Overheal wrote: » You don’t appear to know what extrapolation is.
listermint wrote: » Ouch. It appears monthly at this stage we have white home grown Americans with legal assault rifles murdering people in family settings at scale. This week in another plot twist... A white young disaffected male uses a legally purchased AK-47 to gun down two children a young man and a woman at a garlic themed food festival. You know an area full of families just out to enjoy a normal day. Despite the fact the festival has had to fence itself off and deploy Xray machines. And despite the fact the officers intercepted the killer within 60 seconds of him starting he still managed to murder 4 people and injure a further 20. Seems like your opening post is a mockery of the reality of living and working in the US . A place where you have to be afraid to send your kids to school. You have to be afraid to fill up with gas and you have to be afraid to go on a family day out to a festival or a concert. Beautiful .... Just beautiful
NKante wrote: » True, but I take the stats from Sep 11 2001. And if we extrapolate to the wider world, some 60 people were murdered by the far right last year - compared to about 18,000 by Islamists.
Overheal wrote: » Since September 12, 2001, it’s not even close.
NKante wrote: » Not since 2000 Black people also commit more murders, but she would never say that.
"We're 210 days into 2019 and there have already been 246 mass shootings," she said in the statement, adding: "This reality is horrifying. It's heartbreaking. And the fact that our nation's leaders continue to fail to protect us should fuel outrage in every American. This must stop — we must stop this."
Franz Von Peppercorn II wrote: » In context her position made sense. She was saying that white nationalists kill more than Muslims in the US, which is true.
notobtuse wrote: » Yes it was from Forbes... (take notice to the map, thank you very much). Perhaps best to do some homework before playing with the big boys.https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2019/04/15/mapping-san-franciscos-human-waste-challenge-132562-case-reports-since-2008/#667182305ea5 So a American business magazine is considered to have a right wing slant? Perhaps, but would that mean anti-business entities are left wing? Viva la socialism, eh?
InTheShadows wrote: » Shocking really. Can only imagine if the roles where reversed and someone like Trump said this about black people. People like Anderson Cooper would be having a stroke live on air as the virtue signaling went into overdrive. Why is racism against white people in open season. Surely all racism is disgusting and to be purged from our society.
Overheal wrote: » No, it’s not from Forbes, it’s from Open The Books, and the source data is not accessible, so there isn’t a readily discernible way to verify all of these incidents don’t include animal feces, for instance. Though since were playing the biased sources game I should point out Forbes has a right wing bent.
Forbes is an American business magazine. Published bi-weekly, it features original articles on finance, industry, investing, and marketing topics. Forbes also reports on related subjects such as technology, communications, science, politics, and law. Its headquarters is located in Jersey City, New Jersey. First issue: September 15, 1917; 101 years ago
splashuum wrote: » In a bizarre statement Ilhan Omar claims Americans should be more fearful of white men. These comment are totally incorrect seeming as the homicide rate committed by black men is soaring. Its frightening to see people gobble up her garbage. I firmly believe she could play a major factor in getting Trump re-elected due to her radical views.https://twitter.com/mollyfprince/status/1154039284950716419
Overheal wrote: » Don’t feed the troll.
circadian wrote: » You've drank the kool aid ya eejit.
TeaBagMania wrote: » Awww you just mad cause i wouldnt drink the kool aid
hetuzozaho wrote: » I'd imagine if he was there we'd have pictures to prove it by now. We might have to file this with the others What an odd thing to say though if he wasn't there. Although it reminds me of that guy from the League who told everyone he was in one of the towers when it happened and continued the lie for years.
Billy Mays wrote: » You're a lost cause
TeaBagMania wrote: » Billy Mays wrote: » Trump claimed he had crews working down there. Surely there's some evidence to back his claims up. You should write Trump a letter and ask him for proof Billy Mays wrote: » He also claimed he saw thousands and thousands of muslims in New Jersey cheering as the towers fell. Do you believe this happened aswell? Yes
Billy Mays wrote: » Trump claimed he had crews working down there. Surely there's some evidence to back his claims up.
Billy Mays wrote: » He also claimed he saw thousands and thousands of muslims in New Jersey cheering as the towers fell. Do you believe this happened aswell?
TeaBagMania wrote: » Im sure the Communist New Network (CNN) has plenty of proof Trump didnt have workers there. Trump employees hundreds in the greater NYC area, could he not have called upon his staff to assist? Nahhh of course not, its easier to call him a racist liar
TeaBagMania wrote: » Billy Mays wrote: » TeaBagMania wrote: » Now if you can find me concrete evidence that Trump had crews of workers working down at ground zero (it shouldn't be hard to find) I'll concede I was wrong. You're the Trump hater why don't you post concrete evidence that he didn't have workers there, shouldn't be to hard find right? Doesn't work like that I'm afraid. Trump claimed he had crews working down there. Surely there's some evidence to back his claims up. He also claimed he saw thousands and thousands of muslims in New Jersey cheering as the towers fell. Do you believe this happened aswell?
Billy Mays wrote: » TeaBagMania wrote: » Now if you can find me concrete evidence that Trump had crews of workers working down at ground zero (it shouldn't be hard to find) I'll concede I was wrong. You're the Trump hater why don't you post concrete evidence that he didn't have workers there, shouldn't be to hard find right?
TeaBagMania wrote: » Now if you can find me concrete evidence that Trump had crews of workers working down at ground zero (it shouldn't be hard to find) I'll concede I was wrong.
Overheal wrote: » You want proof of a negative. Instead, proof he had wieners there?
Franz Von Peppercorn II wrote: » Fixing the tags. As for trump it’s not unlikely he visited ground zero for a few minutes.
Billy Mays wrote: » TeaBagMania wrote: » That's one of the most non relevant "but Clinton or Obama" you've come out with yet. Well done. Now if you can find me concrete evidence that Trump had crews of workers working down at ground zero (it shouldn't be hard to find) I'll concede I was wrong. Just to add, Donald Trump saying so won't suffice
TeaBagMania wrote: » That's one of the most non relevant "but Clinton or Obama" you've come out with yet. Well done. Now if you can find me concrete evidence that Trump had crews of workers working down at ground zero (it shouldn't be hard to find) I'll concede I was wrong. Just to add, Donald Trump saying so won't suffice