tomwaits48 wrote: » Yes I really enjoyed the latest one, I thought the 5 part one dragged on for too long so this pod was a breath of fresh air. Shocking story.
Pidae.m wrote: » Jesus if they do I'll give it a skip!
Dots1982 wrote: » Pidae.m wrote: » Jesus if they do I'll give it a skip! Would doubt it would have the level of detail and depravity that the Moors murders had.
Pidae.m wrote: » The tape recordings were haunting.
PropJoe10 wrote: » Think that was the most fecked up stuff ever released on Casefile. Horrific.
glasso wrote: » all a bit drab recently imo - narrator not really giving it his all anymore imo. .
glasso wrote: » yes that was ok but dragged a little. could have been a 4 parter easily. in general I think that, to me anyway, notwithstanding his neutral tone, the narrator is not putting as much of himself into it. the writing seems more variable and the cases not as good in general also imo.
glasso wrote: » latest episode about the Australian girl was fairly dull and uninspiring.
PropJoe10 wrote: » Not really too sure what people are expecting. It's a true crime series. There'll be some dramatic ones but they're trying to tell real life stories about real events. I don't see much of a drop in quality at all, I must say.
Murdoc90 wrote: » came across the serial killer podcast few weeks back anyone listened to it? the host is an eccentric Scandinavian its very close to the casefile model. Highly recommend.
glasso wrote: » that latest drug addict murder case was dreary and dull (if a sad story) - the downswing continues.
Cienciano wrote: » I think this was one of the worse episodes ever (insert comic book guy meme). Nothing notewordy about it whatsoever.
Dots1982 wrote: » If you’ve unsubscribed then resubscribe. This weeks episode is a good one.