onetimecypher wrote: » https://www.google.ie/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwj1qaqc3uXiAhUit3EKHTD5DtYQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2Fteslamotors%2Fcomments%2F4i3ohx%2Flithium_mine_vs_oil_production_this_is_going%2F&psig=AOvVaw2PDZEaXwzovF4lSMgpuXta&ust=1560490455385177
Gangu wrote: » Living a more sustainable life in a climate change emergency We are a small family in Dublin. Like many I have to come increasingly aware of the need to change our way of living (thanks Gretter, the guardian and Twitter). We have made some changes such as stopping buying plastic bottles, switching to keep cups, composting, recycling clothes et cetera. I am sure we could do more. It would be great to have a thread here on boards giving practical tips to ordinary people and families about practical (as opposed to political) changes that they can make to switch to a more sustainable life. Do you have any tips?
Hardcharger wrote: » You be must a right pain to live with. Like Catholic maniac 30 years ago who forced his kids to kneel down and say the rosary. The new religion is climate change diversity inclusion and equity etc
vladmydad wrote: » Oh so it’s climate “emergency” now lol. Folks just live your life and enjoy it. Drive your car, go on as many holidays as you can and eat all the wonderful food you can. I promise the world is not going to end and humanity will not destroy the planet. Human ingenuity and technology will solve any climate problems (if there is a problem). For example Carbon capture technology is already in development (google it). And above all please put down the Guardian and let go of your middle class guilt.
Gangu wrote: » Interesting to see the trolls and climate change deniers try to high jack the thread. Even more interesting to see the type of other posts of these people put up - very telling. Don’t take the bait and let’s keep on topic. It’s just wasted energy dealing in with them.
Wanderer78 wrote: » This is a very tricky one, but fair play to people like the op, but there's severe limitations that the individual can do to resolve these issues, its a mammoth task for our race to resolve, very deep global changes are required
uluwatu wrote: » One approach would be to calculate CO2 savings and do what saves the most?
denismc wrote: » Lawnmowers and petrol driven garden equipment are huge polluters, not just CO2 but pollutants such as benzenes NOx. Figures from the U.S in 2011:approximately 26.7 million tons of pollutants were emitted by GLGE (VOC=461,800; CO=5,793,200; NOx=68,500, PM10=20,700; CO2=20,382,400), accounting for 24%−45% of all nonroad gasoline emissions (GLGE = petrol driven lawn equipment) 2 stroke engines seem to the biggest polluters. So maybe consider changing to battery and electric powered garden equipment or better still let some of your garden grow wild.
Water John wrote: » That is the thinking and the politics of people like Trump. There is no objective scientifically based reality only how you feel.
cutelad wrote: » We should look at what we are doing. Reduce costs for recycling etc more people will do it. My big worry is Green Party will get into government and put taxes on everything. It will result in punishing country folk with carbon taxes for our cars as an example. They want us go electric what a farce. Sorry rant over
Macha wrote: » [mod] OK, let's not go down a tangent discussion for why posters can be naysayers on boards (that topic could have its own forum..). Please stay on topic about what individual changes need to happen to tackle the climate and biodiversity crises. Of course that can include comments about the limitations of relying only on individual changes rather than system change. [/mod]
Pheonix10 wrote: » Farce to move to electric cars? Eh. More like we should get rid of cars and improve public transportation.
is_that_so wrote: » Nature of modern living means that cars are required. We can reduce their use but not without the public transportation being fixed first.