nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Silly Irish lass thinks smaller tit-tits are better !

Tikki Wang Wang

Dunno how this reasoning can be condoned. No logic there at all as far as I can see

https://m.independent.ie/style/beauty/body/the-novelty-wore-off-so-quickly-and-i-hated-them-irish-blogger-lisa-jordan-on-having-breast-implants-removed-38393266.html

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

NickNickleby

martingriff wrote: »

Did not actually notice the posters name until now so ya now I get it. Must read better

There were a lot fewer posts when I posted my ,ahem, witticism.

That was how the name caught my eye instantly.

But, in fairness, my humour is a work in progress. Where better to practise it than anonymously on the Internet!!

TheValeyard

I do like boobs on a woman, preferably two.

martingriff

NickNickleby wrote: »

Interesting . My pun on the user name was either funny or it wasn't. I thought it was. You don't. I suggest that is the very definition of 'subjective'.

Did not actually notice the posters name until now so ya now I get it. Must read better

elefant

EmmetSpiceland wrote: »

I was happy enough for that to happen. While I wouldn’t be a fan of the “completely” shaved look, I do feel that the “landing strip” cut was a genius innovation for the “industry”. It also gave a better idea of what was “going on” down there to the “younger reader”.

That’s not to say I don’t “enjoy” looking at older mags, it’s just not my, personal, favourite.

All the quotation marks in posts about historical porn.

What levels of pervy innuendo are we missing out on?

NickNickleby

Sinus pain wrote: »

Try carrying around big boobs - not fun.

NickNickleby wrote: »

let me guess - it causes terrible sinus pain.

martingriff wrote: »

No was never subjective and all that.
I like natural looking breasts

Interesting . My pun on the user name was either funny or it wasn't. I thought it was. You don't. I suggest that is the very definition of 'subjective'.

Church on Tuesday

As a man I find breast implants very off putting, almost on the verge of a deal breaker for me.

I know some women can be insecure about this stuff but in all honesty they are just fine as they are.

EmmetSpiceland

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

80's and earlier was better. less chance of seeing 2 basketballs stuck to a womans chest.

I know exactly what you mean but, for me, that’s exactly what I was after. A big massive set of “knockers”.

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

The 90’s was also the era when the hairy clopper started to disappear.

I was happy enough for that to happen. While I wouldn’t be a fan of the “completely” shaved look, I do feel that the “landing strip” cut was a genius innovation for the “industry”. It also gave a better idea of what was “going on” down there to the “younger reader”.

That’s not to say I don’t “enjoy” looking at older mags, it’s just not my, personal, favourite.

martingriff

NickNickleby wrote: »

Sorry Sinus Pain, my off the cuff response doesn't seem so funny now...(you might well point out that it was NEVER funny, but ..... subjective and all that)

No was never subjective and all that.
I like natural looking breasts

biko

Stop reading rags about celebs = happier life.

JohnnyFlash

EmmetSpiceland wrote: »

Sorry, J, it’s mostly 90’s stuff. What many would consider the “golden age” of big tit “erotica”. It’s mostly American stuff but have some English, German and Italian ones too.

I, also, have issue #61 of “Busty Beauties”, from 2008, which has the, dubious, “honour” of being the first magazine banned in Australia.

Are you a “collector” yourself, J?

Not really, E. I’d have a small collection of ‘bongo periodicals’ from the early to mid 80’s. Moved to England at the time, and it was a golden era for ‘top shelf photography’. Never through them out, as why would you. I’d still get a boner you could run a flag up at Sandra Starks knockers from Juggs 23. Lads these days are all into gonzo porn and rosebudding etc. Not for me.

Cordell

Deebles McBeebles wrote: »

Man seeking woman for fun and maybe more....

Must have basketball chest and hairy clopper.

...and praying that they don't read it the other way around.

Deebles McBeebles

Man seeking woman for fun and maybe more....

Must have basketball chest and hairy clopper.

ohnonotgmail

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

The 90’s was also the era when the hairy clopper started to disappear.

a sad day indeed.

JohnnyFlash

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

80's and earlier was better. less chance of seeing 2 basketballs stuck to a womans chest.

The 90’s was also the era when the hairy clopper started to disappear.

ohnonotgmail

EmmetSpiceland wrote: »

Sorry, J, it’s mostly 90’s stuff. What many would consider the “golden age” of big tit “erotica”. It’s mostly American stuff but have some English, German and Italian ones too.

I, also, have issue #61 of “Busty Beauties”, from 2008, which has the, dubious, “honour” of being the first magazine banned in Australia.

Are you a “collector” yourself, J?

80's and earlier was better. less chance of seeing 2 basketballs stuck to a womans chest.

Cordell

suicide_circus wrote: »

i love all different kinds of boobs

manboobs included?

EmmetSpiceland

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

Which magazines? Any pre-85 Juggs or Razzle?

Sorry, J, it’s mostly 90’s stuff. What many would consider the “golden age” of big tit “erotica”. It’s mostly American stuff but have some English, German and Italian ones too.

I, also, have issue #61 of “Busty Beauties”, from 2008, which has the, dubious, “honour” of being the first magazine banned in Australia.

Are you a “collector” yourself, J?

khalessi

Badly Drunk Boy wrote: »

I misread that as "It costs €50 for half (of) a decent bra." A bra is definitely something you can't do by halves.

So true and you do have to keep abreast of the prices

Badly Drunk Boy

Sinus pain wrote: »

No shoulder and back pain. I have naturally big boobs and hate them. The pains in my shoulders neck and back. I have indents in my shoulders. It costs €50 for a half decent bra. Before and during my period they are so sore. I get it people like big boobs but they do have side effects on the body. If I had the money I would definitely get a reduction.

I misread that as "It costs €50 for half (of) a decent bra." A bra is definitely something you can't do by halves.

JohnnyFlash

EmmetSpiceland wrote: »

Speaking as someone who would always have an “interest” in larger breasts when it comes to tastes in “erotica”.

I’d have a, relatively large, collection of old magazines but I find the idea of dismissing a girl due to having small breasts ridiculous.

My own partner would have a C/D cup size, big but not “huge”. Even if she had A/B it wouldn’t have changed anything.

I, myself, have been with girls who’s breast sizes have ranged from AA to GG and they all have their own “charms”.

Just enjoy it, whatever the size.

Which magazines? Any pre-85 Juggs or Razzle?

Homelander

Jennifer Ellison, never understand how she was a thing at all. Head on her like an undiscovered planet with a composition of 90% makeup.

jimgoose

Wibbs wrote: »

+1. Anything larger than a D does little for me TBH.

Quite. It's all well-and-fine too until gravity starts to have it's wicked and inevitable way. Cheeky little champagne-glasses stay pointing North for longer. :cool::D

Portsalon

"Do I think implants should even be legal? I don’t know" clearly this woman has it all! - small boobs, two sprogs [I wonder whether she breastfed them or are her boobs simply a fashion accessory?] and a depth of intellectual profundity rivalling Socrates and Rene Descartes at their best!

The exciting world of make up artistry is a far poorer place since Lisa Jordan switched to blogging!

EmmetSpiceland

Speaking as someone who would always have an “interest” in larger breasts when it comes to tastes in “erotica”.

I’d have a, relatively large, collection of old magazines but I find the idea of dismissing a girl due to having small breasts ridiculous.

My own partner would have a C/D cup size, big but not “huge”. Even if she had A/B it wouldn’t have changed anything.

I, myself, have been with girls who’s breast sizes have ranged from AA to GG and they all have their own “charms”.

Just enjoy it, whatever the size.

storker

SEPT 23 1989 wrote: »

Said no man ever

Said this one.

nthclare

Matched with her and similar z list celebs on tinder a few times, influencer omg

It's a funny thing tinder, whenever I match with one of these INFLUENCER'S I don't even bother to say hello...

Mum's always told me to stay away from bad influence....

Car99

Lots of Tits on here that don't have a cup size.

NickNickleby

suicide_circus wrote: »

i love all different kinds of boobs

of course... just not on the same chest.

suicide_circus

i love all different kinds of boobs

Spleerbun

Wibbs wrote: »

+1. Anything larger than a D does little for me TBH.

You're not living wibbs mate!