cgcsb wrote: » Copenhagen has now achieved 40% of commutes by bike and their infrastructure isn't fancy.
Padraig Mor wrote: » Last I looked (although I acknowledge it's been a while), for all the blather about cycling commute journeys in Copenhagen, their proportion, while doubtless very substantial by most cities' standards, was still lower than that of private cars in the city. Your post also shows the fallacy of comparing City X to City Y etc - having been lucky enough to visit Copenhagen last year (and a very pleasant city it is indeed), it's hardly comparable to Cork in these terms - it's chock full a wide boulevards with plenty of space to put in cycle lanes, with most roads simply having a lot more space available than Cork's boreens. I also believe that Copenhagen has a much greater proportion of people living within the city centre itself than Irish cities, thus making cycle commutes a realistic option for greater numbers. With current demographics, cycling is, and will remain, suitable for a small minority of commuters in Cork. Unfortunately, these people tend to be very vocal and over represented on planning bodies etc. I've said it before - if you want to really tackle commuter car congestion in Cork, put in a 'ring' of park and ride facilities with high quality, frequent public transport into the city - hell, put a Coke bike station at each of them too. THEN we can begin to look at 'stigmatising' car drivers - unfortunately 'the stick' rather than the carrot is the lazy, moribund refrain that we constantly hear from the anti car brigade who are more motivated by their own selfish self interest rather than genuine solutions which would help the entire community.
shnaek wrote: » They also have a driverless metro that runs 24/7 and also runs to the airport. They haven't even managed that in Dublin.
Padraig Mor wrote: » With current demographics, cycling is, and will remain, suitable for a small minority of commuters in Cork. Unfortunately, these people tend to be very vocal and over represented on planning bodies etc. I've said it before - if you want to really tackle commuter car congestion in Cork, put in a 'ring' of park and ride facilities with high quality, frequent public transport into the city - hell, put a Coke bike station at each of them too. THEN we can begin to look at 'stigmatising' car drivers - unfortunately 'the stick' rather than the carrot is the lazy, moribund refrain that we constantly hear from the anti car brigade who are more motivated by their own selfish self interest rather than genuine solutions which would help the entire community.
cgcsb wrote: » Their metro opened in 2002 (one line), their cycling revolution began long before that.
namloc1980 wrote: » If Dunkettle gets shelved, once the O'Flynn development in Glanmire and the tower in Mahon come on stream the tunnel will be utter gridlock.
Planning permission was granted recently by An Bord Pleanala for 608 residential units at Ballinglanna under the Strategic Housing Development provisions of the legislation. A condition of the permission requires a formal legal agreement between Cork County Council and the housing developer (Section 47 agreement). The agreement is to regulate the payment of special contributions towards the cost of the infrastructure now proposed in this Part 8; and addresses the timing of the delivery of the infrastructure via-a-vis the delivery of housing units. Previously, two applications for large scale housing developments at Ballinglanna/Dunkettle were refused planning permission. Critical to the refusal was the lack of adequate road infrastructure. This Part 8 proposal is the culmination of the County Council’s response to address that deficiency. It follows from a traffic modelling exercise and consultation with stakeholders including TII. It has the financial support of government through LIHAF funding and is also underpinned by ABP through the recent planning decision. The delivery of these improvements to the local roads infrastructure is critical to the achievement of the housing development at Ballinglanna (and will facilitate future housing on zoned land at Dunkettle).
Limerick74 wrote: » @corkcitycouncil: The Wilton Corridor project is deemed to be of the highest priority due to its potential to remove traffic blockages, support sustainable travel, reduce journey times & improve safety. It is considered to be critically important for access between the centre & key destinations https://twitter.com/corkcitycouncil/status/1147100823517892609/photo/1
hans aus dtschl wrote: » Council's going to have to love-bomb those residents. It's that or restrict motorists on that road (one way, etc) which I don't think is possible right now.
Markcheese wrote: » Is the wilton Road expansion actually going to help public transport and bike lanes, or just going to encourage more cars to use the road.. (to my mind the quicker they make it part of a proper Brt line from Kent Station to ballincolig the better) (and if put another quality bus route with park and rides from Douglas through the city to the North side all the better)
who_me wrote: » Might be a daft proposal... but given some obvious bottlenecks in Cork city (Douglas is a very obvious one, probably Wilton too) is there a case for combining the inner-city legs of bus routes, then change buses for the outer/suburban route? It avoids having multiple routes needlessly running along the same route into town? So currently - you have 207,216, 220, 223 (others?) all running along the Douglas Rd. into town. Causing traffic problems. People are watching the other (often half empty) buses pass by while waiting for the one they want, which will likely be running late due to traffic. Instead: one route that runs from city centre to Douglas, double-deckers only. If you're going to/from (or past/through) Douglas, you use this. Reach Douglas, and you change to a shorter-route shuttles that run between Douglas and Mount Oval, Carrigaline, Donnybrook etc. Less congestion on the inner-city routes. Higher frequency of buses (since every bus is "your" bus). Outer-city routes not delayed by inner-city leg congestion. (Obvious downsides: having to change bus, especially in poor weather. On the 220 from Carrigaline to Ballincollig, you might have to swap buses twice, at Douglas and Wilton(?) ) Has it been considered? Rejected?
opus wrote: » Guessing this is to give the Millerd St apartment development an entrance onto Henry St.
Roger Hassenforder wrote: » Make it 24 hours and enforce the fcuk out of it
MrDerp wrote: » None of the locals I spoke to cycled for anything other than minimizing commute time.
munstermagic11 wrote: » Who’s gonna enforce it? Same issue I had with Patrick’s St ban, you have to have enforcement. Camera system? But there on the Pats St ban thread it was mentioned there was issues with implementing such a system.
snotboogie wrote: » Farranlea Rd student apartments look to be starting in the next week or so
mean gene wrote: » Regarding the wilton saga which I fully support the residents - will they get money for losing half their gardens or what. Also what happens if they won't allow them take it
normanbond wrote: » What is the proposal for Victoria Cross Road? All this talk about widening Wilton Road is crazy ..... All they’ll be doing is kicking the can down the road onto VCR as that bottleneck really needs to be sorted first!!
Limerick74 wrote: » @corkcitycouncil: Wilton bus corridor Part 8 project voted down by Elected Members: 16 no vs. 8 yes.. #corkcc