SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » Said no man ever
Wibbs wrote: » +1. Anything larger than a D does little for me TBH.
EmmetSpiceland wrote: » Speaking as someone who would always have an “interest” in larger breasts when it comes to tastes in “erotica”. I’d have a, relatively large, collection of old magazines but I find the idea of dismissing a girl due to having small breasts ridiculous. My own partner would have a C/D cup size, big but not “huge”. Even if she had A/B it wouldn’t have changed anything. I, myself, have been with girls who’s breast sizes have ranged from AA to GG and they all have their own “charms”. Just enjoy it, whatever the size.
Sinus pain wrote: » No shoulder and back pain. I have naturally big boobs and hate them. The pains in my shoulders neck and back. I have indents in my shoulders. It costs €50 for a half decent bra. Before and during my period they are so sore. I get it people like big boobs but they do have side effects on the body. If I had the money I would definitely get a reduction.
Badly Drunk Boy wrote: » I misread that as "It costs €50 for half (of) a decent bra." A bra is definitely something you can't do by halves.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » Which magazines? Any pre-85 Juggs or Razzle?
suicide_circus wrote: » i love all different kinds of boobs
EmmetSpiceland wrote: » Sorry, J, it’s mostly 90’s stuff. What many would consider the “golden age” of big tit “erotica”. It’s mostly American stuff but have some English, German and Italian ones too. I, also, have issue #61 of “Busty Beauties”, from 2008, which has the, dubious, “honour” of being the first magazine banned in Australia. Are you a “collector” yourself, J?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » 80's and earlier was better. less chance of seeing 2 basketballs stuck to a womans chest.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » The 90’s was also the era when the hairy clopper started to disappear.
Deebles McBeebles wrote: » Man seeking woman for fun and maybe more.... Must have basketball chest and hairy clopper.
NickNickleby wrote: » Sorry Sinus Pain, my off the cuff response doesn't seem so funny now...(you might well point out that it was NEVER funny, but ..... subjective and all that)
Sinus pain wrote: » Try carrying around big boobs - not fun.
NickNickleby wrote: » let me guess - it causes terrible sinus pain.
martingriff wrote: » No was never subjective and all that. I like natural looking breasts
EmmetSpiceland wrote: » I was happy enough for that to happen. While I wouldn’t be a fan of the “completely” shaved look, I do feel that the “landing strip” cut was a genius innovation for the “industry”. It also gave a better idea of what was “going on” down there to the “younger reader”. That’s not to say I don’t “enjoy” looking at older mags, it’s just not my, personal, favourite.
NickNickleby wrote: » Interesting . My pun on the user name was either funny or it wasn't. I thought it was. You don't. I suggest that is the very definition of 'subjective'.
martingriff wrote: » Did not actually notice the posters name until now so ya now I get it. Must read better
Big Nasty wrote: » You're on the pull in a bar Two girls walk in One is stunningly beautiful but has a frosty looking face and doesn't smile The other is not half as pretty but has a big wide open smile. She radiates warmth Q - Which one do you try pull? A - The one with the biggest tits
JohnnyFlash wrote: » Not really, E. I’d have a small collection of ‘bongo periodicals’ from the early to mid 80’s. Moved to England at the time, and it was a golden era for ‘top shelf photography’. Never through them out, as why would you. I’d still get a boner you could run a flag up at Sandra Starks knockers from Juggs 23. Lads these days are all into gonzo porn and rosebudding etc. Not for me.
