Bob24 wrote: » Arrival wrote: » But CGT only applies to any profit made over €1,270 no? Yes that’s right. But you’d still need to calculate your gains for the year based on all the transactions to see if it reaches that amount, and for someone who might have bought when prices were very low it could go up very quick. For exemple if someone bought their BTC when the price was 1000 euros (1/7th of today’s price), it means that each time they spend 7 euros they are making 6 euros in capital gain. So just using the card for €7000 per year gives 6000 euro in capital gain and reaches the threshold easily.
Arrival wrote: » But CGT only applies to any profit made over €1,270 no?
el diablo wrote: » Nice. I had a small bag on Binance of Chainlink (that I'd purchased at $0.32 over a year ago) that I'd completely forgotten about. Up 55% today and 770% over the last year. I don't know too much about this project so not sure if I should sell my holdings.
grindle wrote: » Personally I'd sell most but leave some percentage whether 10-40% as the moonshot if I think it may hit billions. Which it could, long term. Depends on how a bull goes, doesn't it? Tiny bit of Google news did this, mad. Small side-project for Google currently = 60% increase for LINK
stockshares wrote: » Although initially launching in the U.S., Helium intends to expand network coverage internationally, chief operating officer Frank Mong mentioned in a Medium blog post published Wednesday evening (CET)."https://blog.helium.com/telcos-arent-the-future-you-are-416da1754e9d
stockshares wrote: » Forbes has just posted about the Chainlink Google partnershiphttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/hanktucker/2019/06/13/google-integrates-cryptocurrency-project-with-new-blockchain-oracle/amp/
JohnnyFlash wrote: » That’s a contributor article. Which means that person has paid money to have their article posted on the Forbes website. Forbes haven’t an ounce of journalistic integrity left. The 4chan oddballs will be happy about the chainlink pump.
stockshares wrote: » It will be interesting when Facebook launch the White paper next week. I think Ziliqa are connected with it.
stockshares wrote: » I wasn't aware of that, thanks for pointing it out.
Whelo79 wrote: » Why do you think this?
stockshares wrote: » There are many rumours about it on Telegram. Looks like it's not true though going by Zils Twitter.
grindle wrote: » Don't trust internet shills - if there's no source behind the comment disregard it completely and don't trade based on a "What if?".
stockshares wrote: » Maybe there is something in it relating to a partnership with another company.
grindle wrote: » Maybe, but given the way crypto announcements go they'll be partnering with a library in Nantucket or something. "The words 'crypto' and 'partnership' when combined should be viewed under microscope. Maybe it's big, probably it's not.
stockshares wrote: » PayPal, Visa, Mastercard and Uber investing in Facebook Coin.https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebooks-new-cryptocurrency-gets-big-backers-11560463312
Addison Fancy Macrame wrote: » Pretty damn centralised so.
stockshares wrote: » With PayPal, Visa and Mastercard involved Max Keisers prediction that it will kill Xrp might be correct.
Facebook could be the US government's way of influencing crypto for Bankers Benefit
Addison Fancy Macrame wrote: » Just on this topic, could we even have imagined 2/3 years ago that Facebook and these allies would have been getting involved in their own global crypto currency now. It's becoming the norm to not even be surprised by mnc's getting involved in the space.
Dohnjoe wrote: » XRP focuses more on interbank systems, xborder settlement and communications like SWIFT. PP, Visa and MC are payment systems - a slightly different sphere (with some overlap)
