Jeffrey Epstein arrested on sex trafficking charges

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Was a typo meant to say bad move. No need to be thanking such rubbish questions was my point. He let himself down.

Fair enough. I can move on, myself.

mcmoustache wrote: »

Whatever about the Trump/Clinton stuff, among the items seized from Epstein was a safe containing labelled CDs - that doesn't include all the suggestive kiddie nudes.

Any ideas about what they might contain? These were brought up at the trial so I doubt they were business or accounting records or anything like that.

I doubt it's porn as 700MB would probably only give you 10 minutes of 1080p porn. Speculation on line is that it's compromising information on others.

He only needs a few minutes or even seconds to compromise people.

Eric Cartman wrote: »

there was no fbi appeal to come forward in 2016 or even 2015 though, there was one in 2008 the first time epstein was on the radar.

I think many would be surprised. Donald barred epstein for such behaviour in 2000 , in 2002 he made reference to epstein enjoying 'younger women'

One incorrectly filed court filing and a photo of them taken before trump discovered what epstein was doing (which he was barred for) is all anyone has linking him.

You might have a point actually. The timing is suspish. Let’s see what happens.

dudara wrote: »

Can you explain what you mean by the part in bold above?

dudara

Was a typo meant to say bad move. No need to be thanking such rubbish questions was my point. He let himself down.

Harvey Weinstein

mcmoustache wrote: »

Whatever about the Trump/Clinton stuff, among the items seized from Epstein was a safe containing labelled CDs - that doesn't include all the suggestive kiddie nudes.

Any ideas about what they might contain? These were brought up at the trial so I doubt they were business or accounting records or anything like that.

I doubt it's porn as 700MB would probably only give you 10 minutes of 1080p porn. Speculation on line is that it's compromising information on others.

Supposedly for blackmail.
As in do us this political favour or we release the tapes.
It's likely that Epstein was working for others, who those others are is anyone's guess.

dudara

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Never get into an argument with idiots is what they say, you thanking a post that tries to link anyone who prefers Trump to Hilary as a pedo/rapist says it all. Bad move on your part.

Can you explain what you mean by the part in bold above?

dudara

pure.conya

Eric Cartman wrote: »

if its being burned to cd's it likely predates 1080p , could be his awful back catalogue.

then surely he'd have dvds for video

Eric Cartman wrote: »

if its being burned to cd's it likely predates 1080p , could be his awful back catalogue.

He's supposed to have recorded all his guests and blackmailed them afterwards. Would be some cd collection if he's still got it.

Obvious Desperate Breakfasts

secondrowgal wrote: »

I have one question for the Trump apologisers and supporters on here:

If you had a 13 year old daughter, would you let her go to a one of Epstein's parties, and I mean without you or any family member? Yes or no answers only please.

Franz Von Peppercorn II wrote: »

You calling me an idiot? And a threat?

Might be a report on the way.

That's your thanks to that post on the bottom of it, report away. Lol your offended, typical from the left.

Franz Von Peppercorn II wrote: »

Might be interesting how this plays out. My cynical feeling is that if you have enough political clout across both sides of the aisle things get buried.

Honestly. This is it. I’m looking on with my eyelids at half mast.

mcmoustache wrote: »

Whatever about the Trump/Clinton stuff, among the items seized from Epstein was a safe containing labelled CDs - that doesn't include all the suggestive kiddie nudes.

Any ideas about what they might contain? These were brought up at the trial so I doubt they were business or accounting records or anything like that.

I doubt it's porn as 700MB would probably only give you 10 minutes of 1080p porn. Speculation on line is that it's compromising information on others.

if its being burned to cd's it likely predates 1080p , could be his awful back catalogue.

mcmoustache

Whatever about the Trump/Clinton stuff, among the items seized from Epstein was a safe containing labelled CDs - that doesn't include all the suggestive kiddie nudes.

Any ideas about what they might contain? These were brought up at the trial so I doubt they were business or accounting records or anything like that.

I doubt it's porn as 700MB would probably only give you 10 minutes of 1080p porn. Speculation on line is that it's compromising information on others.

Boggles wrote: »

Would you be?

Yes. Leaving out the alegations by over age women, considering past behaviour towards epstein and the things trump has said about him, the island etc.. I don't think for one second in this isolated case of epstein, his paedophile island, lolita express etc... that Donny has anything to do with it.

volchitsa

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Your a man and never in your entire life the whole way through school, work, retirement have you ever heard any crude/boisterous talk about women or men if your a woman.

Are you saying that all men talk like that about women or that all men will have heard some men talk like that about women?

Because if it's the first, I don't believe you, and if the second, well what does that say about the men who talk like that when other men would not do so?

(FWIW I'm a woman and I've never heard a woman boasting about regularly grabbing random men by the genitals. Not even when drunk. Maybe I've had a very sheltered upbringing.)

Boggles

Eric Cartman wrote: »

I think many would be surprised.

Would you be?

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Never get into an argument with idiots is what they say, you thanking a post that tries to link anyone who prefers Trump to Hilary as a pedo/rapist says it all. Bad move on your part.

You calling me an idiot? And a threat?

Might be a report on the way.

I’m actually, given that I live in Ireland, non partisan on this. If Clinton is convicted, to jail with him. Prince Andrew , to jail with him. If it’s possible to extradite. And if trump is guilty. To jail with him.

(Also what post called anybody who prefers trump a rapist? I’ve looked through my thanks and I can’t see it).

Guy:Incognito

jobless wrote: »

i dont see any play button on this

I havnt listened through the website tbh. I use pocket casts for them.

Just figured directing people to the website would give the relevant info.

Boggles wrote: »

Well the FBI are encouraging her or anyone else who might have been abused to call. Might be her chance if she is in fact legitimate. Maybe they have all ready contacted her, who knows.

But let's be honest, I don't think there would be one person on the planet who would be surprised if it were indeed true.

there was no fbi appeal to come forward in 2016 or even 2015 though, there was one in 2008 the first time epstein was on the radar.

I think many would be surprised. Donald barred epstein for such behaviour in 2000 , in 2002 he made reference to epstein enjoying 'younger women'

One incorrectly filed court filing and a photo of them taken before trump discovered what epstein was doing (which he was barred for) is all anyone has linking him.

Franz Von Peppercorn II wrote: »

You’ve gone cold on these investigations during this thread for some reason.

Never get into an argument with idiots is what they say, you thanking a post that tries to link anyone who prefers Trump to Hilary as a pedo/rapist says it all. Bad move on your part.

Boggles

Eric Cartman wrote: »

Ok then , well leaving that out the complaint was filed incorrectly in 2016 and not re-filed and never filed any time before he was running for elsction despite the accusations relating to 1994. What are the odds of all of that coming together.

Well the FBI are encouraging her or anyone else who might have been abused to call. Might be her chance if she is in fact legitimate. Maybe they have all ready contacted her, who knows.

Prosecutors encouraged anyone who thought they had been a victim of Epstein or had any information about his alleged crimes to call 1-800-CALL-FBI

But let's be honest, I don't think there would be one person on the planet who would be surprised if it were indeed true.

notobtuse

Boggles wrote: »

The head prosecutor is a republican who was put in place by Trumps administration.

Maybe just maybe they have arrested a serial sex offender and they want him to pay for his crimes.

No tinfoil needed.

Also of interesting note... Maurene Comey, daughter of former FBI Director James Comey, is reported as being one of the prosecutors in the new criminal case against Epstein. Hopefully she has more morals than her father.

Also of note, Christine Pelosi, the daughter of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had an interesting tweet…“This Epstein case is horrific and the young women deserve justice. It is quite likely that some of our faves are implicated but we must follow the facts and let the chips fall where they may – whether on Republicans or Democrats”

Cody montana wrote: »

I repeat, it’s assault.

and your still wrong. How do you think your here in the first place.

Franz Von Peppercorn II wrote: »

Bit of a stretch there Eric.

Ok then , well leaving that out the complaint was filed incorrectly in 2016 and not re-filed and never filed any time before he was running for elsction despite the accusations relating to 1994. What are the odds of all of that coming together.

Eric Cartman wrote: »

Im accusing the democrats or somebody else with an interest in linking trump to epstein offered money to somebody to put their name to a court filing with the promise that theyd never have to get to the court and couldnt be done for perjury because it would never be heard and you cant be done for libel for a court filing.

If the accuser and witness really wanted him done it would have been filed correctly or even refiled correctly after all this time.

Bit of a stretch there Eric.

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Of course it can only be a yes, any trump supporter would. What an odd question I assumed you already knew Trump supporter = Peso rapist without needing to ask.

Will you be taking your daughter over to Bill and Hillary's for afternoon Tea.

I don't know what you were trying to prove with your question only that you've been brainwashed by the Irish media.

You’ve gone cold on these investigations during this thread for some reason.

Cody montana

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Your a man and never in your entire life the whole way through school, work, retirement have you ever heard any crude/boisterous talk about women or men if your a woman. I'm going to assume you've never seen Eddie Murphy or Tommy Tiernan either.
Not even different circles, different planet.
I took it for what it was, locker room talk. Don't fall off that horse.
You do know he was kissing her tits when he grabbed her, that's allowed.

I repeat, it’s assault.

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

but you have commented on it. YOu accused her of lying. Are you accusing her witnesses of lying, including somebody who worked for epstein recruiting girls?

Im accusing the democrats or somebody else with an interest in linking trump to epstein offered money to somebody to put their name to a court filing with the promise that theyd never have to get to the court and couldnt be done for perjury because it would never be heard and you cant be done for libel for a court filing.

If the accuser and witness really wanted him done it would have been filed correctly or even refiled correctly after all this time.

ohnonotgmail

Eric Cartman wrote: »

Nobody said that. Nobody said he’s my hero, just if this epstein trump story is true, trumps actions against epstein and this shambles of a court filing really arent making sense. Im not commenting on any other case as this is an epstein thread

but you have commented on it. YOu accused her of lying. Are you accusing her witnesses of lying, including somebody who worked for epstein recruiting girls?