Deebles McBeebles wrote: » I once went out with a girl who only took home 75k and it was terribly awkward when I wanted to head to Monaco for the weekend.
kikilarue2 wrote: » Ah Deebles, I’d have let you treat me!
Ush1 wrote: » I don't "date" people because I'm Irish, not American. You go out for a feckin' drink with them!
Cina wrote: » I couldn't really give a sh*t what someone's earning as long as they actually work hard and make the most of themselves in whatever profession it is they work in or want to work in. The only thing I intently dislike is someone who is lazy and expects everything handed to them, that's the moment you should be worried about earning more than someone.
kikilarue2 wrote: » Right now, I’m in the middle of going solo with a freelance business so I’m not earning a whole lot, but in the last few years I’ve had jobs with good companies and great salaries (up to €75k). In that time I’ve dated bar men and other guys on fairly low wages. It didn’t get serious with any of them, but it did make me feel a little awkward going on dates. Like the guy would want to pay and I don’t want to emasculate him by insisting on paying for myself or both of us, but it also felt ridiculous to let him pay for me when I was earning probably three times what he was. In another instance, I might want to do something a bit pricier but don’t want to suggest it for fear of putting pressure on him. Any other guys and gals been in this situation? How did you feel about it?
kikilarue2 wrote: » One of the few positive cultural imports from the US in recent times has been dating.
Ush1 wrote: » kikilarue2 wrote: » One of the few positive cultural imports from the US in recent times has been dating. Not likely, judging by this thread anyway. Viewed as a f*cked up social/business transaction.
kikilarue2 wrote: » Oh that hasn’t been my experience at all. I’m talking about decent guys who just happen to earn a good bit less.
kikilarue2 wrote: » That’s not how I view dating at all. If you think the old system of “let’s get ****faced, have sex, and make conversation for the first time the next day” was better, good for you.
kikilarue2 wrote: » I think there’s a definite gendered element to it e.g. Guy treats his girl to a weekend away - he’s so romantic, such a good boyfriend. Girl treats her fella to a weekend away - she’s a bit desperate and he’s a chancer/ taking advantage
sportsfan90 wrote: » It wouldn't bother me at all. What would be an issue is if the person I was seeing was completely irresponsible with money. I've seen it with a friend of mine who has to scrape the pennies together at the end of every month trying to pay the bills. That's understandable if she was on a low wage, but she earns good money. She doesn't drive a fancy car, go on expensive holidays, have any savings and she lives with a family member at much subsidised rent than the rest of us pay, so I asked her what exactly does she spend her money on that she's in that position every month. She literally couldn't give me an answer. And this woman is in her early 30's in a responsible job, not a teenager. I know money is for spending but still I couldn't see myself with someone like her. I'd have no issue though with someone who isn't flush with money if she was responsible with what she earns.
Leg End Reject wrote: » The horror!