deisedude wrote: » The GAA Hour is very good with Wooly Parkinson. Cheddar Plunkett Brian Carroll and JJ Delaney are regular contributors. Much more indepth than other hurling shows
applehunter wrote: » Why was the report on the FAI AGM treated as a big joke by Gavin Cooney? If you are involved in football in Ireland it is a serious issue.
deisedude wrote: » corwill wrote: » Who do you go to for decent hurling analysis in this country? The GAA Hour is very good with Wooly Parkinson. Cheddar Plunkett Brian Carroll and JJ Delaney are regular contributors. Much more indepth than other hurling shows
corwill wrote: » Who do you go to for decent hurling analysis in this country?
Raoul wrote: » Was that SOB also?
StockTwat29 wrote: » I think I remember them mentioning the academy player getting punched, there wasn't a discussion on any of it though, was probably just the headline that was mentioned
Raoul wrote: » Was it covered on Off The Ball? And nope, I don't think it was covered on Second Captains, I don't see why they shouldn't cover it though.
kilns wrote: » To be honest thats not really a sports story just a tabloid outrage story, leave that kind of stuff for Off the Ball to have a crusade against instead
Dots1982 wrote: » If Ken got an interview with Robbie keane and asked him the questions the daily mail journalist did...actually that just wouldn’t happen so interesting he totally defended the right of the journo to ask questions exclusively about singing, Christmas parties and decade old fights with Edgar Davids. Murph’s protestations were batted away and unfortunately he lacked the backbone to fight his corner. Robbie keane always gives the slight impression to me of being a bit of a big time Charlie but couldn’t blame him here.
Trimm Trabb wrote: » Did they cover the Sean O'Brien pub 'incident' at all? They are in an awkward position in that they rely on access to rugby players for their coverage but on the other hand if an Irish soccer player did similar I can only imagine the coverage. Just wondering did I miss any mention of it as I sometimes forward through rugby chat.
corwill wrote: » As bad and all as he was, not as bad as McGrath and O'Cusack on the Sunday Game, talking complete squirt about sweepers. Apparently you're a Tan if you question the efficacy of the sweeper system, according to Donal Og. But yeah, Duignan was as awful as ever. Who do you go to for decent hurling analysis in this country? It feels like everyone who might have something to offer is terrified of being the class swot. Brian Hogan persisting with the auld nonsense that Cody and KK would never stoop so low as to soil themselves with tactics (spit), before giving a fairly detailed tactical breakdown of how he played for KK. Why this pathological horror at the suggestion that a great hurling team would tailor their play to exploit an opponent's weakness? So, so strange.
PhilipsR wrote: » Jesus, Michael Duignan (sp?) says so much but literally says nothing at all.
tomwaits48 wrote: » He's stealing yards, get back, get back, he's stealing yards!!!
Hunky Monster wrote: » I stopped paying when the pods went bad at the start of the summer. Still show in my feed so won’t complain!
Beersmith wrote: » We got a scumbag of the week here
heebusjeebus wrote: » A load of sub dropoffs right at the end of the month. Is that a viable way to get around the subscription? Seems like a lot of work for saving €6.
kippy wrote: » terrydel wrote: » What number have they peaked at? To me that seems quite low, certainly I'd guess its a very low percentage of the people who were downloading prior to them going down a subscription model. Do they fund any of Early's trips abroad for football tournaments or is that paid by his other work? That could be expensive. 100k net is a good salary no doubt, but these days a lot of 9-5ers in IT etc would make that. Wouldnt turn it down myself mind you! 11.4K sub's is as high as I've seen it. There are bound to be costs associated with guests and production etc but even a salary or 70 or 80 k a year producing less than 5 hours of content a week while being your own bosses beats the crap outta any 9-5 IT etc role. Fair play to them.
terrydel wrote: » What number have they peaked at? To me that seems quite low, certainly I'd guess its a very low percentage of the people who were downloading prior to them going down a subscription model. Do they fund any of Early's trips abroad for football tournaments or is that paid by his other work? That could be expensive. 100k net is a good salary no doubt, but these days a lot of 9-5ers in IT etc would make that. Wouldnt turn it down myself mind you!
Cienciano wrote: » Yeah, I used to listen to a smaller podcast and he was always telling people to update their card details. One thing I can say is the money I spend on second captains is money well spent. They have been doing this for so long they have it down to a fine art, but no doubt lots of hours are spent behind the scenes.