The high horse brigade wrote: I've been paid extra to train, it's very much the norm to get extra or bonus to train and I'd not do it otherwise
The high horse brigade wrote: » I've been paid extra to train, it's very much the norm to get extra or bonus to train and I'd not do it otherwise
Dial Hard wrote: » I've been in the workplace a long time and I have literally never been paid extra to train a new hire in nor heard of it being done. It's just part and parcel of working life, ime.
Aint Eazy Being Cheezy wrote: » Depends on if you’ve asked for it or not. In my workplace, if someone asks for a rise to train in a new hire, that gives us a decision to make. If they say nothing, it’s safe to assume they’re happy to do so.
Doterraorange wrote: » Thank you for taking your time to reply. Of course it is my business, it is someone coming into my department that i will be working with 8 hours a day. I am not happy with it as i find it very disrespectful the way it was handled, so yes i will consider my options. CV been done up today
Doterraorange wrote: » Is this normal ? has anyone experienced this before?
trihead wrote: » Was the position advertised?Issue for HR if not - I’m assuming it was.
micky jammy delahunty wrote: » … but came to the conclusion that managers are hired for being a certain "type" of person, and that "type" of person generally knows nothing. Nepotism is usually a feature, but things like social class too.
Deleted User wrote: » Hasn't been a feature in any workplaces I've worked in. I can imagine something like this happening in 'Mom 'n Pop' type outfits.
quokula wrote: » I've never known HR to actually make hiring decisions anywhere I've worked? It's up to the person responsible for the team being hired into, or senior management. HR usually just handle the admin. So I'd question whether the HR manager has the power to put their sister into a role they're unqualified for.
AmberGold wrote: » Keep the head down, get out at your own pace, when you’re ready. You’re wasting your time complaining, looking for more money to train etc.
micky jammy delahunty wrote: » Unqualified, depends on what you mean. If the company is more concerned with "people" "skills", and the person has "people" "skills", then they are qualified.
Lucas Hood wrote: » Seems bit mad hiring someone with no background in marketing to run a marketing dept. You can't just learn how the industry works sitting down with someone for a week or 2. I'd be wary of stuff coming back on op if anything went wrong. "well op told me this"
Doterraorange wrote: » .... but i don't want to be upsetting anyone.....?
Odelay wrote: » I thought these appointments had to be advertised? That it is to give everyone an equal opportunity to apply?
victor8600 wrote: » Of course, hiring a sister of the HR representative is just a big no-no. Even if she were a brilliant manager, the standard procedure must be followed.