Bellerstring wrote: » Holy Jaysus. Just Googled Rosebudding!! WTAF
jimgoose wrote: » Didn't that used to be called the "Pink Sock"?
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » I have a friend who used to work in a nursing home when she was a student, she said rectal prolapse is really common when you're old. She used to just go around stuffing anuses back into arseholes like a game of whack-a-mole. I feel like people should be warned about this. Imagine how frightening it must be the first time it happens, maybe doing the groceries or reaching for the kettle and suddenly your innards are chafing off your inside leg.
Cordell wrote: » jfc this was supposed to be about big boobs
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » It's an ad. We should be talking about anything else but that ad.
Homelander wrote: » An ex of mine had really big boobs. Almost disporportionate, think size 10 with GG. It genuinely troubled me to see the utter pain and discomfort it caused her on a constant basis, and she often talked about wanting a reduction but not being able to afford it. Hadn't seen her in a while, met her by chance recently and she'd finally had it done. I genuinely felt happy for her, it must have radically changed her life. Anyway, the funny thing was (and it's not at all funny actually, just more food for thought) she used to be extremely jealous of girls with small chests, even flat ones. As many people often say, boobs are boobs, they're all great. But really spare a thought for the actual problems larger ones cause, they are most definitely not always a positive or wanted thing.
Obvious Desperate Breakfasts wrote: » I bet your ex also got a lot of unwanted attention too because of her boobs.
TheValeyard wrote: » I do like boobs on a woman, preferably two.
Homelander wrote: » Not really. She made every effort to downplay them to be honest.
Obvious Desperate Breakfasts wrote: » If they are as big as you say on a small frame, that would be hard to do.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » It was, Jim. Supposedly very common in the gay community, especially the ‘power bottom’ sorts.
FTA69 wrote: » Ha I remember she used to regularly come to the club I did the door in, she used to be mates with a friend of mine. Nice person but this whole lark about “influencing” drives me around the f*cking bend.
Sinus pain wrote: » Try carrying around big boobs - not fun.
Candie wrote: » I was bemused for a while there (tit-tits?). Then I googled rosebudding, and now I'm completely traumatized.
Homelander wrote: » Jennifer Ellison, never understand how she was a thing at all. Head on her like an undiscovered planet with a composition of 90% makeup.
EmmetSpiceland wrote: » It’s an absolutely ghastly “practice”, C. But it seems to be par for the course with what’s being “consumed” by, mostly, young men these days. It’s almost impossible not to stumble across “inter-familiar” relationships on the sites now. What sort of message is that supposed to be sending?
Candie wrote: » NO. No, no, no. No more icky business, please. /unsubscribes.
Raconteuse wrote: » Jennifer Ellison is extremely pretty
Badly Drunk Boy wrote: » I misread that as "It costs €50 for half (of) a decent bra." A bra is definitely something you can't do by halves.