the current and future functionalities of home robots (will) allow them to search, filter, select and purchase various products and services on behalf of their owners. This means that they (will) interfere in the consumer behaviour of their owners by determining the options their owners can choose from. This raises the question whether it is the robot or its owner who makes the decision for purchase.
Fathom wrote: » In addition to killer robots... intelligent digital assistants, home cleaning robots, cooking robots, consumer robots. Skynet sneaks towards control?
Black Swan wrote: » Or to attack in the case of killer robots?
Fathom wrote: » Today. Still have MIM.
Fathom wrote: » Recon?
Black Swan wrote: » Although the US drone shot down by Iran was for "recon" only at the time, it could have also been equipped with AGM-114 Hellfire missiles making it a killer robot too.
SlowBlowin wrote: » A killer robot should be an individual, not cloud based (no instructions rec ivied via communications home). When a recon drone sees and identifies the target by itself, and then an AI decides the best course of action, including engagement, observe, or retreat, then we have a killer robot.
Fathom wrote: » Killer robot differential reproduction
Black Swan wrote: » Will you add Spencer's survival of the fittest killer robot, too?
Fathom wrote: » Have competitions already. From sports to war.
Rubecula wrote: » and sleeping to eating do'nuts pretty please with knobs on
A squirrel was identified as a sea lion and a dragonfly as a manhole cover A mushroom became a pretzel and a bullfrog, a squirrel
Capt'n Midnight wrote: » AI still sucks at visual recognition.
Black Swan wrote: » Makes you wonder about airport facial recognition systems.
Capt'n Midnight wrote: » The only way you could make it easier for the "AI" would be to have a barcode tattooed on your forehead.
Black Swan wrote: » The Robotic Alliance Project. NASA gives an extensive list of competitions.