batgoat wrote: » You're referencing 'The Great Replacement', so I'm doubtful that you're oblivious to other such conspiracies.
Stephen15 wrote: » I suggest you give the Camp of the Saints a read as I've said before. Harrowing that a work of fiction is coming true. Pity some seem intent on using it as a how to guide not a warning.
The Nal wrote: » Looks a bit, err, off, too. Bruise under her eye and her face is losing mobility on the same side side.
batgoat wrote: » Erm, so now you're citing a book that has gained renewed interest as a result of white supremacists...
Stephen15 wrote: » Look to be honest with you I'm sorry to say it but throughout history Europe has always been overwhelmingly predominantly white in the same Africa is predominantly black. I don't have a problem with non white people but I would prefer it would remain. I don't care about America as I'm not from there mass shootings in America have been happening for long time before Trump was elected. I don't think they're really relevant to the discussion. That being said I don't support any sort of violence as I believe peaceful means should be used to achieve change. I don't have a problem with a small degree of immigration through an Australian style points system however I would give first preference to the Ieish disapora, second priority to the citizens of other first world countries and third preference to the rest of the world. Ok I understand some immigrants came to Europe during slavery but that was only in a few cases and a few countries but why are they coming to Ireland we owe them nothing and nor does Italy, Sweden, Germany or Spain.
Overheal wrote: » What is Leish diaspora? And why is preference given to first world countries? And, why in your definition of an immigrant does your definition seem to imply, you know, colored? “Immigrants came to Europe during slavery..”
“Why are they coming to Ireland?” Why do Irish emigrate? Why do they emigrate to the places they do (which is, well, about everywhere)?
Also “first world” ie. NATO countries includes Turkey I don’t know if you wanted to exclude them or what
Stephen15 wrote: » Look to be honest with you I'm sorry to say it but throughout history Europe has always been overwhelmingly predominantly white in the same Africa is predominantly black. I don't have a problem with non white people but I would prefer it would remain. I don't care about America as I'm not from there mass shootings in America have been happening for long time before Trump was elected. I don't think they're really relevant to the discussion. That being said I don't support any sort of violence as I believe peaceful means should be used to achieve change. I don't have a problem with a small degree of immigration through an Australian style points system however I would give first preference to the Irish disapora, second priority to the citizens of other first world countries and third preference to the rest of the world. Ok I understand some immigrants came to Europe during slavery but that was only in a few cases and a few countries but why are they coming to Ireland we owe them nothing and nor does Italy, Sweden, Germany or Spain.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » You possibly don't support violence but you support the theories and beliefs of mass murderers like Anders Behring Breivik, the Christchurch and El Paso murderers.
Stephen15 wrote: » That's like saying to an Irish nationalist you don't support violence but you support theories and beliefs of the IRA terrorists or saying a lefty that they support the theories and beliefs of Antifa or the Red Brigade
ILoveYourVibes wrote: » Whatever your views on immigration there is no excuse for the insanity of Gemma O'Doherty.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » The theories and beliefs you support and repeat are those of far right mass murderers who are white christian supremacists.
Stephen15 wrote: » The way of life in third world countries is very different and very backward compared to our own.
. Unfortunately it's a fact that third world migrants are more likely to commit crime than people from the first world.
Tbh the cost both social and finacial of getting immigrants from third world countries to our culture is a lot higher than immigrants from first world countries who already have similar values to our own. Quite frankly it's not worth the hassle.
My definition of first world would be Europe, Canada, USA, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea and Japan.
Stephen15 wrote: » Typo Irish disapora. Because they can assimulate easier into our culture. The way of life in third world countries is very different and very backward compared to our own. Unfortunately it's a fact that third world migrants are more likely to commit crime than people from the first world. Tbh the cost both social and finacial of getting immigrants from third world countries to our culture is a lot higher than immigrants from first world countries who already have similar values to our own. Quite frankly it's not worth the hassle. Because other countries let in just like we are letting immigrants with ease. If other countries want to stop letting Irish immigrants in and deport them I wouldn't have a problem with that My definition of first world would be Europe, Canada, USA, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea and Japan.
Stephen15 wrote: » My definition of first world would be Europe, Canada, USA, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea and Japan.
francois wrote: » She's gone all out attacking Hazel Chu now, for being a globalist, not to mention thinly disguised attacks on her ethnicity. Anyhow, there is a counter demo Saturday against the crazy one, if anyone is interested.
Stephen15 wrote: » Well I'm able to think critically and agree with and find flaws with certain things. Comparing anti immigration views with mass murderers is like comparing all Muslims with ISIS. The Quran has been used by literally every Islamic terrorist. You can't deny there is replacement migration when Savile Town in England has a 98% Muslim population.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » Thats just silly. Savile Town in England is a tiny fraction of the EU population and it proves nothing that one town has a large Muslim population. Your thinking on issues doesnt come across as critical thinking at all given you refuse to accept your own views are very close to those of extreme far right racists.
Overheal wrote: » Can you expand on this? Like how is Sweden so culturally backward in comparison to Ireland? Sweden is by definition a 3rd World Country.
this is a grand statement and I hope you have grand evidence to support it?
what cost or process of cultural assimilation are you implying?
So, that’s not what First World Countries are. Though again, Turkey has territory in Europe, and that includes many Eastern European countries which quite frankly would be culturally dissimilar to Ireland though I wouldn’t say “backward” (Romania, Poland, Latvia, Ukraine, Belarus) - what would make them easier to assimilate than say, Mexicans, or Brazilians? Heck what makes Korean and Japanese easier to assimilate than South Africans? I went to school in Ennis with a large handful of SA folks I mistook for Brits. I’m just puzzled by your thought process here.
john4321 wrote: » Can I ask again Stephen based on your further comments about first world countries etc. How would you feel for example an Indian doctor in a hospital treating you or a family member?
Stephen15 wrote: » I don't have a problem with a small degree of immigration but only where deemed nessecary
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wc.vanillicon.com/v2/c599644a213e5f18742e0afff85076a6.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://we.vanillicon.com/v2/eaabbaf8a16773590ee22dd6c15f1d68.svg)
