marno21 wrote: » The “save R&H Hall” crowd are probably getting mobilized too with the news on Tuesday
sheff_ wrote: » At this rate we’ll be seeing a ‘Save Moore’s Hotel’ campaign whenever plans get released for that development
Roger Hassenforder wrote: » But the only (mildly) intetesting aspect of the sextant is the front angled face and entrance and window (2nd/3rd floor) cornices and eaves. Look at the hideous ground floor windows. jesus wept, no effort. Its such an architecturally significant building it spent some considerable time under a Jameson sign.
hans aus dtschl wrote: » Similarly I believe that the Odlums building facade should be kept. Not sure what will happen with that.
Former Observer wrote: » The ugliest thing in that picture is the brand new Navigation Square building. A woeful combination of bland design with a hideous, decadent cheapo-looking viewing area across the top. Will age poorly. On the other hand, One Albert Quay is an example of a modern office building done right. I maintain that the new developments would benefit greatly from keeping the Sextant as is. Adds character and does not take up too much space. Whether some lad who never gave the Sextant a second thought before and whose friends all drink in Canty's says otherwise is a point of indifference to me. Plenty of people are aware of the Sexton and look favorably on the building, and no amount of historical revisionism will change that.
TheChizler wrote: » Just pointing out that you can't speak for everyone. I made my feelings clear a while back but have been away so couldn't engage much. Always liked that building, disagree that it's architecturally or culturally insignificant, and posted supporting links to the Architectural survey of Ireland, but ultimately if it would be too difficult to integrate into a new development would accept the loss of it. I highly disagree with the sentiment that people are just jumping on the save it bandwagon because they don't like high rise, in some sort of effort to discredit them.
CHealy wrote: » Are you in the 'all of a sudden' crew aswell?
TheChizler wrote: » Speak for yourself!
Former Observer wrote: » You understand that it's the facade that people are discussing right?
Former Observer wrote: » Fascinating.
CHealy wrote: » Because its of zero architectural significance to a brand new rejuvenated area of Cork. Not one person has ever passed the Sextant and thought about its "character".
munstermagic11 wrote: » Exactly. A few friends of mine have gone "Oh no, not the Sextant", but they haven't passed it or gone there in a few years. It's just a pub.
Roger Hassenforder wrote: » In fairness, they're incomparable. One is like a dolls house, a beautiful well preserved, red brick Georgian building with a pub. The other, well, looks like an ugly blue yoke:
munstermagic11 wrote: » A few friends of mine have gone "Oh no, not the Sextant", but they haven't passed it or gone there in a few years.
wrote: It's just a pub.
Captainsatnav wrote: » á la The Ferryman in the IFSC on John Rogerson's Quay. Looks out of place but definitely fits in because of it. Plus it's hopping most days
Black_Knight wrote: » Not to sound like i'm entitled to your free time or anything, but was the Q2 update posted? I've scanned through the last months posts and couldn't see it. Very much appreciate the effort you put into them.
CHealy wrote: » All of a sudden............
Former Observer wrote: » Absolute codswallop. It's a characterful building that has always been admired as such by plenty of people.
snotboogie wrote: » Coming at the end of the month. Pretty decent update this time I think, unlike Q1 where essentially nothing happened. Still no major project started in 2019 though but I think there is a good chance of a massive flurry of activity starting at the end of Q3.
Former Observer wrote: » Why would they not just leave the Sextant as is? Would create a nice bit of character beside the new buildings and hardly taking up loads of space. Could see it being very popular for people working in the new office complexes for a drink after 5.00pm
Apogee wrote: » https://www.eveningecho.ie/corknews/Corks-derelict-sites-are-worth-20-million-ae58db65-ee71-497c-923c-ea557c9800fb-ds Not sure how significant it is, but St Kevin's 14 acre site is no longer listed on Daft or Lisney websites.
Echo wrote: COMMUNITIES in Sunday’s Well and Shanakiel must be consulted if proposals for a large-scale housing project at the landmark St Kevin’s Hospital site are to be successful, it has been warned.The red brick St Kevin’s Hospital, overlooking Lee Rd, is in the ownership of the Land Development Agency after it was put up for sale by the HSE for €2.95m. Details of the deal to acquire the 14-acre site have not been made available.
hans aus dtschl wrote: » To give you even lower hanging fruit, they could build a pathway beside the rail line from the current station to the proposed station location. It would be a 500m walk for you. It would cost very little. It was specifically in the Cork Cycle Network Plan. I won't horrify you with it's specific current status, but let's just say council aren't thinking like that.