leggo wrote: » So the rushed pace is most likely GRRM's fault. But instead he gets lionised by doing absolutely nothing and the people that actually do the work get slated. 2019 folks! :pac:
Necro wrote: » It bugs you because the entire scenario makes absolutely no sense in fairness. Jon disarms himself to speak to Tyrion who is a prisoner of the queen and accused of treason. Yet is allowed to rearm himself and wander essentially un-noticed by all bar Drogon in to see Dany. It was patently awful tbh. And that's before I get going on 'Bran the Broken'.
pinkypinky wrote: » Why would Brienne not mention that Jaime knighted her?
Paddy Cow wrote: » She didn't need to. Tyrion and Pod were there when she was knighted. It is known.
RobbingBandit wrote: » You play the Game of Thrones you win or you die these cretins didn't die.
....... wrote: » It's interesting that the book reader thread has so few posts compared to the non book reader thread.
jebidiah wrote: » I'm glad the show is over. This last season has been terribly disappointing. Im not even sad or upset at anything. I'm not 100% unhappy with where the characters ended up, but I'm very disappointed in the shortcut road they took to get there. Sansa declaring the north a free and independent kingdom is one of the stupidest things I've ever seen. 1. Bran is the older male heir. 2. Jon Snow was the King in the North, not Sansa. He was declared, as was Robb, Sansa just took the crown? 3. Are the Dornish and Ironborn not going to maybe want to be independent now too? 4. Brandon Stark, the head of the ****ing whole house is the ****ing king of the 7 kingdoms. Why would people GO BACK NORTH???
Tazzimus wrote: » 1. Bran renounced his lordship, cos he was the three eyed raven and not Bran anymore. Except when they needed him to be king, then he was Bran again. Sansa has been Lady of Winterfell for a while now, possibly since battle of the bastards. 2. He gave up the King in the North title when he bent the knee to female Hitler. 3. Dorne should already be independent, they were the one that Aegon couldn't conquer. Ironborn just faded into the background as they usually do. 4. See 1
jebidiah wrote: » All the lord's just laughed at the idea of democracy, I don't see how their attitudes to women in power would have changed either.
jebidiah wrote: » And no.1 doesn't make 4 make sense. They wouldn't have to bend the knee. Did he name him Bran Stark when he named him king? I'll have to rewatch that scene...
ixoy wrote: » It also seems less.. angry. We're not as displeased it seems.
Tazzimus wrote: » Is that in reference to Sansa or Dany?
jebidiah wrote: » Dany had a dragon, so the lords didn't say anything. And even Varys said the lords of westeros prefer men.
jebidiah wrote: » 2. Jon Snow was the King in the North, not Sansa. He was declared, as was Robb, Sansa just took the crown?
jebidiah wrote: » Jon taking the black makes a bit of sense actually. He doesn't want to be king, now he won't be. Won't hold titles so can't be declared, father no children, no kids with a claim etc etc
paulbok wrote: » Well he didn't stay on the watch long, fëcked off beyond the wall with the Wildlings so is likely to get involved with someone eventually.
Achasanai wrote: » Arya suddenly deciding to be a sea explorer. Had she ever expressed an interest in this before? It seemed like they had run out of ideas as to where her character would go or GRRM told them how her character would end, but forgot to tell them how to write it convincingly.