SlickRic wrote: » If you think we're not spending because we're simply choosing not to, then indent know what ti tell you. Their owner can plough £1.3bn of his own money into the club, and 'negotiate' massive commercial deals, in order to consistently spend money every single window, without having to sell anyone for any significant money to offset that spend, when every other club in England has to watch their spending in some way. They're playing a different game.
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » Apple Field would be okay, if they give 1 billion a season for players
rob316 wrote: » Honestly I think the fees are getting too big and clubs are struggling to spend this consistently. It's been a very quiet window over all. It's 60m now minimum for a decent international player looking to move to a big club.
~Rebel~ wrote: » Not to mention the ever-increasing wages and agents fees too. TV/streaming rights will keep the good times rolling for another while, but to what end? Like, would the quality or experience be any different if everything was cut down to 10% of its current costs? If wages were 10% of what they are, and fees were 10% of their current values and subsequently tv sub costs were 10% of what they are? It just feels like increase for the sake of increase, and all the while fewer people are actually watching the actual matches because so many of them are spread across so many platforms.Maybe a chancer like Mike Ashley is actually the only sane one, siphoning off every cent he can from the crazy train before it derails.
GBX wrote: » Blast from the past Scott Carson en route to have a medical at City :eek: As back up for for Bravo. Had forgotten about him as an ex player. Certainly dont forsee him getting many games.
We’d been taught a hard lesson about how to win a final. Madrid knew exactly what they were doing. There was no luck involved. Especially after they scored the third goal — we just couldn’t get the ball off them. It was clinical. It was frustrating. It was heartbreaking. But I think it was also a bit of a blessing in disguise. Throughout last season, we did to teams what Madrid had done to us. We closed out matches, won the one-nils and two-nils. We learned from them.
Gbear wrote: » Salah has donated $3m to an Egyptian cancer research charity. Even for a footballer that's a huge wad of cash. Bet he sends half his pay cheque home to his mammy as well. The donation was in the wake of a terrorist attack on their office during the week.
rob316 wrote: » I swear if I could love this squad more I'd marry one of them. It's true what Klopp says he looks for human qualities in players too not just talent. $3m is huge money in fairness.
Dickerty wrote: » That's probably his CL winning bonus and his Top Scorer bonus combined...
rob316 wrote: » Under no obligation to donate a dime, $3m is probably still alot to him.
MD1990 wrote: » I think Keita will play at times on the left in the front. Our central midfield is strong.
Morzadec wrote: » Shaq / Origi / Brewster is just so far off Sane / Jesus / Mahrez in terms of backup.
ballyargus wrote: » It's the fact that we don't have even one Tier 1 player as a rotation/backup option. It's a world of difference
Dickerty wrote: » Or it's 1 point of difference. Didn't get them to back-to-back CL finals, did it?
noodler wrote: » Three trophies. 99 point average last two seasons. Let's not be overly flippant. I really wish we had one real start quality attacker in a similar mould to the front three.