hans aus dtschl wrote: » That sounds totally contradictory to what I was told! I know I'm looking forward to reading CMATS anyway. Thanks, btw.
Corkbiiy wrote: » you see I could be wrong a lot of things are segregated, like theres 2 other plans, north docks and south docks, CMATS very minor in the large scheme of things there is upgrade planned for the glanmire interchange when dunkettle is finished, and maybe the stuff you're on about is in those plans
hans aus dtschl wrote: » Exactly. What I've also been told is that sustainable transport is THE big push in CMATS. New segregated greenways to/from a number of the suburbs. Luas. More bus lanes.
kub wrote: » They will be delighted to know so, in that case, that some other lads are building away mad on their site in Maryborough and have been for the last number of weeks.
snotboogie wrote: » There is work being done on the mound of rubble on Sullivan's Quay. While it is an eyesore and possible health risk it may be bad news for the Events Centre as it was planned for use on site there.
Curb Your Enthusiasm wrote: » Probably too early to know but will Bus Eireann keep their contract to run new services, BRT etc when it's all in place? I imagine LRT may be given to Transdev, similar to Dublin?
Corkbiiy wrote: » let's let the report do the talking https:// i.imgur .com/kH3itA4.png
marno21 wrote: » That's an excellent argument for a motorway M22, M25, M27, M40 North Ring and M71 to provide regional connectivity but not be used to enhance sprawl. For reference, all these roads are already carrying motorway levels of traffic. Trying to strangle them will not work.
Corkbiiy wrote: » I'll let you have a read and see if the planners agree with you! https:// i.imgur. com/p39rfVX.png https:// i.imgur. com/nl9TBZx.png To the poster who talked about grade separation around Amgen site, looks like it's included in this picture
marno21 wrote: » Thank you for that. At least we know now what the Northern Distributor Road is. The lack of N71 improvements is disappointing but it is kind of outside the scope of the CMATS too.
Corkbiiy wrote: » Theres an SDR too, that one is the pipe dream which requires a viaduct there is absolutely no breakdown of costs in this, only final figures for each section (roads, walking/cycling, luas, busconnects) so I doubt we can get all of this done for 3.5bn, or even double it, 7bn, Luas is down as costing 1bn, so the planners must have been smoking some very good hashish when they wrote all this
marno21 wrote: » If they are serious about developing Cork then this all has to be spent. A lot of it is proper no brainer stuff that would easily recoup the investment. I have little faith that the investment will be easily found. Look at the events centre mess and the road network around Cork to see that though. All we can hope for is that having a functional organisation (the NTA) driving this for once some of it might happen.
Corkbiiy wrote: » have a look at this gem, the present value of the investment is only 2.3bn, total return of 5.7bn (3 odd bn profit), you're more than doubling your money.... LOL leprechaun economics right here. https:// i.imgur. com/NxFzgii.png 250% return, this is better than bitcoin
snotboogie wrote: » The demand for travel actually seems relatively conservative, just over a 50% increase on 2011 numbers??
AugustusMinimus wrote: » Corkbiiy. Thanks for all the insider knowledge. I have to ask though. Why are you posting links with gaps in them?
namloc1980 wrote: » The proposed alignment on the map through Bishopstown looks curious. Granted the map lacks detail and it's just an early overview but looks like it runs along the back of CUH and through/close to CSN and Bishopstown GAA club.
Aontachtoir wrote: » It would have to go down Melbourn Road and up Curraheen Road to CUH, no? Don't see any other way to fit it without CPOing and demolishing a lot of houses, which will presumably not happen.
namloc1980 wrote: » Not according to the map. Plus you wouldn't want the tram competing with car traffic on the same road if at all possible otherwise defeats the purpose.
namloc1980 wrote: »
sheff_ wrote: » Will the taxis be blocking the tram lane or the car lane?
kub wrote: » At the rate of when planned changes and projects actually happen in Cork. I have a feeling that many of us will be in the next world or whatever folk believe, by the time any of that stuff happens in reality.
sheff_ wrote: » If you move the entrance of bishopstown comm a bit you could run a corridor up from Melbourne to bishopstown gaa, then run a corridor between the gaa and highfield pitches, then between csn and highfield and you’re through to the hospital grounds. Already an entrance to the hospital from wilton road if you want to avoid cpo-ing any houses there.
MrDerp wrote: » It’s much less disruptive than running all the way down Bishopstown road, and captures a bit more of the population without removing a man artery completely.
MrDerp wrote: » That’s what I was thinking. CPO of highfield top pitch and back of CSN pitches. Then you just run through the perimeter of the hospital grounds but I would CPO 2-4 houses on Wilton road to create a tram only turn from Wilton road, the existing portal is quite narrow. It’s much less disruptive than running all the way down Bishopstown road, and captures a bit more of the population without removing a man artery completely. With a tram covering the 208 corridor from CUH you’d need to reimagine the 205 and 208 routes somewhat. 208 perhaps following the 216 route from CUH to town, 205 turning in CIT itself somewhere instead of looping up Rossa ave, or being replaced by a more frequent Ballincollig service using college road.