Dial Hard wrote: » In my experience, they ring with good news, email the bad.
LollipopJimmy wrote: » If any of my team ever rejected a candidate by email I would take them outside and shoot them
The Young Wan wrote: » Have a call scheduled this evening with a company I've interviewed with last month. Today is my birthday so I'm rather worried bad news would put a dampner on it. From previous correspondence with the company, I believe they've made their decision.
Dial Hard wrote: In my experience, they ring with good news, email the bad.
LollipopJimmy wrote: If any of my team ever rejected a candidate by email I would take them outside and shoot them
LollipopJimmy wrote: » It could be anything, offer, rejection or even an invitation to another step in the process. Either way I wouldn't be worried about it. If it's a rejection then at least you'll know and if it's anything else you're in with a shout. Happy Birthday! If any of my team ever rejected a candidate by email I would take them outside and shoot them
The Young Wan wrote: » I've had rejections by email, and TBH would prefer it that way. It gives you time to compose yourself and take the news in, which a call doesn't
Tazzimus wrote: » At least they reply to rejections. I've got a good few where I just never heard back after the interview from the recruiters. Quick email or phone call isn't that difficult.
OMM 0000 wrote: » A scheduled phone call would make me think follow up interview by phone.
Turquoise Hexagon Sun wrote: » I had an interview a few months ago and I didn't get it but they gave me lots of valuable feedback over the phone. Basically, I lost out to someone more experienced but it was refreshing to get feedback. I really felt that company cared. It was a publishing company.
Dial Hard wrote: » Then you are very, very much in the minority. I'm genuinely trying to think of a single time I was phoned with a rejection and I actually can't. And I spent a period of time unemployed in 2017 and did a lot of interviews in that time. These were generally direct with the employer as opposed to through a recruiter, though, so maybe therein lies the difference?
Gimme A Pound wrote: » Crikey. Obviously I know it's not literal but what is so terrible about an email confirming this? What's the point in phoning? Waste of time and an awkward conversation - for both parties. Nobody should feel bad for a candidate not getting a job. An email with an offer of feedback by phone if the candidate wants to give them a call seems like a perfectly fair approach.
Gimme A Pound wrote: » Personally I prefer email. A phone call is associated far more with being successful, so the disappointment would be magnified.
Tazzimus wrote: » I just prefer being told, instead of left guessing. It's that little touch that would make me reply to the recruiters mail with a different job, or take their call again. In my experience, there's very few decent recruitment companies, most are cowboys just chasing numbers.
LollipopJimmy wrote: » Gimme A Pound wrote: » Personally I prefer email. A phone call is associated far more with being successful, so the disappointment would be magnified. I suppose there is context too, as the recruiter I am not the final decision maker, I will have managed expectations and tell candidates to expect a call with any news I get, good, bad, indifferent or even if I have no update. We are experienced enough to know how to handle the situation
JeffKenna wrote: » Ah hold on now, we're comparing apples with oranges here. If a recruiter put me forward for a role and then subsequently e-mailed saying I didn't get it I would consider it very poor business. A call is required in that situation. The OP interviewed directly with the company. I can only think of once ever I interviewed and got a call to say I didn't get the job.