Donnielighto wrote: » Is that central funding, self generated or both?
Donnielighto wrote: » Did you read the thread, info is a few years out of date acknowledged and I've clarified why is see they aren't dominant now, they are effectively further along than I thought they were.
LeinsterDub wrote: » Fancy having another go at why Dublin aren't dominating Hurling so? Given they've all the same advantages as the footballers?
gormdubhgorm wrote: » Yep 2011 won it against the run of play v Kerry - Kerry pulled up were caught cold momentum shifted 2013 - Although Dublin controlled the game O'Connor's dilly dallying aided Dublin's win 2016 - was delighted with the draw Mayo should defo have won the first game stupid og's keeper mistakes - in the second game Costello won it with his three points from the bench - thought Dublin deserved it 2017 - if O'connor had got his free instead of hitting the post could easily have been a draw I honestly cannot see Dublin dominating in five years time. The quality coming through is just not the same as Fenton, Mannion, McCarthy, Scully, Kilkenny will be in thier 30's - Cluxton will be gone, Rock will likely be gone 34 Nothing lasts forever and all great teams fade.
ToBeFrank123 wrote: » Our grandchildren will have no interest in gaelic football. In fact many Dublin kids today have no interest in gaelic football! Because even they see it as boring and one sided with little competitive interest. The falling attendences and tv audiences support this. The GAA won't be able to give away tickets to Leinster finals in future!
ToBeFrank123 wrote: » I see you've included the absolute sham of a game in Omagh in which Bernard Brogan, O'Gara and Connolly featured to make your case. O'Gara and Brogan are not even squad players any more, at least be honest about that. The game in Omagh was a nothing fixture. I also said clearly the starting forwards in big games these days has no relation to 2011. O'Gara, Brogan, Connolly etc are has beens or no longer starters. Lets see what the starting line up is for the final and compare it to 2011.
Father Hernandez wrote: » Dublin kids today do in fact have interest. According to the Dublin county board, Dublin has grown participation rates in football in the last 10 years by 58%, in hurling it is 98%.
blanch152 wrote: » The bare facts of the issue are this: 10 of the Kerry 26 in 2015 made the squad last Sunday. 18 of the Dublin 26 in 2015 made the squad last Saturday. You can cherrypick all you like, but if you go back to 2011, I think you can compare with the Mayo team from then.https://munster.gaa.ie/event/all-ireland-gaa-football-championship-semi-final/ Hennelly, Vaughan, Aidan O'Shea and Cillian O'Connor are the only starters that day and last Saturday. Again, nothing different or unusual. What is unusual is how close to the 2015 team the current Dublin team is now. It is almost if Gavin hit on a winning combination and stuck to it and kept winning.
ToBeFrank123 wrote: » But registered players are still relatively low compared to Cork for example. 39,000 registered in Dublin to 34,000 in Cork according to most recent stats. There's something like 230,000 kids in Dublin so a vast number don't participate.
Inspector Coptoor wrote: » That’s just central funding. They get €1M a year from AIG as well in sponsorship and that’s just scratching the surface
ClanofLams wrote: » Sorry should have specified. It’s funding for coaching and development
ClanofLams wrote: » Is there any justification for Dublin to receive almost thirteen times what Cork received from ‘07 to ‘18? When the population difference is two and a half times? Work goes in every county to looking after all kids. You seem to be implying that is unique to Dublin or something.
ToBeFrank123 wrote: » But Dublin are winning AIs that's the difference. A poster said Dublins dominance is cyclical, meaning them winning AIs will end soon. It won't. Quoting other counties is irrelevant. There is zero evidence Dublins cycle has peaked and is on the wane. They are dominating now more than ever. So its not cyclical.
blanch152 wrote: » To correct again, it is €800,000.https://www.irishtimes.com/business/media-and-marketing/aig-renews-sponsorship-with-dublin-gaa-in-4m-deal-1.3487922 "The sponsorship will also provide for games development officers in the county who serve local communities, clubs and schools, and funding will be available for club initiatives, including safety equipment for juveniles and education programmes." "“This long-term commitment will allow us plan for the development of our games in the county on a sound financial footing,” he said. “With the backing of AIG, we can look forward to building on the work already being done and continue to invest in allowing as many girls and boys as possible to take part with the guidance of the best coaching.”" All about the kids:)
LeinsterDub wrote: » The gaa is a democracy. This funding was democratically allocated. That's the justification
odyssey06 wrote: » The funding should be spread around. But there are limits to how much it affects results. Or Meath, Derry and Kildare would be twice the teams that Mayo and Tyrone are. And Dublin would have won a hurling all ireland.
ClanofLams wrote: » Dublin hurling has been transformed. They just started at a much lower base, gone from getting beat by Offaly by fifteen points in ‘04 and knocked out by Westmeath in ‘05 to being a serious outfit that narrowly lost to All Ireland finalists Kilkenny this year, defeated Galway, drew with Wexford. Those sort of results were as unlikely fifteen years ago as Dublin winning five in a row.
Bonniedog wrote: » Width of a butt of a goal post between Ryan and a goal that would have beaten the Cats. Would quite possibly have gone on to win the All Ireland...… (Goes to find a quiet corner and weep...)
Mokuba wrote: » It is rotten to the core. Dublin are financially doped up to their eyeballs. No other county has a hope. It'll take decades for the rest to catch up to Dublin, given their other advantages such as sponsorship, population and getting to play almost every game at home. By that point I doubt anyone will care.
odyssey06 wrote: » Not unlikely in the late 80s or early 90s when they reached two leinster finals, losing to Kilkenny by 2 points in one. That was a serious outfit too. There were no second chances back then alas.