johnjacob wrote: » So what are you doing with the excess?
KCross wrote: » Does it just have one setting regardless of whether its the granny cable or the 32A EVSE?
Evd-Burner wrote: » It really isn't worth buying a diverter and a new hot water tank just to divert the hot water. It will take years just to pay off the diverter, nevermind the tank!
johnjacob wrote: » So what are you doing with the excess? Be much handier if we could just feed it back into the grid rather than buy batteries One neighbor has a very old meter and it runs backwards, so they are quids in
unkel wrote: » And the minimum setting when using the EVSE is still drawing about 4.2kW, so no good to me (a good bit more than my solar PV can provide) The maximum setting when using the granny cable is a bit over 2kW, so perfect. Were it not for the fact I have to be using the granny cable, which flies in the face of the max convenience setup I have with my EVSE
unkel wrote: » Where did you get those settings from, couldn't find it myself
unkel wrote: » I'm disappointed I can't set the minimum below 17A. That indeed forces me to use a granny cable (or partially import from the grid)
unkel wrote: » Ioniq has 3 settings on the granny cable too. I'm using the max charge rate
KCross wrote: » Must be 10A, 8A and 6A then? Did you try them to see what they pull?
BobFedora wrote: » well, thats it really. i know that paying for PV and a new cylinder isn't the smartest thing to do with my money financially. i could pay circa 8k off my mortgage instead. but, -small change environmentally is better than nothing -i (or some combination of me, wife, child) wil be in the house for another 20+ yrs minimum so long term planning -i like the idea of having 200L of hot water mostly for free (my current HW cylinder is 120L)
lightson wrote: » 1.8kw system including 2.4 kwh battery and diverter...
Evd-Burner wrote: » Now getting an electric car and getting a Zappi charger that can use exactly what you would be exporting to the grid will make a difference both financially and environmentally, you would need a charger for the car irregardless.
unkel wrote: » Let's say the Zappi costs €400 more than a basic charger.
unkel wrote: » You can get a second hand charger for around €200 if you are prepared to be on the lookout for a while.
Evd-Burner wrote: » When I get the house I will be going for the Zappi straight away, as it allows me to charge off excess solar in the future. It also negate the need of having a priority switch. On top of that I will also qualify for a grant of 600 towards getting the charger! Win win.
I says wrote: » Hello long time lurker first time posting got a quote today 10 panel estimate performance of 2,700 per yr and a 14 panel 4.8kw battery. I’m thinking about the batteries down the line as most of our needs are after five most enenings. Has anyone a similar setup of both for usage? EST cost after grant for both is circa 7k and battery 11k any advice or opinions please. Usage around house and farm 6,800kw per year.
Evd-Burner wrote: » BobFedora wrote: » well, thats it really. i know that paying for PV and a new cylinder isn't the smartest thing to do with my money financially. i could pay circa 8k off my mortgage instead. but, -small change environmentally is better than nothing -i (or some combination of me, wife, child) wil be in the house for another 20+ yrs minimum so long term planning -i like the idea of having 200L of hot water mostly for free (my current HW cylinder is 120L) Adding the diverter and adding the hot tank is not making any difference environmentally by having the inverter. You would environmentally make a bigger impact giving the juice away to the grid for free! You also aren't saving any money on the inverter and new water tank either, it's actually costing you! The break even point would be 30+ years! That's without anything breaking or you getting an electric car in the future. Now getting an electric car and getting a Zappi charger that can use exactly what you would be exporting to the grid will make a difference both financially and environmentally, you would need a charger for the car irregardless.
rolion wrote: » I think is a foollish ideea ... Nice one. You will need a healthy minimum installed PV power to have 3.3Kw for EV and rest for overheads. And that in a good day,may to september ... A N D ... while the car is resting in front of the house of course,day time. Until then think how much a car will have as a minimum charge so that it will not steal from the grid and use only excess energy from the generated PVs. How many chargers could provide a minimum setting for the EV charge !? Does your charger has this functionality ? Does the car has it built-in ? I dont know,sorry .
rolion wrote: » I think is a foollish ideea ... Nice one. You will need a healthy minimum installed PV power to have 3.3Kw for EV and rest for overheads. And that in a good day,may to september ... A N D ... while the car is resting in front of the house of course,day time. Until then think how much a car will have as a minimum charge so that it will not steal from the grid and use only excess energy from the generated PVs. How many chargers could provide a minimum setting for the EV charge !? Does your charger has this functionality ? Does the car has it built-in ? I dont know,sorry . Maybe a user and owner can provide few graphs showing that the production of the PVs versus EV charging and rate of feeding the electrons from PV to car and / or from grid. I am still looking for a graph these days... but i'm getting only words. Good luck.
wexfordman2 wrote: » Not that I am.diasagreeing, but could you explain the logic. How is using a diverter not environmentally.sound,.or how is exporting your excess more.envirinmentally.sound ?
KCross wrote: » In your scenario its the right choice assuming the Zappi is reliable (remains to be seen). It doesnt really matter if you use the SolarPV element of it or not it still make sense. You need about 2kW of excess to charge the EV (not 3.3kW).... looks like you had 3-4kW from 10:00-17:00 today.... that would have put a decent charge into your Leaf. And of course, yes, it requires the car to be at home. For some people it is at home... If its not for you then it makes no sense.