake in a thread one time. I don't have a problem with that really, but I just knew, knew, this guy was regurgitating stuff he'd read elsewhere and passing it off as his own opinion. Every cliche in the book, about that book - every hoary one liner used by a lecturer to a room of English undergrads - was used to prop up his argument. On the surface it was all very erudite and knowledgeable, but if you did actually know something about the book you were able to see through his spoofery and quick internet research.
Raconteuse wrote: » Have had a few accounts. It looks flaky for sure but some people read waaaay too much into it - coming to all sorts of conclusions about mental health and so on. It can really be just as simple as wanting to stay off Boards for a while or just feeling like a new account. Boring reasons. .