drunkmonkey wrote: » Of course it can only be a yes, any trump supporter would. What an odd question I assumed you already knew Trump supporter = Peso rapist without needing to ask. Will you be taking your daughter over to Bill and Hillary's for afternoon Tea. I don't know what you were trying to prove with your question only that you've been brainwashed by the Irish media.
Eric Cartman wrote: » Im accusing the democrats or somebody else with an interest in linking trump to epstein offered money to somebody to put their name to a court filing with the promise that theyd never have to get to the court and couldnt be done for perjury because it would never be heard and you cant be done for libel for a court filing. If the accuser and witness really wanted him done it would have been filed correctly or even refiled correctly after all this time.
Franz Von Peppercorn II wrote: » Bit of a stretch there Eric.
Cody montana wrote: » I repeat, it’s assault.
Boggles wrote: » The head prosecutor is a republican who was put in place by Trumps administration. Maybe just maybe they have arrested a serial sex offender and they want him to pay for his crimes. No tinfoil needed.
Eric Cartman wrote: » Ok then , well leaving that out the complaint was filed incorrectly in 2016 and not re-filed and never filed any time before he was running for elsction despite the accusations relating to 1994. What are the odds of all of that coming together.
Prosecutors encouraged anyone who thought they had been a victim of Epstein or had any information about his alleged crimes to call 1-800-CALL-FBI
Franz Von Peppercorn II wrote: » You’ve gone cold on these investigations during this thread for some reason.
Boggles wrote: » Well the FBI are encouraging her or anyone else who might have been abused to call. Might be her chance if she is in fact legitimate. Maybe they have all ready contacted her, who knows. But let's be honest, I don't think there would be one person on the planet who would be surprised if it were indeed true.
jobless wrote: » i dont see any play button on this
drunkmonkey wrote: » Never get into an argument with idiots is what they say, you thanking a post that tries to link anyone who prefers Trump to Hilary as a pedo/rapist says it all. Bad move on your part.
Eric Cartman wrote: » I think many would be surprised.
drunkmonkey wrote: » Your a man and never in your entire life the whole way through school, work, retirement have you ever heard any crude/boisterous talk about women or men if your a woman.
Boggles wrote: » Would you be?
mcmoustache wrote: » Whatever about the Trump/Clinton stuff, among the items seized from Epstein was a safe containing labelled CDs - that doesn't include all the suggestive kiddie nudes. Any ideas about what they might contain? These were brought up at the trial so I doubt they were business or accounting records or anything like that. I doubt it's porn as 700MB would probably only give you 10 minutes of 1080p porn. Speculation on line is that it's compromising information on others.
Franz Von Peppercorn II wrote: » Might be interesting how this plays out. My cynical feeling is that if you have enough political clout across both sides of the aisle things get buried.
secondrowgal wrote: » I have one question for the Trump apologisers and supporters on here: If you had a 13 year old daughter, would you let her go to a one of Epstein's parties, and I mean without you or any family member? Yes or no answers only please.
Franz Von Peppercorn II wrote: » You calling me an idiot? And a threat? Might be a report on the way.
Eric Cartman wrote: » if its being burned to cd's it likely predates 1080p , could be his awful back catalogue.
dudara wrote: » Can you explain what you mean by the part in bold above? dudara
Eric Cartman wrote: » there was no fbi appeal to come forward in 2016 or even 2015 though, there was one in 2008 the first time epstein was on the radar. I think many would be surprised. Donald barred epstein for such behaviour in 2000 , in 2002 he made reference to epstein enjoying 'younger women' One incorrectly filed court filing and a photo of them taken before trump discovered what epstein was doing (which he was barred for) is all anyone has linking him.
drunkmonkey wrote: » Was a typo meant to say bad move. No need to be thanking such rubbish questions was my point. He let himself down.
Franz Von Peppercorn II wrote: » Fair enough. I can move on, myself.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » what makes you think it was filed incorrectly?
Eric Cartman wrote: » the award asked for is 100 million dollars and its filed in the district court which deals with awards that are 1% of that and below. It should be filed to the california superior court at minimum, if not the supreme court.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » i'll assume you haven't read what i linked to and leave you to your conspiracy.
