oxocube wrote: » Whats TRF?
punk_one82 wrote: » I'm trying to source a DJ 36 in an AD in Sydney and I'm told they're even hard to get at the minute. What is the point of AD's if you walk in and their displays are all empty.
893bet wrote: » Blnr jubilee? Well done! You are the exception not the rule. If you get the papers then sell it! I think the market cap is reached. Have a look at TRF sales page. First page of the thread is always flooded with BLNR and HULks
shutup wrote: » Sorry mate, I got 7 thanks including one from forum heavyweight Wibbs. The motion carries! I’m off to buy a seiko
fluffer wrote: » Found it for list at an AD. Will collect it this weekend. I'm not patient but I am resourceful
Rootsblower wrote: » Someone will pay it
shutup wrote: » I wouldn’t spend a grand on a seiko
893bet wrote: » Definite softening on BLNR over last 2 months. Watchfinder tested top of market offering the Jubilee version for 21.6K I believe. Same watch is 19.6K now. Still madness!
Cienciano wrote: » Just imagine 2 nice GS's for the price of a hulk. It's madness.
Faith+1 wrote: » Grand Seiko?
Always Tired wrote: » Do you actually think that's an appropriate analogy in any way? To compare buying a pint that costs fiver, that you can buy on any paved street, that will be consumed in a matter of minutes and is gone, to a watch that you can't get anywhere, that costs 5 figures, that will keep most or possibly increase its value, that can be passed down generations. I get if you don't want to play the little games rich people play but that was just a really daft analogy on many levels. When your target market is people with plenty of dosh, the only way to make them desire your product besides quality and legacy/brand recognition is scarcity. In fact that's how you make sure the ones with the dosh are willing to part with loads of it. They need some kind of challenge! And the shops need to sell more than just the popular watch of the moment to keep afloat im guessing. And you will often get perks for being a regular in a pub ad well! Lock ins, the odd freebie etc.
Wibbs wrote: » Fairly stylish and quirky, but likely to break down at any moment? Sounds about right.
Dante Delicious Magnum wrote: » alfa males
Cienciano wrote: » And they'd be right! As for the porsche analogy, username put it well, imagine the bog standard one going for the same price as the RS. And the green one going for more because green is in fashion at the moment.
Marcusm wrote: » If you think Rolex is nuts, never marry anyone with a Louis Vuitton addiction...
Dante Delicious Magnum wrote: » they see us as stupid sheep following the trends
Wibbs wrote: » The general principles of buying and selling go out the window with certain luxury goods. The customer fighting for the right to buy being one. That's generally in play to help with the rarity idea, but at the moment with the recent demand for Rolex gone mainstream it's gone a bit nuts.
Dante Delicious Magnum wrote: » Firstly I never insulted your dads watches, I did rightly guess that you had not been left watches as you saw no value in them beyond your own death. Good you were waiting in the long grass to attack me rather than the arguement... Secondly worth is always monetary, value is not. And when it comes to discussions on buying Rolex new and used money does come I to it. And the old adage is buy the seller. Thirdly I am not insinuating I will not partake in an interview process to buy unnecessary luxury goods. I am overtly saying it. I will not. If talking money is too crass I would suggest the "how hard is it to get the Rolex you want" thread will anger you.
Wibbs wrote: » Though I would take AD's tales with a pinch of salt.
username?! wrote: » For Porsche, I can understand their business model. You can buy any entry level model with ease, but our "better, more expensive, exclusive" models are only for repeat customers. Rolex has done the opposite here, the "entry level" sports watches are the hardest to find. People are drooling over a SS piece that is worth 8k but ignoring PM pieces that cost 4 times as much.
What they are doing, is making "entry" into the Rolex world harder for the "ordinary person" who wants to buy 1 or 2 watches in their lifetime.
This was "confirmed" to me when I asked the question about the shortage to an AD in Dublin who responded by telling me Rolex are unhappy with the clientele that are purchasing SS models.
Dante Delicious Magnum wrote: » Hey now, hold your outrage and dont quote me out of context, we have fallen out before with you doing that. The suggestion I was countering clearly was that in order for you to be deemed worthy of getting a stupid watch, the person working in the AD is interviewing you and you are licking their arse to ingratiate yourself. They are judging if you are worthy. My point is that these sales people are not in a position to do that (I tried to phrase it more humorously assuming I am dealing with friends here and not the easily offended)
fret_wimp2 wrote: » Wow. whats in the sales mans account is irrelevant. If you think this deeply about all the sales people you deal with, how do you buy anything? I get what the sales guy is doing, he's leveraging his position of relative power in this situation to make extra sales/profits/commission. Making hay and all that. Its annoying, but i can see the angle. If he has a product that is not desirable, we are all not rushing in to offer list price for it, he has to take a hit. But his bank balance has as much to do with this situation as the price of turnips in china, or however the saying goes.