EmmetSpiceland wrote: » dxhound2005 wrote: » The first company named in the OP is Bradys. According to them in the link I posted they are not using reconstituted meat, but meat from single pork muscles. And selling it for two quid a pop? I’d have my doubts. Maybe “pork muscle” could be an industry term for that meat slurry they pack down and slice up for serving?
dxhound2005 wrote: » The first company named in the OP is Bradys. According to them in the link I posted they are not using reconstituted meat, but meat from single pork muscles.
gozunda wrote: » You seem to have a thing for anuses bungholes and slurry in your comments. Perhaps you'd be better attacking the companies directly rather than throwing random ****e and seeing where it comes down?
EmmetSpiceland wrote: » Look lads, maybe you’ve got some connection to the cooked “ham” industry, I dunno, shares in it even. Maybe you just love eating the stuff with a cup of cold beans but you’re not going to convince me that the product they provide is anything other than, very cheap, low grade meat. Hell, maybe you think you’re the ones conning them by getting a packet of their meat product for €2, sure it’s a steal. Either way, you can eat what you like, I’m not going to be fooled by some schmaltzy advertising.
EmmetSpiceland wrote: » Anyone who’s eating that muck thinking it’s some sort of “gourmet” product is deluded. That stuff is sprayed off the pig carcass, swept off the floor and hammered into ham slices. The idea it’s sliced from a pig is laughable.
dxhound2005 wrote: The first company named in the OP is Bradys. According to them in the link I posted they are not using reconstituted meat, but meat from single pork muscles.
Muahahaha wrote: » I know some people dont like fat running through it but wouldnt that be a sign that it was sliced off a single piece of the pig like the leg rather than being some kind of factory pressed reformed ham made from all the innards and entrails?
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » The problem isn't with some butcher who has a licence to slaughter a few pigs a year, that's great. But the bulk of the work, all of the slaughtering by the big farmers is done by only a few abbatoirs. The company my relative occasionally works in slaughters thousands in a day. It takes a lot to shock a vet with twenty-odd years experience of doing slaughterhouse inspections. As a farmer, yoy must know vets who do this work, have a word with them. It's also quite ironic, but not very relevant, that the only vet that ever lays a hand on these pigs is the one that *might* inspect their carcass. There are a tiny number of pig vets in the country, and they deal with whole herds, they don't treat individual pigs. That means bacterial infections and parasites can be rampant before they're detected. It's all quite concerning from a public health viewpoint. Obviously that doesn't apply to someone who is just keeping a few pigs, but they're the extreme minority.
Buford T. Justice V wrote: » I always laugh at the ads suggesting pulled pork to be a premium product. It's mechanically extracted meat off the carcass and reconstituted to resemble normal meat. The joys of advertising, eh? Actually, the exact opposite. The vast majority of pig farms are minimal disease units, where exposure to pathogens from outside the boundaries are strictly prevented. This removes the vast majority of disease pressures from the pigs in that unit. Bacterial and pathogenic infections being rampant is quite funny, in fact. Any person working on a pig unit would have the training and education to spot all the most common and most of the uncommon diseases of pigs at a very early stage. As every stage of their lives are weighed, measured and counted, any deviation from the norm is spotted so early and isolated so quickly that any drop in expected performance is negligible. In fact, from my experience of working on pig farms, the idea that parasites and infections are rampant is positively laughable.
Deleted User wrote: » Thank goodness there’s someone on this thread who knows what they’re talking about. The amount of scaremongering going on here.
Buford T. Justice V wrote: » In fact, from my experience of working on pig farms, the idea that parasites and infections are rampant is positively laughable.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Of course they're not rampant. Obviously it is in a pig farmer's economic interest to take steps to avoid disease spreading into a herd of thousands of pigs. I think you should try reading the post again. I'm talking about risks that are associated with such an intensive farming model. You seem to have worked on a pig farm. Any opinions on the use of anaesthesia?
Buford T. Justice V wrote: » It's always used where required, from my experience.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Wow. That's brazen. OK, you're saying that to convince people who've never been to an industrial-sized farm, and don't know how the rules work around who handles anaesthetic. But there's no victory in knowing you're telling a porkie.
Buford T. Justice V wrote: » Why don't you come out and say what you're implying?
zoe 3619 wrote: » Sheep and cows you see grazing in the fields,but for all the pork that is eaten,when was the last time you saw a herd of pigs frollicking in the sun.
purplepanda wrote: » zoe 3619 wrote: » Sheep and cows you see grazing in the fields,but for all the pork that is eaten,when was the last time you saw a herd of pigs frollicking in the sun. Saw hundreds of pigs living out in the fields beside the Sutton Hoo treasure hoard historical site in Suffolk a couple of years ago. They had wooden sheds as shelter & were having a great time running across the fields, rooting about in the grass & lounging about in the sunshine. My Grandad had a pig farm & used to feed them strawberries, they lived freerange before that was a buzzword. I've stopped eating red meat because most of it is processed crap. Now eating only fish with scales, kosher style but no other seafood such as bottom feeders, crabs, mussles, eels, scrimps. lobsters either.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Buford T. Justice V wrote: » Why don't you come out and say what you're implying? I'm not implying anything. There's no point in trying to respond to really spurious claims about good animal welfare on large pig farms. I'll just repeat what I've been saying already. If anyone is curious, to ask their vet the next time they bring the dog in, or the next time they have a TB test, about their vet's experience of welfare on pig farms. There isn't a vet in this country who hasn't had to work on one, even briefly (although usually as a student) So trust your vet, not the assurances of someone on the Internet.
gozunda wrote: » To be fair Miltiades - you are just "someone on the internet.". Just saying....
_Brian wrote: » Problem in ireland is resentment that a local artisan producer charging 10-20% more for a better product There is a wealth of good food produced on irish farms and small irish processors. Similarly pasture fed beef is far more nutrisious than housed beef which factories and large processors want. We are what we eat, go le..
Oxter wrote: » Where do i buy pasture fed beef? All i see is Irish beef, Certified Angus and Organic. No reference to any of it being pasture fed or fed in a shed on a feed lot Thr same applies to milk coming from intensive dairy farms where the cows never see a field.
Oxter wrote: » Where do i buy pasture fed beef? All i see is Irish beef, Certified Angus and Organic. No reference to any of it being pasture fed or fed in a shed on a feed lotThr same applies to milk coming from intensive dairy farms where the cows never see a field.
Buford T. Justice V wrote: » Well over 90% of Irish milk, and probably closer to 95%+, is from herds where the cows spend the vast majority of their time on pasture. Then they are taken off when the ground conditions deteriorate and before the structure of the soil is compromised by poaching. This is a requirement that land must be maintained in good condition all through the year.