Mickiemcfist wrote: » Fair enough. But that's really that not much driving. Have you got it in sport suspension mode or something?
Wildly Boaring wrote: » Yikes. I actually had a thread on something similarhttps://touch.boards.ie/thread/2057963022/1/#post109628935 Get down to a Volvo garage and see if they've any interest sorting a deal, seems to be the gist of it.
Peatys wrote: » Seats are very uncomfortable for anything longer than an hour, and the suspension is terrible. It's like an old Lincoln town car when you go over speed humps bouncing away.
talkingpj wrote: » Was thinking of getting the skoda superb sportsline on pcp. Thanks for the heads up.
DaveyDave wrote: » Would the half rule not apply here? Being a 191 though I'd imagine it would be expensive. If it doesn't suit your needs, maybe go back to the dealer and work out a deal to get into something that suits you? You wouldn't be the first person to want to change so soon. "If you have paid less than half of the PCP price of the car, you can give the car back, and you will only owe the difference between what you have paid, and half of the price of the car. You do not have to pay half the PCP price to the finance company before you end the agreement under the half rule. However, you will have to pay the difference between the payments you have made to date and half the PCP price." It would sting having to pay 50% of a car in less than a year though, it'd be worth more than that when you hand it back after 3 years I'd imagine.
ELM327 wrote: » The way the majority of PCP deals are constructed, you will not have paid 50% until well into the 3rd year
DaveyDave wrote: » Doing some quick maths on a Sportline with an €11k deposit would mean month 22 or so before it's half paid, handing back now would very costly to have nothing out of it. Doesn't seem like the half rule is very viable for anyone wanting to get out early. Definitely seems trade is the best option.
Toyotafanboi wrote: » Had a look at trading in the Golf the other week. 162 1.6 diesel, 85k kms so has shattered the PCP mileage allowance. Roughly speaking went in with max deposit in 162, €9k ish and have been paying €250pm since then, so again roughly speaking we are 50% of the way to owning the car having paid €14250 off the car. Trade in value allowed was €18750, so €4500 equity which is quite good at this point IMO. To get the exact same car again continuing with PCP using just the equity as deposit was around €460 per month but the price of a comparable Golf has gone up by the guts of €3k.
Toyotafanboi wrote: » Yeah, that's the problem, 390 is still attractive for a new Golf. The 300 is over 3 years. APR is 0% on the new car and 5.9 on the refinancing I think. GMFV is higher on the new car, around 12k as opposed to 9k now. Highline with the R-line kit and leather, good good car and decent spec. I think VW are offering a "purchase contribution" on diesels at the minute so that's helping the figures a bit too. Hard to know. It's the uncertainty of the future really, ideally payments shouldn't be an issue but you never know I suppose. That's the decider really. At present it's a 9k debt costing 300 over 3 years, re-PCP ings would mean in the region off €22k debt and closer to €400 per month for another 3-6 years.
bazz26 wrote: » My main concern would be that your buying a new model now that will be replaced with a brand new model at the end of this year or early next year. This will have a bearing on the value of equity you have in the car in 3 years time.
Lantus wrote: » Car models change nearly every 3 years or so. This loss of equity quoted by so many doesn't seem borne out in reality? Unless there is data to support?
Toyotafanboi wrote: » Yeah, although I was aware a new model was on the way and is probably the reason they were throwing, R-Line, tech pack, leather etc at the car for seemingly little cost, I didn't really consider the implications a newer model would have on any potential repeat equity, especially now the GMFV is higher. I completely agree vintage, it's still a fresh car for not much money to keep the existing car and that was my initial thought process and intention to just refinance at the end, hadn't really any intention of changing. At the same time I've no reason not to change and a change would be nice, which I suppose is how PCP suckers you. Have a bit to think about it seems
CoBo55 wrote: » Toyotafanboi wrote: » Yeah, although I was aware a new model was on the way and is probably the reason they were throwing, R-Line, tech pack, leather etc at the car for seemingly little cost, I didn't really consider the implications a newer model would have on any potential repeat equity, especially now the GMFV is higher. I completely agree vintage, it's still a fresh car for not much money to keep the existing car and that was my initial thought process and intention to just refinance at the end, hadn't really any intention of changing. At the same time I've no reason not to change and a change would be nice, which I suppose is how PCP suckers you. Have a bit to think about it seems I think thats a great deal, if you could throw them a few grand it would lower the payments a bit, as it stands I'd go for it as your 162 will be pushing up to or be past 200,000km in 3 years time with all the potential money problems looming.
GavMan wrote: » I don't really see the concern over residuals. It's a well spec'd R-Line. There is always going to be a reasonably buoyant market for that 2nd hand
CoBo55 wrote: » Does the R line have led headlights or are the led's extra?