Balf wrote: » I would have thought this was a call for the crew to make.
https://www.clareecho.ie/shannon-airports-lack-of-marketing-during-irish-open-an-incredible-failure/ Responding to the views expressed, Ms Considine revealed “We would love to have done marketing around The Irish Open but our budgets didn’t allow that”. She added, “We are a commercial business and we have to cut our cloth to measure”.
Balf wrote: » I have to say, I don't really get this comment.I do get that this was delivered to a political gathering. But is the point not that investment in marketing is meant to deliver a commercial return? Is she saying that she'd expect no commercial return? In any event, isn't the Irish Open sponsored by Dubai Duty Free? Would Dubai sponsor the event, and then expect it to be a marketing platform for another airport?
Clareman wrote: » My take on it is that they only have so much money to spend on marketing and the Irish Open wasn't within their budget, as you pointed out the Irish Open was sponsored by the Dubai Duty Free so I'd imagine there wasn't much space for another airport type sponsorship
Clareman wrote: » Could you imagine the negative feedback if the airport had to withdraw or apologize for something they posted, it'd make them look like a 2 bit operation.
mdmix wrote: » i think ms Considine is missing the point, increased funding wont help them market the airport unless they understand how to market the airport. maybe shannon airport marketing team can take leaf out of Cork airports book - https://www.limerickleader.ie/news/home/429134/sponsored-eight-new-routes-out-of-cork-airport-for-summer-2019.html
Balf wrote: » I think you've a point there; I think Knock has equally planted advertising to encourage Galway passengers to choose them, in a context where the alternative would be Shannon. On the Irish Open (because I think the Council meeting just didn't seem to discuss it sensibly), I'd just suspect that Shannon would have to ask who they are targeting. Would they be using the Irish Open to attract airlines to the airport, or passengers to the airport? Is it the right vehicle to connect to folk in US and UK who might use their existing services, or to airlines interested in new routes? I'd suspect it might not be. Dubai is one of the world's busiest airports - nearly 90 million passengers use it, so its three times the traffic of Dublin. So I'd guess any event with a global audience is good for them. Would the same logic add up for Shannon? Maybe not. But should more people be choosing Shannon over other airports? Possibly. But who would they be, and why are they using other services? And, given that several US airlines run (admittedly seasonal) routes out of Shannon, I think its hard to maintain that the airport doesn't have a profile over there.
mdmix wrote: » . . . everyone on both flights was american and over 60, bar 2 or 3 families - this is typical of any flight i have been on from shannon to usa (bar norwegian airlines). to be blunt, shannons demographic is literally dying out
Shannon region to take €58m hit from Boeing 737-Max grounding (Examiner) The worldwide grounding of the Boeing 737-Max aircraft will cost the region served by Shannon Airport €58m this year. That is according to the acting chief executive of the Shannon Group Mary Considine who told a special meeting of Clare County Council that the loss of 120,000 passengers from three services affected by the Boeing Max grounding will end six years of passenger growth at Shannon Airport. The grounding of the Boeing-Max has resulted in the axing of two services by Norwegian Airlines to the US and one Air Canada service to Toronto for 2019.
Ryanair to close some bases due to Boeing 737 MAX delays (RTE) Ryanair warned that it may have to cut and close bases at airports from November until next summer as it said delays to Boeing's B737 MAX aircraft would hit growth rates.
Limpy wrote: » Was there ever a time when all the check-in gates inside the airport were utilised at the same time?. Its always very quite. Will there ever be a time in the future when the airport would be booming? If not what's holding it back.
Brennans Row wrote: » The longer this issue takes to be resolved, the lower the prospects for growth at Shannon.
Brennans Row wrote: » Americans over 60 are not dying out, they remain a growing age group, very active and great spenders.
Phileas Frog wrote: » Unless they have discovered immortality, you'll find that they are dying
huron wrote: » The 737MAX issue and the Ryanair cashflow problem is going to hit Shannon based companies. Ryanair won't have as many planes flying next year because of this. Less planes = less seats = less maintenance = less services, etc.etc. Less seats also = higher prices as demand will outstrip supply.
huron wrote: » I'd love to see Foynes Harbour and Shannon linked physically. A bridge would be ideal. Deepest harbour in Europe in Limerick. Foynes can take the large container ships. Shannon could fly the cargo to anywhere in the world. Plus it would open South West Clare up for development. Places like Kildysert have huge amounts of land that could be available for housing when all it's doing is badly feeding sheep.
RocketRaccoon wrote: » Back in 2006/7 all check in desks would have been in use during the summer.
SNNUS wrote: » I think he means that people over 60 are not dying out and that’s the end of that age group!, people get older ..
mdmix wrote: » more importantly, if the Irish population in the west are not using Shannon. passenger numbers are falling, and this has resulted in cuts to the winter timetable. the airport cannot take it for granted that their existing customer base will rise or even be maintained.
Clareman wrote: » My understanding is that Irish airports aren't allowed actively advertise against each other
Shapey Fiend wrote: » I met a few younger Americans last winter wondered why they picked Ennis for a holiday they said it was cheaper to fly to Clare than to many domestic locations. This was like November though so maybe there were deals. I used work as a Servisair dispatcher in the airport in 2005/2006 the place was jammed with Irish people borrowed up to their eyeballs. Won't see that happen again... hopefully. There weren't that many Americans (exchange rate and September 11 put em off flying to Europe). It was mostly Ryanair, a couple of EasyJet, Aer Lingus and a smattering of Delta/American Airlines, half of which were army flights.
Balf wrote: » Could you elaborate? I mean, negative advertising can be ineffective, so there's reasons for advertising by stating strengths instead of by insulting the competitor. But can you substantiate what it is that limits airport advertising? Because if there's really some binding rules here, they can't be secret. And, so I don't seem disingenuous, my view is that Shannon's existence is pretty well known at this stage, and I'd guess people haven't forgotten it exists. And I'd guess Laois people to be sufficiently aware of their surroundings to know what they find to the East and the West of them. I think the discussion needs to move away from smoke and mirrors, and maybe more directly explore why people don't choose Shannon services when people are totally aware that Shannon exists, and probably well aware that Shannon has a mix of services to the UK and US, with some other routes to European destinations. "Because Laois people don't know where Shannon is, and Shannon is legally required to avoid any suggestion it might be closer than Cork" doesn't persuade me, I'm afraid.
RocketRaccoon wrote: In 2006 there was 2 continental flights, 2 delta flights, us Airways, American Airlines, Air Canada, Air transat. I'm not sure why you think Delta/American were doing military flights but that never has and would never happen. Omni, World and ATA did the troop flights back then. Surely working for servisair you'd have remembered all of them?