nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

lbc2019

Some of her posts on twitter lately seem to be off the charts.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

[Deleted User]

The thing about Icke, and all the other nuts is that if they did discover, say, that water did age us prematurely and humans should live to 250, or did something useful and came up with a cure for climate change, for instance, nobody would believe them because of the lizard thing.

The boy who cried wolf is the parable that spring's to mind, and a useful lesson to us all that your reputation is your most important asset, so you must guard it and protect it thoroughly.

Nobelium

A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: »

No, we originated in Africa. I can only imagine what the racist wackos think of that one.

the ones that hate people with white skin, or the ones that hate people with black skin ?

[Deleted User]

Nobelium wrote: »

the ones that hate people with white skin, or the ones that hate people with black skin ?

Don't care.

Nobelium

Charles Ingles wrote: »

It's Charles

i think you're more of a charlie tbh

[Deleted User]

Nobelium wrote: »

i think you're more of a charlie tbh

I think he's more of a chuck.

As in, "chuck everything at the screen, one argument will stick" :pac:

Patty Hearst

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

You don't have to be Icke to know that lots of royal families were interconnected through marriage and a bit of inbreeding. And isn't Mesopotamia pretty much the start of the humanity, so most of us can be traced back to there, royal or not.

But get back to the lizards thing - what's that all about?

There are many people (such as David Icke) who genuinely believe that there are lizards in control of human affairs, but there is an argument to be made that its a codeword for Jews..

Shape Shifting for example, Jews have for many centuries been accused of outwardly adopting the identity of their host nation while privately working for Jewish interests.

There's also the old theories which regarded Europeans as using the 'Mammalian' part of their Brain while Jews were believed to have utilised the 'Reptilian' part of theirs.

Then you have the idea that the Lizards murder and consume children which of course was a long standing accusation about Jews in old Europe.

Lastly the idea that Jews secretly run the world is not new and its pretty much exactly the same as how lizards are believed to secretly run the world.

batgoat

Now Patty, I expect you view such theories as nonsensical theories as awful and unfounded, right? :rolleyes:

[Deleted User]

Nobelium wrote: »

i think you're more of a charlie tbh

On the Charlie?

Patty Hearst

batgoat wrote: »

Now Patty, I expect you view such theories as nonsensical theories as awful and unfounded, right? :rolleyes:

Sigh...I was giving an answer to the Lizard question. It makes sense if you think about it..

Guy:Incognito

Charles Ingles wrote: »

You obviously don't know anything about David icke, his accuracy in predicting world events had seen him fill arenas around the world for eyes.
If you read up on the reasons gadaffi was taken out you might be surprised

Does he only predict those things, with a 100% hit rate? Cos "predicting" hundreds of things and a handful of them coming true isnt very impressive at all.

How come you've moved on to David Icke? What about all the stuff you were going to tell us Gemma was right about? Or is the plan the usual "dump a statement then ignore any questions about proof"?

jeremyj1968

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

Does he only predict those things, with a 100% hit rate?

Icke loses me with the lizard thing. But I'm on board with the royals having princess diana killed. I hate the way he goes on about the numbers, and that rubbish. You know the way. Well JFK died in the 11th month of the year 63, yes, and if you add 63 to 11 you get 74 which if divided by twelve the number of apostles and multiply by four the number of beatles in the The Beatles, you get a big number that some god wrote on a scripture 2000 years ago. A lot of so called conspiracy people talk about numerology but I think that is always the weakest argument.

[Deleted User]

Patty Hearst wrote: »

There are many people (such as David Icke) who genuinely believe that there are lizards in control of human affairs, but there is an argument to be made that its a codeword for Jews..

Shape Shifting for example, Jews have for many centuries been accused of outwardly adopting the identity of their host nation while privately working for Jewish interests.

There's also the old theories which regarded Europeans as using the 'Mammalian' part of their Brain while Jews were believed to have utilised the 'Reptilian' part of theirs.

Then you have the idea that the Lizards murder and consume children which of course was a long standing accusation about Jews in old Europe.

Lastly the idea that Jews secretly run the world is not new and its pretty much exactly the same as how lizards are believed to secretly run the world.

THanks for the insight. I'm sure Charles will be along soon to confirm that he's not in any way anti-semitic, so it's just about the amphibians for him.

jeremyj1968 wrote: »

A lot of so called conspiracy people talk about numerology but I think that is always the weakest argument.

So many choices....

Charles Ingles

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

THanks for the insight. I'm sure Charles will be along soon to confirm that he's not in any way anti-semitic, so it's just about the amphibians for him.

So many choices....

I'm not anti Semitic how dare you.
If you knew how much I defend the Jewish people you wouldn't say that,
It's actually quite hurtful

gman2k

Charles Ingles wrote:

I'm not anti Semitic how dare you. If you knew how much I defend the Jewish people you wouldn't say that, It's actually quite hurtful

Most of the far right conspiracy theories are built off old long standing anti-Semitic myths.
Global elite -check
Controlled central banking system - check
George Soros - check and check.

So your heroes, be they Icke, O'Doherty, Hopkins etc etc are just rehashing old anti-Semitic tropes, now dressed up in modern clothes.

Don't forget, Hitler never personally murdered a Jew, but his rhetoric enabled and gave scope for knuckle draggers to do what they did.
Likewise New Zealand, likewise asylum centre here torched likewise synagogues shot up in America.
O'Doherty and Hopkins might not have actual blood on their hands, but they are responsible for giving space to the murderers who do.

Guy:Incognito

Charles Ingles wrote: »

I'm not anti Semitic how dare you.
If you knew how much I defend the Jewish people you wouldn't say that,
It's actually quite hurtful

So how about all those things Gemma has been right about lately?

skimpydoo

Charles Ingles wrote: »

Mesopotamia all the world's royal families are related and can be traced back to here

Even the Japanese Royal family?

jeremyj1968

Gemma is doing some live streams tonight. Not sure where she is but Mads Palsvig is there too.

skimpydoo

I wonder why she has never appeared on any tv shows to promote her campaign? Is she afraid she will be found out?

jeremyj1968

skimpydoo wrote: »

I wonder why she has never appeared on any tv shows to promote her campaign? Is she afraid she will be found out?

She was in RTE to record a video but they only played one minute of what she said. She spoke about it on her channel. She put adverts on Dublin Bus as well and there was a bit of a story about that when one of the union heads sent out a letter saying that he didn't want her posters on the buses.

Charles Ingles

skimpydoo wrote: »

I wonder why she has never appeared on any tv shows to promote her campaign? Is she afraid she will be found out?

She doesn't need to appear on LAMEstream media she has a great grass roots and people can follow her without the biased filter at Rte

Odhinn

Charles Ingles wrote: »

She doesn't need to appear on LAMEstream media she has a great grass roots and people can follow her without the biased filter at Rte

"root" would be perhaps a better choice of words.

Guy:Incognito

Charles Ingles wrote: »

She doesn't need to appear on LAMEstream media she has a great grass roots and people can follow her without the biased filter at Rte

Maybe one of her followers (you maybe? ) could let us in on the details of all the stuff she has been proven right on lately that one of her followers (oh look, you again) told us about in no detail at all?

gman2k

Charles Ingles wrote:

She doesn't need to appear on LAMEstream media she has a great grass roots and people can follow her without the biased filter at Rte

But O'Doherty was happy to take Denis O'Briens shilling for years without complaint....
Your so called Lame stream media outlets operate with facts, with oversight, with accountability, with knowing who owns them.
None of which can be said for the far right outlets you seem to get your world view from.
Great at gaslighting who is truly a sheeple.

Odhinn

Charles Ingles wrote: »

She doesn't need to appear on LAMEstream media she has a great grass roots and people can follow her without the biased filter at Rte

Why were you always crying on the TV show?

skimpydoo

https://twitter.com/amyohconnor/status/1127253177252892677

Charles Ingles

Odhinn wrote: »

Why were you always crying on the TV show?

Real men can show their softer side

Odhinn

Charles Ingles wrote: »

Real men can show their softer side

Every poxy week?

Guy:Incognito

Charles Ingles wrote: »

Real men can show their softer side

They cant provide evidence to their claims though by the looks of it.......

[Deleted User]

Charles Ingles wrote: »

I'm not anti Semitic how dare you.
If you knew how much I defend the Jewish people you wouldn't say that,
It's actually quite hurtful

I knew you wouldn't let me down. I wasn't suggesting that you were anti semitic at all.

So it's just the lizards for you then?

Ash.J.Williams

Rvsmmnps wrote: »

If Gemma posted about the 3billion the government plan to just about hand over to private interest I could see many hear defend the government.

The David icke fella made some very interesting points on the world we live in and the money we use.He has an interview out on London Real.

The Liberal views here are in full swing.

Welcome to boards