Thought it might be nice to have an off topic chat thread.
How is everyone? Hope ye enjoy the forum.
jester77 wrote: » ohhh current affairs... have to be careful my wife doesn't find out about my girlfriend
Leland Vast Supernova wrote: » How can it be current affairs if it's an off topic chat? Is that not what After Hours is for now?
El Weirdo wrote: » I hear that Mr Sultan is sleeping with Mrs Raisin.
gozunda wrote: » The difference is afaik that the usual mythical animals found hiding under bridges found in AH aren't allowed in here ...
Deleted User wrote: » who will decide that, then ive seen that badge pinned on many long-term, non-rereg posters that simply disagreed with others to trust the term tbh
[Deleted User] wrote: » pinnerbots
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » 12 posts in and no one has blamed the muslims, travellers, leftists, rightists (is that even a word?) Centrists, soros, the brits, the RA or whatsherface o'doherty. I could get used to this
Matt Barrett wrote: » Trouble is you get an echo chamber if you try cut out legit opinions that are too controversial for some.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » I can see "lighthearted" is just going to WHOOOOOOOOOOSHHHH over the heads of some :rolleyes:
mike_ie wrote: » I'm curious. Do you think that describing travellers as "a plausible call for ethnic cleansing" is a legit opinion?
Matt Barrett wrote: » Sarcasm? Good chat :rolleyes:
Matt Barrett wrote: » If you can't differentiate between opinions that range from your favourite burger to ethnic cleansing I think you're in the wrong job.
mike_ie wrote: » The irony is not lost on me. Matt Barrett, if you want a discussion of the nuances of hate speech vs. opinion, start one. Don't sit back and force others to state their opinions so you can later pick them apart. Lay out exactly what you think hate speech encompasses vs. what opinions encompass, how the mods should deal with it, and all the other issues that such rules would entail. Then we can respond knowledgeably rather than in the current fog.
Trouble is you get an echo chamber if you try cut out legit opinions that are too controversial for some.
Sonny noggs wrote: » Great. No more EOTR, TROL, that militante lad etc. I see Leo’s partner is in though so assume we will be discussing FG endlessly.
Matt Barrett wrote: » I trust the irony of your comment isn't lost on you
Kivaro wrote: » Some of us asked for this forum. And it was delivered. Thanks to all of you who worked on it. I genuinely hope that it will be a success. It should allow AH return back to the happy/silly place it once was.