sugarman wrote: » They should probably include the rowdy aul wans out on the town together that have had too much vino, they're the worst of the lot hanging out of young fellas young enough to be their sons, pinching their arses and saying all sorts. A woman has the benefit of telling one of the bouncers if shes getting abused and the fella will get turfed out, the other way around you get laughed out of it.
Atoms for Peace wrote: » A women putting her hands on your shoulders is sexual assault now? Very bizarre ad.
Omackeral wrote: Someone is going to bring up hen nights...
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Women are victims of this behaviour the majority of the time but it also happens to guys from women. I was 16 working in a hotel and I was groped and felt up by a bunch of drunken women at a function. I said it to my supervisor at the time, his response was a good looking lad like you will have to get used to it. I doubt the same conversation would have happened if I were female. Sexual assualt is what is regardless of the sex of the victim.
GarIT wrote: Where did you get those stats? I've rarely ever had a female friend get groped while on a night out but it happens to the lads I'm with all the time.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » I didn't give stats but if you wish to find out who are predominantly the victims of sexual assualt it's not hard to guess which sex is the most representative of the stats available. Of course the figures may be skewed by males under reporting but I doubt it.
GarIT wrote: When you say "the majority" you are saying >50%, which is a stat. I do believe that it is under reported significantly so. At this stage I've been groped by women on hen parties at least 15 times and I've always thought there was no point reporting it because something like that is near impossible to prove even if it is taken seriously. I tried talking to the bouncers the first 3 or 4 times but they couldn't give a ****.
lmimmfn wrote: » Hmmm, lets analyse this: 1. Older woman puts hands on shoulders - this is not sexual harassment, this is uncomfortable and weird for the guy 2. Im not sure what to make of this, she is with him initially, he orders drinks for both and then she is uncomfortable, what does that have to do with sexual harassment? more than likely 2 seconds later she fecks off and hes left with the bill 3. The guy doesnt want to shower with the rest of them, the other guy is bullying, its not sexual harassment, its harassment. 4. On the stairs, no context, i.e. they seem to know one another and have been intimate previously, if that is the context then while it is awkward i would hardly think she should take a sexual harassment case against him. She seems to be comfortable initially then when he kisses her but after the kiss its as if she has been interfered with at a serious level. 5. Agree with this one, but it looks like it is going to be a lot more than sexual harassment and more of a sexual predator trying to see how far he can get. This ad tries to go from soft sexual harassment to extreme cases but in doing so it is actually going for weird/awkward situations to effectively potential rape and it is separately mixing bulling with this( you could argue that it is sexual harassment because the guy doesnt want to be naked but cmon its just bullying and a bully who would do this to someone who doesnt want to be naked in front of other guys has a lot more issues than bullying - and i dont think this would be acceptable in his 'bullying' social circle ) I dont know, i think this crap has gone to far on a social level, instead of focusing on a broad range of cases which are largely questionable as we dont have any info on the context, sexual harassment should be specifically targeted at the workplace, where i am guessing the impact is larger for the folk involved.
KSU wrote: » Under reporting is probably a massive amount ...
sugarman wrote: » I was more on about the general middle aged women out acting like its their hen night every weekend If you worked in bar you'd know the type. ...but same applies to hen parties I suppose. Personally I dont mind them as a single bloke thats more often than not up for a bit of craic but not everyone is and that should be respected equally.
Deleted User wrote: » wise up now. I would never be described as either a puritan or overly politically correct about these things but 1 is obviously dodgy. You can't do anything like that in a work environment. it's bang out of order especially if he is junior to here 2 ditto. No indication they are already together, he ignores everything she says and starts pawing at her even though she is obviously not interested 3 maybe isn't sexual harassment specifically but as you say it's harrassment 4 again he's not listening to her and is taking liberties 5 yes he's a predator I think the point of the campaign is that this behaviour is a royal pain in the hoop at best and criminal at worst, so stop doing it. It's also making the point that it's not a case of rape / not rape. "I'm not a rapist so my behaviour is ok" is a stupid line. Also all the people talking about hen nights are making the same point as the ad. Low-ish level sexual gob****ery is not cool and people whether men or women should not do it.
rusty cole wrote: » we were talking about this today and the question came up, is there not even one ounce of harassment, sexual or otherwise in the LGBTQ community? Why does the ad infer that sexual harassment is perpetrated by men on women four times for every once a women harasses a man? it's like only straight folks sexually harass.. If LGBTQ people make up such a large section of society, why aren't they represented on this ad??? or perhaps is there a reason?? If we consider one of the biggest alleged sexual harassers in the the Media would have been Gay, Al Porter..
AllForIt wrote: » You/d think there was some kind of sexual harassment epidemic going on. Why do some ppl want us to believe there is?