Joeytheparrot wrote: » They're hiding the sun again today. The Soros cabal, The communists, The Islamists and The Flouridators have conspired together to hide it. They will probably make it rain on election day so gemma loses
ollkiller wrote: » Yes seriously enslaved women in work houses. Any tiny bit of research will show this to be true but you know that already. You know what the Catholic Church did for Irish people. Control. A bunch of judgy ***** is all they were.
Patty Hearst wrote: » Nice evasion there...very blatant
Patty Hearst wrote: » You're finally coming around the truth..great to see. Don't forget the Lizards, Jews and Freemasons. They're the ones you really want to watch out for
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Just seen her latest video from Tallaght Apparently a woman snatched a leaflet out of her hand, this constitutes an "attack" in Gemma's mind. In the video she is recording the woman (who is recording her) and the video is entitled "ACI attackes by soros shill". She repeatedly asks on the video if anyone knows the womans name and if they do please contact her with the name.
TaurenDruid wrote: » Got a link for that HSE doc?
Charles Ingles wrote: » She was attacked and it's unfair the way she is treated on the canvas trail, the internet trolls are harmless and I'd question their motives
Charles Ingles wrote: » I'm a proud Catholic and so are most of my family and friends. They are all warm loving compassionate people, who contribute to their community and do volunteer work not judgemental at all. Don't know where you are meeting your Catholics that's if you even know any.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » He said catholic church, not every day catholics.
SoundsRight wrote: » If you look at the lie of the land across Europe ahead of the elections, there's a growing trend towards populist, right wing politics. Pro-family, anti-immigration, conservative policies. Why should Ireland be any different? If it wasn't Gemma it'd be someone else saying it.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » What about her bullying and attacking Fiona O'Leary. Is that ok with you? What about her supporters burning places like Rooskey down? Is that ok with you? What about her extreme haye mongering racism? Is that ok with you?
Patty Hearst wrote: » https://www2.hse.ie/conditions/abortion/after-an-abortion/pregnancy-remains.html
Charles Ingles wrote: » We are the church
TaurenDruid wrote: » Oh, right - they're from two different pages... I see what you did there. In which case, I guess the answer to your question is "empathy for fellow human beings", something you might wish to try but which seems in short supply among many anti-choicers.
Patty Hearst wrote: » Of course they're from two different pages, one is for abortion the other for miscarriages ..that was kind of the point of my post. And yes I have a lot of empathy for all human beings.
Patty Hearst wrote: » Nuns threw it in a septic tank back in the day... HSE flush it down the jacks today...how progressive, we've really moved on. But wait! Its just a clump of cells! But why then do the HSE call the remains of a miscarriage a 'baby' And tell mothers that they can 'bury your baby' How can one be a baby and another be 'remains'?? That doesn't really make sense does it? Schrodingers baby I suppose..
TaurenDruid wrote: » And yet somehow can't see why someone who has chosen to take an abortion pill would not want to see an embryo or fetus referred to as "your baby"; and that someone who has experienced a miscarriage of a presumably wanted child might want to see them referred to as "your baby"? Wow.
Patty Hearst wrote: » Exactly, objective reality does not depend on the feelings of the viewer, it cannot be both a baby and not a baby at the same time. It either is or it isn't
Charles Ingles wrote: I'm a proud Catholic and so are most of my family and friends. They are all warm loving compassionate people, who contribute to their community and do volunteer work not judgemental at all. Don't know where you are meeting your Catholics that's if you even know any.
Guy:Incognito wrote: » It's almost like everyone's views are different so each should be left alone to make their own decisions with some **** whinging and waving an ancient book of fairy stories at them. If one group of adults is free to delude themselves in to living by such a book, the rest of us are free not to without having to justify our decisions to such people.
Patty Hearst wrote: » For some it has nothing whatsoever to do with any type of religious conviction..