mcmoustache wrote: » I knew you'd prefer the 25 dollars over 60 dollars. That's just how it is when you support Trump. What's interesting is how far you're willing to go.
RIGOLO wrote: » Thats impressive so your saying among other things that Bush signed off on QE3 in 2012 injecting $40 billion into Wall Street each month, and raising to 80 billion at its peak ... Thats very impressive and here was me thinking Bush was back on his ranch riding his mountain bike around as he liked todo.
Midlife wrote: » Any chance of a source or explanation?
RIGOLO wrote: » yep your right I like TRump he took 5 million people OFF food stamps bringing it to a 10 yer low you like Obama, he added 10 million (14 million added at its peak) people to food stamps . thats okay its a free country , you like leaders who add people to food stamps queues, I like leaders who take them off food stamps queues.
Jamiekelly wrote: » RIGOLO wrote: » yep your right I like TRump he took 5 million people OFF food stamps bringing it to a 10 yer low you like Obama, he added 10 million (14 million added at its peak) people to food stamps . thats okay its a free country , you like leaders who add people to food stamps queues, I like leaders who take them off food stamps queues. The one thing I have noticed with you is almost the ironclad belief that the 2008 financial crash never happened or had no bearing on the economy. I mean, it's very much accepted that poverty levels increased dramatically due to the crash and that explains the increase in food stamp usage and the horrible economy that Obama had to deal with. Yet, you claim it was almost entirely Obama's fault and that he himself "added 10 million people to food stamps" Tell me, what was the name of the President at the time of the crash?
RIGOLO wrote: » Yep Nancy broke House Rules and got a resolution in the History books.. the sort of meaningless thing the left and anti-Trumpers will celebrate. Meawhile this week TRump supporters will celebrate the DOW, S&P and NASDAQ hitting record highs. Thats in the history books too. And Im very confident a booming stock market wins more votes in 2020 than a house resolution.
RIGOLO wrote: » The ISIS caliphate, which TRump inherited from Obama thanks to Obamas disatrous foreign policy has been virtually destroyed orat least reduced to 90% of what it was when he took office. Thats already in the History books. Who can forget when Obama referred to them as the JV of terrorist groups.. junior varsity
Cody montana wrote: » I’m a bigger fool for engaging with you and your sound bites. But America did not defeat isis, a coalition of many countries defeated isis.
Grant Shaggy Self-confidence wrote: » StringerBell wrote: » Happy the symbolic vote passed, as much for how upset the Trumpettes will be and already are about someone just telling it like it is. I guess the phrase suck it up buttercup isn't as popular with them at the minute. Oh all the winning would just wear you out. No wonder he took a break from it after 2016. The newly thought up excuse, the "strategy" isn't going to work and I'd imagine his campaign people will urge him to attack a better line and length, divide of course, be outrageous of course, but he needs to pick a better target, gonna be a tough one for him but with his reality TV nous I won't count him out yet. A racist tough talking yet ultimately cowardly president, offended by every perceived critique, and a fanbase who are equally sensitive if not more, hilarious. Why do you call him cowardly
StringerBell wrote: » Happy the symbolic vote passed, as much for how upset the Trumpettes will be and already are about someone just telling it like it is. I guess the phrase suck it up buttercup isn't as popular with them at the minute. Oh all the winning would just wear you out. No wonder he took a break from it after 2016. The newly thought up excuse, the "strategy" isn't going to work and I'd imagine his campaign people will urge him to attack a better line and length, divide of course, be outrageous of course, but he needs to pick a better target, gonna be a tough one for him but with his reality TV nous I won't count him out yet. A racist tough talking yet ultimately cowardly president, offended by every perceived critique, and a fanbase who are equally sensitive if not more, hilarious.
Carry wrote: » I admire almost all of you discussing even the most ridiculous minutiae of the Trump administration, I certainly respect those who think that a proper political discourse means to try to convince other people to understand your arguments or trying to understand their's. It's pointless. Once brainwashed they stick to their opinion, it's 101 psychology. Trump and the disfunctional administration he created are way beyond any sober discourse among political minded people. Even worse, when I read international news, even beyond the English language reach, I still see journalists grabbling to interpret Trump, to treat him as the president of the US, meaning to take him seriously. I'm sick of it, and I'm fed up with all the distraction discussions on boards o other social media. I'm sure most of you see him for what he is, but there is still the respect for an office that really doesn't exist anymore. Trump is a demented moron, in place of more explicit attributes, he is dangerous not because of his non-existent policies, but because of his personal grievances. That's all what it is about.I'm German, I'm well educated about fascism, probably better than most of you who defend Trump. To put it very simply: Hitler didn't have any well thought-out policies either, he was just a disgruntled old git with a penchant for young submissive and very blonde women and a hatred for people who were, well, "other". What he was good at was firing up hatred among his equally disgruntled followers, dividing the populace and finally killing everyone who didn't love him. But for years everyone was delighted because "the economy was great" again. Until it wasn't, in 1945. Sounds familiar? Maybe the comparison sounds a bit exaggerated to some of you. But I think it's not. Trump should not be interpreted, should not be excused. He should be called out for what he is: A demented danger to the world as long as the executive power of his government refuses to see beyond their partisan interests. Fo all I care the US can go down the sewer of history. But unfortunately they can do (did and still do) a lot of destruction to the whole world we live in.I want Trump gone. And in the most disgraceful way ever. And while I'm at it, I want the US as a "world power" gone. With all their bigotry, hatred and racism.
And while I'm at it, I want the US as a "world power" gone.
RIGOLO wrote: » I expect the irony of saying your well educated on facism and bringing up Hitlers regime of terror , and then wishing that America 'be gone' is lost on an anti-Trumper. Considering America was the nation whose belated entry into WW2 brought about the ultimate demise of Hitler. moving on ... This was the masterpiece of TRumps actions this week, this was why the tweets and press conference were so seismic. They have forced not only Democrats but also anti-TRumpers and liberals to finally pin their true colours to the mast. Just as The Squad have been exposed for their hatred of America and hte Democrat party has chosen to back their hatred of the nation 3 of 4 were born in. The anti-TRumpers are also declaring their hatred for America..
RIGOLO wrote: » I expect the irony of saying your well educated on facism and bringing up Hitlers regime of terror , and then wishing that America 'be gone' is lost on an anti-Trumper. Considering America was the nation whose belated entry into WW2 brought about the ultimate demise of Hitler. moving on ... This was the masterpiece of TRumps actions this week, this was why the tweets and press conference were so seismic.
batgoat wrote: » Also worth noting that much of the work towards defeating ISIS predated Trump's presidency.
Jamiekelly wrote: » The one thing I have noticed with you is almost the ironclad belief that the 2008 financial crash never happened or had no bearing on the economy. I mean, it's very much accepted that poverty levels increased dramatically due to the crash and that explains the increase in food stamp usage and the horrible economy that Obama had to deal with. Yet, you claim it was almost entirely Obama's fault and that he himself "added 10 million people to food stamps" Tell me, what was the name of the President at the time of the crash?
pixelburp wrote: » Your attempt to reframe racist ignorance as some kind of tactical masterpiece marks it as insulting to everyone here trying to debate in good faith. There's a clear lack of Trump sympathetic voices in this thread, but you aren't it. At best his blurting out was accidentally racist, too stupid to realise 3 of the 4 'Squad' were born in the US - at worst he let the mask slip. There is no 4D chess here, no matter how much you want it to be the case. You would call the "Anti-TRumpers" the hysterical ones yet here you are, blathering masterpieces over a clearly racist tweet. Well done. Your fan worship of Trump is frankly makes you intractable, and going by your previous posts pillorying those who don't wear cheap metal pins on their collars as "Anti American", or that those following the American Dream should be mocked, you have no intention on being civil, mature or reasoned. I had you blocked but people insist on replying to your posts, even though it's clear you would rather move the goalposts on racism that admit that Your Man is a poor human being.
Christy42 wrote: » Until they face him down they have to accept that they are supporting racism.
Stallingrad wrote: » Can't ever see this happening, the Cult of Personality effectively ensures there is no Republican party without him. Self interest and fear ensure political paralysis. Impeachment is out for the same reason. 2020 is the only hope of change.
Christy42 wrote: » There is no 4 d chess as you say. Even if there was using and encouraging racism for the sake of staying in power is still just racist. Trump is a racist. He is also the face of the Republican party as it stands. Until they face him down they have to accept that they are supporting racism.
Professor Moriarty wrote: » There was a good point made on this in an article in Reuters today. essentially, Republicans in the Senate and House are terrified of crossing Trump due to his vindictive nature. Apparently, the belief is that he never forgets if you disagree with him and makes sure to tweet negatively about you when he can do the most damage.
Danzy wrote: » Trump's only aim was to force the Democratic Party to get behind the Squad and to make them the face of the Democrats. He has succeeded in that, with just a few tweets. Pelosi must be bucking with anger, she was trying to insulate the party from them, no chance now. It also makes these 4 more important than most of the nominees, the telegenic loony wing, who the electorate really dislike. Biden Harris,Sanders must be raging that so much attention is given to them as well. They know it will cost them votes. Trump will do or say anything to increase the Squads profile and make the Democrats publicly rally around them. This will be the first of many spats he'll engineer between them, the only thing he'll ask is what will get them on the news and raise their profile.
everlast75 wrote: » He has succeeded in unifying the Dems against him. Did you miss the censure from the House yesterday? The Dems debates will start in earnest soon and the attention will be on the candidates. Epstein, Mueller, Stone - all of these things will move matters along very quickly. Don't get me wrong - Fox will fixate as usual on these ladies, but their audience are lost to the voice of reason anyway. A reminder - they are four votes. Only the Trump faithful could equate that to being the "face of the Democrats".
is_that_so wrote: » It's less about their votes and more about how they might be viewed in key battle grounds. They aren't the face of the Dems but they get a lot of attention and suggesting they are is a good political move. Last time people voted for Trump because they disliked him less.
kilns wrote: » But the election really cranks into action will they be though, it will be wall to wall coverage of just say Biden and Trump except on Fox where you will be preaching to converting there anyway
