eagle eye wrote: » If a younger smarter person takes up his mantle he will get elected and probably top a poll.
pjohnson wrote: » Ah so is this the line to excuse him now?
seamus wrote: » Greens are the only party putting the most important issue front and centre and it's great to see people realising it. Housing, healthcare, taxes, debt, employment, immigration, culture, justice, religion. All absolutely pointless and meaningless if our ecosystem collapses.
mgn wrote: » What excuse,He is not a politician i think 7% it's a good result.Ming a sitting MEP only on 10%.He has nothing to be embarrassed about unlike some of the other candidates.
thecretinhop wrote: » Oh wow great. Good job we are not 200 billion in debt... oh wait.. So sorry just checked 222 billion
Wheeliebin30 wrote: » The dinosaurs should have voted greens. They might be still here today.
dxhound2005 wrote: » Trump is not a politician (so he says) but he is President of America.
mgn wrote: » And doing what he said he would do unlike politicians
is_that_so wrote: This sounds an awful lot like wishful thinking. I doubt it will be an awful lot higher, indeed it may even be lower with the MOE. 7% sounds about right considering the polls coming up to this.
Yer Da sells Avon wrote: » I wonder if this might be the end of Peter Casey's electoral ambitions, or will he go for the hat-trick at the next general election? The fact that a previously unknown candidate, whose main claim to fame is that she tore him a new one during a TV debate, has done so well just goes to show how popular his brand of racism is with the electorate. Absolutely delighted with that.
eagle eye wrote: » Well I voted for Casey and it was my full time intention and state I voted for McGuiness if they was polled. Not due to embarrassment or anything like that, just to mess up then polling which I don't like.
Nobelium wrote: » Good grief you people are easily brainwashed.
dxhound2005 wrote: » Today, RED C spoke to 3230 voters in polling stations nationwide. If they all told lies like you would have, then the results could easily still be close to the real thing.
alchemist33 wrote: » Surely the fact that he doesn't seem to know what the word "racist" means, thinking its synonymous with patriotism or nationalism, speaks volumes? How could anyone with that little cop-on be trusted to represent us?
Bobblehats wrote: » Or anyone, for that matter as I figure the vote registers loudest is the one that does not register at all.
Nobelium wrote: » given how is opponents use the term they don't know the meaning of it either, in fact it has become a meaningless ad homiem attempt at this stage.
listermint wrote: » Ah Peter will you get some kip, it's been a long day . You'll need the rest
Nobelium wrote: » hug some trees and dream of imposing carbon taxes on ordinary people you'll feel better
RoboKlopp wrote: » Quite the retort
dxhound2005 wrote: » https://commodity.com/debt-clock/japan/According to the IMF, Japan’s national debt to GDP ratio was 236% in 2017, making it the highest national debt in the world when compared to the national income. The poor oul Japanese must be bankrupted for ten generations. In reality capitalism depends on lending and borrowing and every country in the world has a national debt. Ours is nothing out of the ordinary.
jeremyj1968 wrote: » I saw that number as well. I can't believe that they are actually reporting "Exit polls" based on such small numbers. I reckon if I had put a full tank in the Granada this morning and put in a long day I could have got the opinions of more than that.
Samuel Vimes wrote: Ha ha ha, you wish lol