ohnonotgmail wrote: » my links discusses that court document and also has video testimony.
drunkmonkey wrote: » Yea I'd take he's musings on Trump with a large pinch of salt. This is the author of that article by the way.https://images.app.goo.gl/2KPDzW1ETddKiSWb6
drunkmonkey wrote: » I don't believe it. There's nothing those wicked Clintons wouldn't try to protect themselves including pushing someone to make fake claims. We hear how easy it is to do every day here, there's no punishment for making false claims. That looks like it was filed in 2016, didn't the democrats try the same stunt with Comey. Comeys daughter is one of the prosecutors in the new case by the way.
Franz Von Peppercorn II wrote: » So you accept any claim against democrats but none against trump? Everybody on this list needs investigation.
drunkmonkey wrote: » Your not getting that Trump is part of the prosecutions case and was thanked public on TV for his assistance, he's not on the defence, he already gave information he had a few years ago when they were trying to take Epstein down. That information he gave may be revealed in these documents, I'm not sure.
Cody montana wrote: » What the hell has that to do with anything?
drunkmonkey wrote: » There using the musings of a trump hating democratic school kid to imply the president raped 12 and 13 year olds repeatedly. Paper never refused ink, democrats just trying every dirty trick in the book. Why did she wait until he was president, I think she a liar. We'll find out at some stage I presume. That's 2 author saying her case matches some articles is pure bull, of course it matches seen as she probably read them.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » these documents relate to cases filed against trump AFTER epsteins sweetheart deal.
Franz Von Peppercorn II wrote: » Remember he was an acquaintance of Trrump, Prince Andrew and others.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » so you haven't even read it but you already assume she is a liar?
drunkmonkey wrote: » Why did she wait until he was president
Cody montana wrote: » Talk about double standards.
Cody montana wrote: » I believe her. Trump already admitted on tape to groping woman. Hopefully all will be revealed.
auspicious wrote: » So all those nut job conspiracy theorists raving about pizzagate a couple of years back were entirely wrong...?
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » This whole episode had the potential to expose both high profile Democrats and Republicans, from Clinton to Trump. Who is responsible for the arrest of Epstein? Who ever it is, he's going rouge. Too many people with a lot to lose, he'll be put in his box very fast I'd imagine. This will go no where.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Nothing new here, these kind of stories i read years ago on conspiracy forums. Allegations there was sex trafficking rings for the rich and famous. I not one bit shocked by this at all..Of course the Skeptics attacked people online for talking about it and were saying it all unfounded conspiracy junk. Pizzagate is a separate story to this. There was odd messages found in John Podesta leaked emails, and some people believe the messages contained coded messages about child molestion and human trafficking? I read some of those messages in the Podesta emails and they are definately odd and weird and out of place and never fully explained satifactory. It was then alleged John Podesta and others raped young underage kids at a Pizza place in Washington DC, this is unproven allegation and no evidence found. We still need to separate the two stories from each other though. Still there is undeniable facts- Bill Clinton and John Podesta are close friends and allegations exist both men were involved in underrage sex rings. We have to wait and see how this plays out.
drunkmonkey wrote: » You mean grab her by the pussy while chatting to other blokes. Burn him at the stake, sweet Jesus have you never had a private conversation with other men that's assuming you are one. Women are well able to chat about guys too.
Harvey Weinstein wrote: » If you really look into Pizzagate then it becomes obvious that there seems to be something to it. Most people (the types who dismiss it) rely on second hand information from liberal media outlets and thus don't really know anything about it.
mcmoustache wrote: » Plenty of idiots have said exactly those words - "If you look into it then it becomes obvious that there's something there". If you mean, that elites have been diddling kids for years, then sure. That sort of thing has happened and been reported. If you mean the actual claims of actual Pizzagate, then that turned out to be horse-shít and most of its marks have moved on to QAnon at this stage. The central claim was that diddling was going on in the basement of a pizza restaurant that didn't have a basement. If that doesn't raise a red flag for you, I don't know what to say.
