myshirt wrote: » Hopefully a precursor to moving the legal drinking age to 23. 18 is way too young to put a drink into the hands of a person. They're a child effectively, especially now with how long it takes them to fly the coop.
misstearheus wrote: » Thank you that is very helpful L. Soooo 18 isn't actually "the" legal age anymore then really if some places are Over-23s and Over-30s... Hhmmm interesting... So, in a way, ya could say there actually isn't A legal age at all anymore!! 'Cos how can ya say it's one or the other or the other other lol! Would it not kinda need to be just one age and uniform like..... Very interesting...
L1011 wrote: » Once an age limit is strictly and uniformly enforced its entirely legit. Over 21s pubs are very common; over 23s less so but there are even some over 30s nightclubs in Dublin at least. Not actually sure why its allowed, considering it doesn't work for every other protected discrimination category; but it is.
myshirt wrote: » Just because you are 18 doesn't give you a right to sip the one pint in any pub across the country for the night, or get magically drunk from a few 7-ups.
misstearheus wrote: » Don't understand ya. Would the implementation of said certain legal required age not be the right required?!
DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: » The owner can reserve the right to refuse entry. It's nothing to do with drinking age.
Galwayguy35 wrote: » It's a good idea anyway, I like the sound of an over 30s nightclub.
Gatling wrote: » Now if anyone happens to find a over 30s bar let me know
Allinall wrote: » They’re called public houses, but they are private businesses, and can let in ( or not) whoever the fcuk they like.
odyssey06 wrote: » On an individual basis yes. On a collective basis no. They can say No team colours they cant say no coloured people.
myshirt wrote: » Nope. And by way of background, I'm a former solicitor. If you have a Google app on your phone, delete it. Let the lesson be learned that googling something or talking to the local expert on everything" in a taxi or a pub is never a replacement for a law degree. Ever. You haven't a rashers what you're on about, and you couldn't be further from the mark. The answer to your question and assumptions is no, nope, no, and never. This is why I worry about Google. Everyone with Google is an expert now.
misstearheus wrote: » Google not part of anything at all. The idea of the Thread is because I don't know! What do you mean the answer to my question? What question? What question are you answering? You aren't actually answering anything! It's widely known that turning 18 makes it legal to drink and legal to drive! What have you answered??! What I am asking about is how is one supposed to know this? If you're saying 18 isn't the legal age to drink then why was there an age of 18 to become legal brought in? Answer the questions and don't answer things ya feel like or things that weren't even asked!
Get Real wrote: » Black door on Harcourt Street generally have a 28+ policy. Not quite 30, but almost!
myshirt wrote: » You said would the implementation of said legal age not be the right required. A one hand face palm is not enough. A two handed face palm is required here.