questionmark? wrote: » Care to elaborate?
questionmark? wrote: » Dan Boyle straight in to complain that the council shouldn't be on favour of it before planning is submitted (even though they don't have a say!)
AugustusMinimus wrote: » questionmark? wrote: » Dan Boyle straight in to complain that the council shouldn't be on favour of it before planning is submitted (even though they don't have a say!) Alarming.
SleetAndSnow wrote: » This is what makes Cork City council different then Dublin city council. They want high rise density apartments in the city.https://twitter.com/corkcitycouncil/status/1144212526722363394?s=09
BUNK1982 wrote: » I dismissed it as well when I heard it but having been down there for the Sea Festival thing I'm inclined to think that it's not the best use of the site. If they put it on either side of that spot i would be 110% for it but I'm starting to think that there could be something better (museum/ civic amenity etc.) done on that site.
cantalach wrote: » And my card-carrying Green Party sibling who lives in another city is a bit perplexed by this opposition. It would be interesting to know if this local opposition to high density development has the backing of Green Party leadership nationally, or if they are even aware of it.
Captainsatnav wrote: » That's not residential though and is pie in the sky stuff designed to grab headlines and raise awareness of that Irish American crowd's profile. It may get built but not anywhere near that scale. (I'm not a GP member or anything by the way - I just happen to agree with a lot of what they stand for. Urban, denser living being one of them)
snotboogie wrote: » The green party are ferociously campaigning against the Port of Cork Tower
Captainsatnav wrote: » To be fair this is exactly the kind of development that the Green Party would be in favour of, promote and advocate for.
Meursault wrote: » Agreed. Hopefully An Taisce, Greens, and miscellaneous NIMBYs stay out of this one, for a chance.
Deleted User wrote: » Who gives a fvck, just get it built
cgcsb wrote: » just 6m shorter than the planned Tara St tower
opus wrote: » Video is gone but here's a screenshot. Personally I'd love to see that built there as would open the door for more tall building down in the docklands.
sheff_ wrote: » You think the townland should read Garranedarragh? That would be the old farm/estate house behind dunnes. Interesting to see where access would be from if so, given the bottleneck eagle valley can be already
calnand wrote: » I heard from someone in the know that it's gone back for planning, and changing most apartments to one and two beds.
marno21 wrote: » SHD consultation filed this week with ABP for 115 houses and 112 apartments in Bishopstownhttp://www.pleanala.ie/casenum/304707.htm
snotboogie wrote: » The development at Jacobs Island wouldn't be aimed at families. i was listening to Ronan Lyons on newstalk this morning and he was saying that the massive under supply in Ireland is for young professionals who either want to live in 1 bed apts or share an apt with one or two others in the same demographic. His main point was that we need to get out of the mindset that all accommodation should be built with a couple and three kids in mind. In Mahon you could walk to work and to Mahon Point, get the bus into town and access the greenway to Douglas on a bike.
snotboogie wrote: » Could be apartment shares, which work out cheaper to the renters than 1 bedroom apts
Deleted User wrote: » You put three bedroom apartments in there and it's not professional singletons looking to buy.
cgcsb wrote: » Have you considered that not everyone has or wants kids?