nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Iran Did Do It..............says Trump

specky4eyes

The fucking idiot of the united states has said that Iran did attack 2 oil tankers in the gulf of Oman, the idiot would want to take a step back and consider the consequences of going to war with Iran, Iran is not Iraq in 2003 after 13 years of sanctions against Saddam, the only way Usrael can beat Iran is by using nukes.

I have followed various wars and reasons for wars since the late 80's, looked into all I could find, and in every case a false narrative was put forward by the USA in it's want of war, just like today.

The US (best military in the world:rolleyes:) would be best looking at the fact it hasn't won a war since WW2, even then the Russians actually did the bulk of killing and dying.

I hope Russia stand in the way again and bring them to task or total destruction, the only solution.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

ILoveYourVibes

whisky_galore wrote: »

Dismantled and replaced with what exactly?

The next terrorist group obviously! Yeah Israel totally wants that cluster ****!

smurfjed

Subcomandante Marcos wrote: »

Anyone who thinks Iran attacked an oil tanker from a nation who's leader they were hosting at the time of the attack in an effort to improve relationships amid unwarranted US sanctions, is a ****ing moron.

There are two antagonists in this invented conflict, and neither of them are Iran.

And yet that innocent party then goes and destroys a drone. So why shouldn't we think that they attacked the ships ?

whisky_galore

smurfjed wrote: »

And yet that innocent party then goes and destroys a drone. So why shouldn't we think that they attacked the ships ?

Would any country tolerate another's drones buzzing around their airspace for long?

Gatling

whisky_galore wrote: »

Would any country tolerate another's drones buzzing around their airspace for long?

It's pretty common occurrence , the question has to be asked what happens of they hit a civilian airliner in international waters while shooting at drones

Gatling

So trump cleared airstrikes against Iran ,but withdrew the strike orders minutes before launching aircraft in the region ,

Looks like sooner or later Iran will be hit by some kind of limited strikes in retaliation

whisky_galore

Gatling wrote: »

It's pretty common occurrence , the question has to be asked what happens of they hit a civilian airliner in international waters while shooting at drones

Well they didn't. Countries test fire weapons and such like all of the time, you could be what if-ing until the cows come home.
Oh well strikes called off, Drumpf still upset that his toy was smashed up though.

smurgen

Gatling wrote: »

It's pretty common occurrence , the question has to be asked what happens of they hit a civilian airliner in international waters while shooting at drones

What if iran fly drones over the U.S? Would you have the same concerns vis a vis the U.S shooting it down?

[Deleted User]

whisky_galore wrote: »

Well they didn't. Countries test fire weapons and such like all of the time, you could be what if-ing until the cows come home.
Oh well strikes called off, Drumpf still upset that his toy was smashed up though.

Ha. Stick it to the man. I'm not sure how you think calling him Drumpf is doing anything except making you look childish and undermining your post.

Sonny noggs

Steyr 556 wrote: »

Stopped reading once you mentioned Gilead.

Good call!

whisky_galore

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Ha. Stick it to the man. I'm not sure how you think calling him Drumpf is doing anything except making you look childish and undermining your post.

He is petulant and childish so it's quite justified. He hardly acts or behaves like a statesman should. It's his original family name besides, before they changed it to blend in in the US, so ****ing what?

Sonny noggs

smurgen wrote: »

What if iran fly drones over the U.S? Would you have the same concerns vis a vis the U.S shooting it down?

Do you have proof it happened over Iran and not international waters?

Sonny noggs

whisky_galore wrote: »

He is petulant and childish so it's quite justified. He hardly acts or behaves like a statesman should. It's his original family name besides, before they changed it to blend in in the US, so ****ing what?

What exactly is the point of using it? What does it mean? Is it intended as an insult? Don’t get it.

Sonny noggs

whisky_galore wrote: »

Would any country tolerate another's drones buzzing around their airspace for long?

International waters is not their airspace...

Captain Chaos

smurgen wrote: »

What if iran fly drones over the U.S? Would you have the same concerns vis a vis the U.S shooting it down?

Wasn't over Iran, it was out to sea approx 30km. THe US Navy are recovering the wreckage as it's in international waters. Otherwise the Iranian Navy would be salvaging it for tech.

Fiery mutant

IRGC say they retrieved some ‘bits of the wreckage’, wonder will they show some pictures of it. Like the pictures shown yesterday of it being shot down, which actually tuned out to be pictures taken over Yemen 2 years ago.

smurgen

Gatling wrote: »

It's pretty common occurrence , the question has to be asked what happens of they hit a civilian airliner in international waters while shooting at drones

Like when the U.S hit the iranian airline jet killing 200+ people, 66 of them children in Iranian airspace ? Iranian Airliner 655 was a war crime.

[Deleted User]

whisky_galore wrote: »

He is petulant and childish so it's quite justified. He hardly acts or behaves like a statesman should. It's his original family name besides, before they changed it to blend in in the US, so ****ing what?

So...you react to his unstatesmanly like behaviour by calling him by his original family name?

That'll learn him....

Perhaps lay off the John Oliver a bit.

smurgen

Captain Chaos wrote: »

Wasn't over Iran, it was out to sea approx 30km. THe US Navy are recovering the wreckage as it's in international waters. Otherwise the Iranian Navy would be salvaging it for tech.

No it wasn't gps shows it in iranian waters.try again. Also the iranian navy have salvaged it.

Sonny noggs

smurgen wrote: »

No it wasn't gps shows it in iranian waters.try again. Also the iranian navy have salvaged it.

What GPS?

Sonny noggs

smurgen wrote: »

Like when the U.S hit the iranian airline jet killing 200+ people, 66 of them children in Iranian airspace ? Iranian Airliner 655 was a war crime.

“an act carried out during the conduct of a war that violates accepted international rules of war.”

Were the US and Iran at war in 1988?

Sonny noggs

Iran don’t need modern drone technology, they just need to get their hands on more of those state of the art F-5 fighter jets, then they can build the worlds best airforce.

InTheShadows

https://news.sky.com/story/us-president-called-iran-airstrikes-off-at-the-last-minute-11745994

But the media and lefties keep telling us Trump is a warmonger?

Wanderer78

InTheShadows wrote:

But the media and lefties keep telling us Trump is a warmonger?

Trumps a fcuking idiot, and I'm a proud lefty

InTheShadows

Wanderer78 wrote: »

Trumps a fcuking idiot, and I'm a proud lefty

So as a leftie you will give him a thumbs up for calling off the attack?

Wanderer78

InTheShadows wrote:

So as a leftie you will give him a thumbs up for calling off the attack?

Ignore anything he says, he's as thick as ****e, ignorant to

smurfjed

those state of the art F-5 fighter jets

Weren't they considered "state of the art" about 30 years ago.

Kermit.de.frog

Wanderer78 wrote: »

Ignore anything he says, he's as thick as ****e, ignorant to

You say you are a lefty? So surely you congratulate Trump on not launching strikes?

It's a fair question.

Realt Dearg Sec

InTheShadows wrote: »

Wanderer78 wrote: »

Trumps a fcuking idiot, and I'm a proud lefty

So as a leftie you will give him a thumbs up for calling off the attack?

Are you familiar with the term "sabre-rattling"?

Wanderer78

Kermit.de.frog wrote:

You say you are a lefty? So surely you congratulate Trump on not launching strikes?

I am indeed, and very proud of that fact. I know little or nothing about this incident, so I've no idea, I couldn't be bothered reading anything about him, he's as boring, and astonishingly ignorant, it's all a game anyway, and trump really doesn't have much power

Kermit.de.frog

Wanderer78 wrote: »

I am indeed, and very proud of that fact. I know little or nothing about this incident, so I've no idea, I couldn't be bothered reading anything about him, he's as boring, and astonishingly ignorant, it's all a game anyway, and trump really doesn't have much power

It's not a game. He is the President of the United States - and he decided to ignore Pompeo and Bolton.

So again, as a lefty, you must welcome this.

Or you are not a lefty at all.