cgcsb wrote: » Yes CMATS will do lots for truck movements, by removing a lot of the cars out of their way. CMATS will be quite forceful in it's push for modal shift. Expect a massive reduction in car journeys.
leahyl wrote: » Nobody seems to be talking about the state of the roads we have at present - is there a plan to resurface the lower Glanmire road from Kent Station all the way out to the dunkettle roundabout? It is absolutely shocking. That’s just one example and it happens to be one of the main entrances into the city. I tried looking up plans on the city council website but couldn’t find anything - was it Irish Water that left it the road in this state?
Treviso wrote: » How ironic that Irish Water, funded by Motor tax revenue, was the cause of the state of this road!
cgcsb wrote: » What?
leahyl wrote: » http://https://www.echolive.ie/corknews/Fears-broadband-overspend-could-hit-crucial-project-to-upgrade-Dunkettle-Interchange-56da209f-408a-4c02-9629-a0fe70a60167-ds
cgcsb wrote: » The vast bulk of trips start and end within the urban area and the vast bulk of those are journeys are under 10km long, CMATS will push the most of those journeys onto trams buses and bicycles. Demand management and closing junctions on the N40 will restore it to it's original function as a national road for long distance trips. Overall CMATS will reduce car journeys rather than add more roads. Expect there to be some lip service to CNRR but until the M20 has some shovels in the ground, there won't be any need.
marno21 wrote: » I don't understand this logic. What is now the N40 was built by the council, the part between J3 and J9 anyway, as a distributor road for the south of the city. When it was built the only national road it touched was the N71. Now it has grown up to be the M50's little brother in Cork, forms part of the TEN-T Core network and connects the N8, N22, N25, N27, N28 and N71. But at its core, it still serves the distributor road function for the south of the city. The only junctions that could be remotely considered for closure are J5, J7 or J8 (which isn't even a junction, just one slip). What is the planned closures? The J5 junction has a lot of industry around it
Treviso wrote: » Another overspend, what a surprise. How could they originally estimate that it would only cost between 355 and 512 million, everyone knew that wasn't possible. Now it's at 3 billion!
cgcsb wrote: » Douglas and Tougher can be closed, a tolling system for non HGVs can manage demand couple that with widespread car bans and removal of street parking in the city and this will push a lot of car users onto buses trams and bikes. Most car trips in Cork are pitifully short distance, sustainable modes can hoover up here. CMATS will bring in a greater degree of modal shift than any of the Dublin plans which will only just about keep up with growing demand for public transport services.
ScrubsfanChris wrote: » All three of those sliproads are at capacity during rush hours, and you think they should be closed?
who_me wrote: » Not to shame anyone, or get someone fired. But I'd love to know why they can be so off in their estimates.
Deleted User wrote: » Never minding that they are the off ramps for people coming in from Midleton, Watergrasshill, Macroom etc. Where is that traffic going to go? Public transport in Cork City Centre going to help them? CMATS is for the city, it is not going to do jack for the commuter belt, who never actually go into the city.
cgcsb wrote: » I would agree they should be closed yes, the N40 shouldn't be accommodating to short car commutes.
munstermagic11 wrote: » Thankfully you are not in charge of such decisions.
ScrubsfanChris wrote: » So a road around a city that that you can't get off? Who would use it? What do you consider a short commute? (ie: most car journeys)
ScrubsfanChris wrote: » Why not have the motorway go straight from Cork to Dublin too, f*ck everyone in between :rolleyes:
cgcsb wrote: » There are other exists.
ScrubsfanChris wrote: » That would put thousands more cars down the Rochestown and Frankfield roads, suburban areas. Why remove the the exist in the first place? I don't at all understand your reasoning.
cgcsb wrote: » Demand management, removing the exits means journeys have to be taken on different routes or not at all.
ScrubsfanChris wrote: » There by putting more traffic onto urban streets shared with pedestrians and cyclists?
Demand management and closing junctions on the N40 will restore it to it's original function as a national road for long distance trips.