nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Gemma O'Doherty and her unicorns

Infernal Racket

I see that Gemma is now mentioning unicorns in almost everything she speaks about. She even thinks the Guards will be riding around on Globalist unicorns very soon and that Avoca woolen mills are trying to indoctrinate children into their new world order by putting colourful stripes on beige jumpers. Does she not have any family or friends at all that might seek the help she needs?

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

[Deleted User]

Are we just listing points that red had run away from and left unaddressed?
Cause there's a couple more still lingering from the whole evil bread deal.

[Deleted User]

recedite wrote: »

The word jihad is nuanced, it does not just mean a soldier (even though she is a trained soldier). Anyone who pledged allegiance to that cause was involved in the jihad.

She went a long way, and went to a lot of trouble, so that she could sign up for the Islamic State. She stuck it out to the bitter end, even after they suffered military defeats and many others had quit.
Even if she never touched a weapon and had some sort of back office job, she is still a jihadi.
As it happens, some people have said she was actually involved in weapons training there, but the jury is still out on that.

You might have missed my question above. I asked if you have any evidence to share - meaning evidence of a crime.

batgoat

recedite wrote: »

The word jihad is nuanced, it does not just mean a soldier (even though she is a trained soldier). Anyone who pledged allegiance to that cause was involved in the jihad.

She went a long way, and went to a lot of trouble, so that she could sign up for the Islamic State. She stuck it out to the bitter end, even after they suffered military defeats and many others had quit.
Even if she never touched a weapon and had some sort of back office job, she is still a jihadi.
As it happens, some people have said she was actually involved in weapons training there, but the jury is still out on that.

Asked a question earlier in the thread and you haven't addressed it. Do you view non white Irish people as Irish or are you obsessed with their bloodline?

recedite

The word jihad is nuanced, it does not just mean a soldier (even though she is a trained soldier). Anyone who pledged allegiance to that cause was involved in the jihad.

She went a long way, and went to a lot of trouble, so that she could sign up for the Islamic State. She stuck it out to the bitter end, even after they suffered military defeats and many others had quit.
Even if she never touched a weapon and had some sort of back office job, she is still a jihadi.
As it happens, some people have said she was actually involved in weapons training there, but the jury is still out on that.

[Deleted User]

recedite wrote: »

This is a joke, right?

Do you have some evidence to share with the class?

recedite

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

There is no evidence that Lisa Smith is or was an ISIS jihadi

This is a joke, right?

batgoat

Stephen15 wrote: »

But your the one who wants returning ISIS jihadis to come to Ireland

I would actually favour letting her in as she remains an Irish citizens. Pursue prosecutions in relation to crimes and work on deradicalising her. Denmark have had success doing so.

Anyway, not remotely comparable to Gemma being banned from YouTube...

[Deleted User]

Stephen15 wrote: »

But your the one who wants returning ISIS jihadis to come to Ireland

So many factual errors in one short sentence;

Lisa Smith is one person, not several persons
There is no evidence that Lisa Smith is or was an ISIS jihadi
Any Irish citizen can enter Ireland at any time, regardless of what crime they may or may not have committed
I didn't say that I wanted Lisa Smith to return to Ireland. I said that if given the slightly nonsensical choice between Lisa and Gemma, I'm with Lisa

If Lisa Smith has committed any crime, then she should be prosecuted and pay the price accordingly. Regardless of whether she did or didn't commit a crime, she, like every other Irish citizen, is entitled to enter Ireland. She's also the mother of a two year old child, who is also an Irish citizen.

But I'm still not getting the rationale for choosing one or other - what's the connection?

Stephen15

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

Fair play to Leo Gerard so for the article - which conclusion did they come to about Gemma?
Obnoxious woman-hating racist that wants to take Ireland back to the 1950s

Scheming manipulative shrew exploiting people who lack the smarts to see through her nonsense for financial gain

But your the one who wants returning ISIS jihadis to come to Ireland

[Deleted User]

recedite wrote: »

You just proved that The Liberal.ie article is 100% correct

Fair play to Leo Gerard so for the article - which conclusion did they come to about Gemma?

Obnoxious woman-hating racist that wants to take Ireland back to the 1950s
Scheming manipulative shrew exploiting people who lack the smarts to see through her nonsense for financial gain

recedite

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

I'll take Lisa thanks - though why would it be an either /or choice?

You just proved that The Liberal.ie article is 100% correct

[Deleted User]

Stephen15 wrote: »

.

Would you rather Lisa Smith came home or Gemma was allowed to continue with her Youtube channel.

I'll take Lisa thanks - though why would it be an either /or choice?

Stephen15

TheRepentent wrote: »

The liberal lol

Stephen please change your sources.

As it stands you'd swallow a brick.

What I clearly stated I don't agree with everything they post but I agree this time. You say I'd swallow a brick but you probably would too if it had Guardian, RTE, Journal.ie or Irish Times written on it unlike you I am not bias about by new sources I will agree with what I agree with and disagree with what I disagree with regardless of news sources.

Would you rather Lisa Smith came home or Gemma was allowed to continue with her Youtube channel.

TheRepentent

Stephen15 wrote: »

I don't always agree with The Liberal.ie but this article is 100% the truth.
https://theliberal.ie/opinion-the-same-people-who-want-to-censor-gemma-odoherty-want-lisa-smith-back-in-ireland/

The liberal lol

Stephen please change your sources.

As it stands you'd swallow a brick.

Battery Power

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

I won't be clicking any Liberal links.

Is that a real person? You know how Leo frequently makes up names for journalists and commenters on his little site (if he's not busy buying large numbers of followers from the phone farms of India and Bangladesh ironically).

In between that and 'phoning people- pretending to be a certified Microsoft technician?

[Deleted User]

Stephen15 wrote: »

Gerard Clarke if you read the top heading

Gerard Clarke seems to do a lot, if not all writing on that site.

Is he anything to Bill Clarke?

[Deleted User]

Stephen15 wrote: »

Gerard Clarke if you read the top heading

I won't be clicking any Liberal links.

Is that a real person? You know how Leo frequently makes up names for journalists and commenters on his little site (if he's not busy buying large numbers of followers from the phone farms of India and Bangladesh ironically).

Stephen15

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

Did Leo steal this article from someone or did he actually write it himself?

Gerard Clarke if you read the top heading

[Deleted User]

Stephen15 wrote: »

I don't always agree with The Liberal.ie but this article is 100% the truth.

Did Leo steal this article from someone or did he actually write it himself?

If I had to choose between Lisa with Sharia law and Gemma jailing media bosses that she disagrees with, I think that I'd probably go with Lisa.

Mind you, I reckon that it might just be possible for Lisa to come home without changing the entire legal system of the county at the same time.

Stephen15

I don't always agree with The Liberal.ie but this article is 100% the truth. The people who agree with the censoring of G'OD like Izzy Kamikaze, Fiona O'Leary, Mark Malone and Leah Doherty would probably support the return of Lisa Smith vut not the reinstatement of Gemmas account and would also sooner live under Sharia law than live under a nationalist patriotic governement.

https://theliberal.ie/opinion-the-same-people-who-want-to-censor-gemma-odoherty-want-lisa-smith-back-in-ireland/

Battery Power

She must be addicted to chemtrails, she gets a good lung-full every day when she spouts her nonsense outside Google Ireland!

Funny how she manages to upload videos every day on her " HEMMA O FOHERTY " YouTube sock channel. Funny how there are links to her online platforms there. Funny how YouTube do nothing about it. Funny how her 'free speech' has been 'denied', yet she uploads freely to YouTube.

Funny.

Again, could this be a publicity stunt with Google's blessing? She's hardly persona non grata on YouTube, and Google are happy to hear her dulcet tones every day, outside their building. Kind of, you know... controlled opposition. I don't know, something just doesn't seem right.

Infernal Racket

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Can admin send him a PM? This could be the boards AMA that we have all been waiting for!

I wont be able to sleep without knowing, I mean, this could literally be everything. It could prove that Gemma indeed is on to something huge. A game changer type of thing.

Timberrrrrrrr

Gerry G wrote: »

We were so close to the truth though. Can you let him back for half an hour maybe?

Can admin send him a PM? This could be the boards AMA that we have all been waiting for!

Infernal Racket

[Deleted User] wrote: »

They've been banned.

Damn, and I thought we were gonna get to the bottom of chemtrails with them!

We were so close to the truth though. Can you let him back for half an hour maybe?

[Deleted User]

recedite wrote: »

Clearly you don't understand your own link. That is from a lefty "think tank" complaining that crimes committed against minorities are treated in exactly the same way as crimes against anyone else. No special treatment.
And IMO that's the way it should be.

It does not say that Ireland lacks hate speech legislation. Nor does it try to invent some difference between "hate speech" and "incitement to hatred".

It's from the Office of Promotion of Migrant Integration, which is part of the Department of Justice - about as far away from a 'lefty think tank' as Atilla the Hun. It's a matter of fact that Ireland lacks hate speech legislation. The Incitement to Hatred legislation is narrow, and specifically only refers to words that 'stir up hatred' - a fairly unusual turn of phrase for legislation. The extremely low number of convictions confirms this.

But if you do need further reading on the topic, work away;

https://www.lawreform.ie/_fileupload/Speeches/SeminarCyberCrime/CyberJenniferSchweppe.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech#Ireland
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/tackling-hate-crime-report-calls-for-specific-legislation-1.3552773
https://www.lawsociety.ie/gazette/Top-Stories/zone-in-on-hate-speech-tipping-point-says-academic/

[Deleted User]

Gerry G wrote: »

No sign of Lufties to come back to us. I'd imagine he's flat out stuffing some commercial plane full of dodgy chemicals which will be sprayed all over us tomorrow morning. Or maybe not

They've been banned.

Damn, and I thought we were gonna get to the bottom of chemtrails with them!

Infernal Racket

No sign of Lufties to come back to us. I'd imagine he's flat out stuffing some commercial plane full of dodgy chemicals which will be sprayed all over us tomorrow morning. Or maybe not

PopePalpatine

A shell company courtesy of Bannon & co., perhaps?

[Deleted User]

I wonder if the taxman would be interested in how she can afford that.

Infernal Racket

batgoat wrote: »

In fairness, O Doherty lives next to Google apparently so no real distance... :P

She has rented an apt there for 4k per month. Nice if you had it