Swashbuckler wrote: » I hear ya. It's the one thing I doubted when setting the session. I recall doing some sessions at that pace last year. The 1k reps had 90s recovery. 1200m rep session had 2mins recovery. I figured 2.30 was sensible enough given I have considered my approach pretty aggressive lately. By the end of the session I think 2.30 was just about right. Some of those Daniel's sessions look frightening on paper.
Duanington wrote: I also look at how far out a target race is - is it a "key" session? One to simulate race conditions 2 weeks out from a race? Reduce the recoveries
skyblue46 wrote: You'll have to pardon my ignorance here but are the lengths of recoveries not a huge part in what the session achieves? Longer recoveries making you comfortable and easier at a pace and shorter recoveries aimed at increasing endurance primarily?
Swashbuckler wrote: » On that, if you were doing a 10k race simulation type session how would you structure it? I've heard two very differing opinions on peaking for races, one of whom said longer splits are better eg mile splits like my session last week and another who said short, sharp splits are better eg. 400m off steady recoveries. Probably an oversimplified question as it's all about cumulative weeks etc but just curious on your thoughts.
Duanington wrote: » I find looking at the week before and the week ahead is a more balanced way to settle on recoveries. I also look at how far out a target race is - is it a "key" session? One to simulate race conditions 2 weeks out from a race? Reduce the recoveriesIs it a general strength\tempo session with no real specifity? I tend to give a little more recovery to ensure form stays good, stride pattern stays consistent etc....which is all part of the reason for running the session anyway.
Duanington wrote: » I suppose it comes down to the individual athlete really - someone may need more work at the sharper end and already have a really well developed threshold while someone else may have great turnover and leg speed but lack the bit of endurance to bring that out in a race. For others, a combination might work well ( I suspect I fall into this category) - some threshold type longer reps, cutting down to faster, more "hurty" reps. Physically and mentally challenging. I don't think there's one right answer here, I think it really depends on the individual needs
OOnegative wrote: Best of luck tomorrow evening, try not to elbow Mick to much!!! Run well!!
Swashbuckler wrote: » Tis a feckin day for the beach up here!
OOnegative wrote: Elbows didn’t work by looks of it, nice racing all the same P, very well done.
Swashbuckler wrote: » Now that's how you organize a race. Phenomenal. 36.23 chip time. Report will follow when I get a chance. Having some great family time up here. That's the best 10k I've been to in every aspect.
Swashbuckler wrote: » Believe it or not I got him on his cooldown.
Swashbuckler wrote: » Tried to find S but no sign so headed for warmup and ran into one of Luke's coachees. Joined him for warmup and had a good chat. Not sure Luke realizes but he's coaching a lad who's aim is to beat him in DCM. If you're reading this you might want to throw a few dodgy sessions in his plan.
AuldManKing wrote: » I get where you are coming from on the 'how to progress' part. I've seen guys who were our level just move on so much in the past 18 months (Marc is 1 example - Evan is another) - their training is the same/similar as ours - I guess they just have different genes or fibers. I was considering not doing DCM and spending a lot of time at 5k stuff (& faster) in an effort to really work on top end speed and 5k type endurance - trying to bring 5k's to under 5.30/mile pace that sort of stuff. SGMC gives 1 way - by shortening recovery / lenghtening the reps One thing I've taken from THE BOOK - and its rather simple. Is the area of Progression. Daniels doesn't really have clear progressions that are too visible as the sessions are a bit nuts, but the sorts of progressions that I'm working on now are visible to me, that brings confidence in executing the session and seeing how the next week progresses that...and so on.
KSU wrote: The key is patience that is why it is crucial to focus on the process rather than the outcome. We are an impatient breed and want everything straight away but half the battle is consistency and the best way to do that is enjoying the day to day and have faith the results will come rather than chopping and changing for the sake of it in order to crack the secret.
KSU wrote: can be hard at times when you plateau (sometimes that requires change and other times it is just patience)
healy1835 wrote: HM pb shape this autumn then I'd be confident enough that the 10k PB will go as well in the process.
Bluesquare wrote: Well done - enjoyed your report - made me examine my own effort . I really loved the race as well and liked the wide start and the fact that there was always people doing a similar effort around you . I couldn’t imagine moving at your pace but at a level where every second counts I’m not sure it’s an “honest ‘ course for pacing - while the there are no real hills to talk about there are lots of hidden inclines and declines.
Kellygirl wrote: Brilliant report P. You sound so confident and strong and I’m delighted for you.
shotgunmcos wrote: Where is your speed and endurance for 35mins? If you can bang out 3:30 1k reps no probs, shorten recovery or progressively lengthen reps. I guess what I'm suggesting is train in the 35min ballpark! (As if it was that easy)
Mellow Yellow 26.2 wrote: Excellent running and report!! Well done man.
AuldManKing wrote: Anyway - thanks for passing on the recording of the pair next door.....appreciated.