grindle wrote: » Maybe, but given the way crypto announcements go they'll be partnering with a library in Nantucket or something. "The words 'crypto' and 'partnership' when combined should be viewed under microscope. Maybe it's big, probably it's not.
stockshares wrote: » Maybe there is something in it relating to a partnership with another company.
grindle wrote: » Don't trust internet shills - if there's no source behind the comment disregard it completely and don't trade based on a "What if?".
stockshares wrote: » There are many rumours about it on Telegram. Looks like it's not true though going by Zils Twitter.
Whelo79 wrote: » Why do you think this?
el diablo wrote: » Nice. I had a small bag on Binance of Chainlink (that I'd purchased at $0.32 over a year ago) that I'd completely forgotten about. Up 55% today and 770% over the last year. I don't know too much about this project so not sure if I should sell my holdings.
stockshares wrote: » I wasn't aware of that, thanks for pointing it out.
stockshares wrote: » It will be interesting when Facebook launch the White paper next week. I think Ziliqa are connected with it.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » That’s a contributor article. Which means that person has paid money to have their article posted on the Forbes website. Forbes haven’t an ounce of journalistic integrity left. The 4chan oddballs will be happy about the chainlink pump.
stockshares wrote: » Forbes has just posted about the Chainlink Google partnershiphttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/hanktucker/2019/06/13/google-integrates-cryptocurrency-project-with-new-blockchain-oracle/amp/
stockshares wrote: » Although initially launching in the U.S., Helium intends to expand network coverage internationally, chief operating officer Frank Mong mentioned in a Medium blog post published Wednesday evening (CET)."https://blog.helium.com/telcos-arent-the-future-you-are-416da1754e9d
grindle wrote: » Personally I'd sell most but leave some percentage whether 10-40% as the moonshot if I think it may hit billions. Which it could, long term. Depends on how a bull goes, doesn't it? Tiny bit of Google news did this, mad. Small side-project for Google currently = 60% increase for LINK
Bob24 wrote: » Arrival wrote: » But CGT only applies to any profit made over €1,270 no? Yes that’s right. But you’d still need to calculate your gains for the year based on all the transactions to see if it reaches that amount, and for someone who might have bought when prices were very low it could go up very quick. For exemple if someone bought their BTC when the price was 1000 euros (1/7th of today’s price), it means that each time they spend 7 euros they are making 6 euros in capital gain. So just using the card for €7000 per year gives 6000 euro in capital gain and reaches the threshold easily.
Arrival wrote: » But CGT only applies to any profit made over €1,270 no?
Arrival wrote: » Respond when you actually have because I'm genuinely interested in any possible criticisms others may have. It's 40mins but it's so well made it flies by
makeorbrake wrote: » Arrival wrote: » Just watch the video and see for yourself, I literally stated in my post to not be put off by the $10m price prediction on the thumbnail yet there you are. Would you comment on an article without reading it? I hope not, because that would be pointless Don't get yer knickers in a twist. I've been glued to this 5hit (crypto media) for quite a while. To lead with that is irresponsible - regardless what's behind it. There's not exactly a shortage of media to rummage through - so I *might* watch it later.
Arrival wrote: » Just watch the video and see for yourself, I literally stated in my post to not be put off by the $10m price prediction on the thumbnail yet there you are. Would you comment on an article without reading it? I hope not, because that would be pointless
makeorbrake wrote: » Addison Fancy Macrame wrote: » I thought it would be a propaganda video re $10m but it's just an explainer worth sending to friends who may have an interest. Not a criticism as such from me on posting it - particularly when I didn't even watch it. I watch/listen/read a shed load on crypto (as I'm sure many do here) - and try and cover the upbeat and downbeat stuff equally - and try and figure stuff out from all of it combined (which is still impossible given that at the back of it all, none of it can be trusted as there is bias in practically everything. The only difference may be the degree of the bias shown). Anyway, that's the crypto space!
Addison Fancy Macrame wrote: » I thought it would be a propaganda video re $10m but it's just an explainer worth sending to friends who may have an interest.
stockshares wrote: » The people that promote Bitcoin never mention its limitations.
stockshares wrote: » The numerous Coin forks were supposed to have corrected these limitations yet Bitcoin still gets promoted in the media and no one mentions the forked coins in the media. For example in the video the forked coins were never mentioned. Are they not the new and improved versions of Bitcoin
stockshares wrote: » For example in the video the forked coins were never mentioned. Are they not the new and improved versions of Bitcoin
