nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Western Rail Corridor / Rail Trail Discussion

[Deleted User]

Carrying on with the discussion as the other thread is full

https://touch.boards.ie/thread/2055766866/1

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

what_traffic

Lord Glentoran wrote: »

Actually there’s a good idea. A pi55-take on Dublin’s Ayn Randians called “Atlas Shagged”

Does it sound very lyrical in an East Belfast accent Lord Glentoran?

serfboard

Lord Glentoran wrote: »

What is this, the Ayn Rand fan club in the Morket Bor?

Lord Glentoran wrote: »

Actually there’s a good idea.

Good man, you keep praising yourself there :rolleyes:

Lord Glentoran

Lord Glentoran wrote: »

What is this, the Ayn Rand fan club in the Morket Bor? I’ll answer what I like, sonny.

Actually there’s a good idea. A pi55-take on Dublin’s Ayn Randians called “Atlas Shagged”

Lord Glentoran

serfboard wrote: »

Correct. Proper Planning first.

Galway County has a population of 260,000 of which 80,000 live in the city. The other 180,000 are scattered to the four winds from Clifden to Ballinasloe and from Gort to Tuam, and mostly in one-off rural housing of people who do not work on the land.

Until we develop critical mass in our towns and cities in the West of Ireland, rail, a volume form of public transport, which I enthusiastically support where it makes sense, will not be needed, and spending money on it would be a waste.

Preventing it from happening again would be a waste, and a criminal one at that.

Lord Glentoran

serfboard wrote: »

It certainly is not.

But aside from misrepresenting my position, I see that you still haven't answered the question as to whether you support the velorail, and the spending of half a million of public money on it.

What is this, the Ayn Rand fan club in the Morket Bor? I’ll answer what I like, sonny.

serfboard

XPS_Zero wrote: »

We would need to tackle how our population is planned and our planning laws for housing and get rid of the Irish distrust of high rise BEFORE going anywhere near a WRC plan again. They'd literally need to be starting major construction in these areas ^ around the stations BEFORE you will get anyone authorizing the required money.

Correct. Proper Planning first.

Galway County has a population of 260,000 of which 80,000 live in the city. The other 180,000 are scattered to the four winds from Clifden to Ballinasloe and from Gort to Tuam, and mostly in one-off rural housing of people who do not work on the land.

Until we develop critical mass in our towns and cities in the West of Ireland, rail, a volume form of public transport, which I enthusiastically support where it makes sense, will not be needed, and spending money on it would be a waste.

XPS_Zero

blanch152 wrote: »

There shouldn't be commuters travelling to work over long distances. No more rural housing, just build up the cities of Galway, Limerick, Cork and Waterford as well as some of the larger towns as service centres.

Do you remember decentralization?

It started off as the following:
Stop (through planning laws) Dublin moving any further out, up only.

Do the same for Galway, Limerick, Cork.

Have a regional development strategy encouraging new everything to locate in one of those four cities, that way a new WRC or even the reactivated one might have some justification down the road.

BUT THEN....

People started whinging "what about Kerry" and "what about Sligo" and "what about Offally" and off we went, and for political not geospatial reasons it got watered down so it was no longer a regional development plan to rebalance the island and instead became a way to avoid losing votes, or buy votes, in every micky mouse town in Ireland with the public service decentralization spread so thin they eventually realized it wasn't worth fighting the PS Unions over relocation and just gave up.

We would need to tackle how our population is planned and our planning laws for housing and get rid of the Irish distrust of high rise BEFORE going anywhere near a WRC plan again. They'd literally need to be starting major construction in these areas ^ around the stations BEFORE you will get anyone authorizing the required money.

The reason they keep asking for new reports is political, kick the can down the road so don't actually spend the money but say you are in favor of it, the money instead gets spent in Dublin OR more likley on a pointless vote buying extra 10er on childrens allowance or pension or jobseekers.

They won't even finish the Dublin parts of T21 that are crying out to be done because of creaking population, they don't even have the guts to put a stimulus plan building things like metro during the recession included in the bailout, even now they wont' stand up to the NIMBY'ism even though they've the constitutional power to just take the damn land...if they are leaving the Swords corridor creaking demanding Metro, and leaving Green and Red line Luas commuters behind on platforms, why would they spend money on this:
(the line inspection video)

I've worked in emergency planning and the landscape here ^ looks like the kind of projections we had if a nuclear war had gotten going and the fallout was so big in the US it was able to cross the atlantic and large parts of Ireland had to be evacuated, that's how deserted it looks along there.

I'm not against a WRC, but I have the same attitude towards it I do to universal healthcare, you need major reform first, I'd not throw another 6b (full cost on top of what we pay now for an Irish NHS, perfectly doable if you are not attached to said 10ers every budget) at the HSE until it was radically reformed, same here with planning laws etc it would be a waste of money.

serfboard

Lord Glentoran wrote: »

Velorail works elsewhere but not in Ireland is the logic of your position.

It certainly is not.

But aside from misrepresenting my position, I see that you still haven't answered the question as to whether you support the velorail, and the spending of half a million of public money on it.

Sam Russell

marno21 wrote: »

Because the greenway requires the removal of the rails and the end of the dream of rail services to Knock Airport.

But that does not answer the question raised. Why not rubber wheel based Velo bikes?

If there is a sufficient demand for a rail service to Knock Airport, the rails can be reinstated. Remember, there is currently no rail service to Dublin Airport, Shannon Airport, or Cork Airport, all of which have far more passengers and aircraft movements than Knock Airport.

Dublin Airport, with passenger numbers of over 3 million, plus staff numbers, is expected to get a rail connection in 2027. Shannon is expected to get one -- well, it's not expected to get one. As for Cork, ..... well, they are looking for a motorway to Limerick and are not looking for a rail connection currently.

L1011

Supporting the ludicrous velo-rail as a tourism initiative over a Greenway is effectively deciding to artificially limit the number of tourists for the sake of keeping a set of effectively unusable rails on the ground - rails that would be removed before any reopening anyway.

Emotion has long since overridden sense here.

marno21

Sam Russell wrote: »

The velorail will be operating on a one track railway. How do the velo bikes pass each other?

The velo bikes would work just as well with rubber wheels on a greenway, but not just as well, but significantly better. Why do they need to be on rails?

Because the greenway requires the removal of the rails and the end of the dream of rail services to Knock Airport.

Sam Russell

Lord Glentoran wrote: »

Velorail works elsewhere but not in Ireland is the logic of your position. I am reminded of the one track thinking exhibited at a meeting I was at in my old town in Kildare where one public representative was aghast at spending money on a children’s playground for the town, on the basis that “sure the GAA is there”. Zero sum mentality.

The velorail will be operating on a one track railway. How do the velo bikes pass each other?

The velo bikes would work just as well with rubber wheels on a greenway, but not just as well, but significantly better. Why do they need to be on rails?

Lord Glentoran

serfboard wrote: »

So you support spending half a million of the public's finances on the velo-rail simply because it involves rails?

Come on. It's a scandalous waste of money.

Velorail works elsewhere but not in Ireland is the logic of your position. I am reminded of the one track thinking exhibited at a meeting I was at in my old town in Kildare where one public representative was aghast at spending money on a children’s playground for the town, on the basis that “sure the GAA is there”. Zero sum mentality.

serfboard

Lord Glentoran wrote: »

Just not the “wrong” sort of tourism, which is why the anti-rail lobby are targeting Kiltimagh.

So you support spending half a million of the public's finances on the velo-rail simply because it involves rails?

Come on. It's a scandalous waste of money.

Lord Glentoran

westtip wrote: »

And there are votes to be had in creating jobs in the tourism and services industries, which is exactly what the QMG will do.

Just not the “wrong” sort of tourism, which is why the anti-rail lobby are targeting Kiltimagh.

Muckyboots

whisky_galore wrote: »

Bread and circuses for the easily pleased.

The new rubbery sandwiches and Knock Specials.

whisky_galore

Muckyboots wrote: »

Jayney Mac, the candidates in the Galway County Council elections are falling over themselves to declare their love for the greenway. Hardly a signalman's peep about trains at all. Changes afoot.

Bread and circuses for the easily pleased.

westtip

Lord Glentoran wrote: »

There’s votes to be chased in maintaining one house to the acre sprawl, and mosherways to maintain that.

And there are votes to be had in creating jobs in the tourism and services industries, which is exactly what the QMG will do.

Lord Glentoran

Muckyboots wrote: »

Jayney Mac, the candidates in the Galway County Council elections are falling over themselves to declare their love for the greenway. Hardly a signalman's peep about trains at all. Changes afoot.

There’s votes to be chased in maintaining one house to the acre sprawl, and mosherways to maintain that.

Muckyboots

Jayney Mac, the candidates in the Galway County Council elections are falling over themselves to declare their love for the greenway. Hardly a signalman's peep about trains at all. Changes afoot.

Lord Glentoran

Del.Monte wrote: »

Again, you're thinking purely local, why not Limerick/Ennis/Westport etc.....

I'm the first to appreciate the expense involved in putting a railway back in place - especially after it has been systematically run into the ground - but if anything, the existing limited WRC has proved that build it and they will come. CIE had to be dragged screaming before they even started up the limited Ennis/Limerick service back in 1984.

Limerick–Ennis recommenced on Thursdays from 4 August 1984 - two days a week from 12 April 1988, four days a week from 19 February 1993 and six days a week from 16 May 1994. WIKI

CIE never wanted the WRC back and that it has been as 'successful' as it has is a minor miracle given their deplorable attitude.

Bang on the money as ever.

Lord Glentoran

end of the road wrote: »

given it's not open then of course it can't compete with a bus corridor, which i suspect isn't going to do very much for galway's traffic issues in reality.
bus corridors as the solution for a city's traffic issues just isn't going to work long term. galway needs rail-based transport and tuam is a perfect opportunity to reintroduce a rail service as it has an existing rail line.
tuam most certainly isn't a dead duck and would actually not be a bad reopening. no reason why a rail service couldn't compete with a bus corridor.

The Americanism “center” is the telling word there. Galway is a test bed for American-style sprawl and having rail for Tuam-Galway commuting spoils that.

Poop poop!

Sam Russell

marno21 wrote: »

Del.Monte, I do appreciate where you are coming from, but realistically, future rail expansion in Ireland will be totally centered around commuter rail. Upgrading the N17 would be far more useful for that area than reopening the rail line. North of Tuam the alignment is totally uncompetitive with road.

Well, there might be some intercity work, like putting in dual tracking to help intercity flexibility.

marno21

Del.Monte wrote: »

Again, you're thinking purely local, why not Limerick/Ennis/Westport etc.....

I'm the first to appreciate the expense involved in putting a railway back in place - especially after it has been systematically run into the ground - but if anything, the existing limited WRC has proved that build it and they will come. CIE had to be dragged screaming before they even started up the limited Ennis/Limerick service back in 1984.

Limerick–Ennis recommenced on Thursdays from 4 August 1984 - two days a week from 12 April 1988, four days a week from 19 February 1993 and six days a week from 16 May 1994. WIKI

CIE never wanted the WRC back and that it has been as 'successful' as it has is a minor miracle given their deplorable attitude.

Del.Monte, I do appreciate where you are coming from, but realistically, future rail expansion in Ireland will be totally centered around commuter rail. Upgrading the N17 would be far more useful for that area than reopening the rail line. North of Tuam the alignment is totally uncompetitive with road.

[Deleted User]

Commuter services on the Tuam Road into Galway can and do serve big trip generators like Parkmore, GMIT, the city centre and NUIG and serve catchment areas not on the railway like Claregalway and towns further north of Tuam - I use them occasionally.
The rail line is very limited and only serves Tuam and the city centre.

end of the road

Deleted User wrote: »

There are plans to have continuous bus corridors for the problem parts of Tuam to Galway. Once that's done, Tuam to Galway City center will be 30 mins by high frequency bus.

The rail line simply cannot ever compete with that, it just can't.

It's a dead duck, time to convert it to greenway

given it's not open then of course it can't compete with a bus corridor, which i suspect isn't going to do very much for galway's traffic issues in reality.
bus corridors as the solution for a city's traffic issues just isn't going to work long term. galway needs rail-based transport and tuam is a perfect opportunity to reintroduce a rail service as it has an existing rail line.
tuam most certainly isn't a dead duck and would actually not be a bad reopening. no reason why a rail service couldn't compete with a bus corridor.

Del.Monte

marno21 wrote: »

Yes, but the alignment between Tuam and Claremorris is shocking. Is there really going to be substantial demand for Westport/Castlebar - Galway via rail when the competing road journey is improving year by year?

Again, you're thinking purely local, why not Limerick/Ennis/Westport etc.....

I'm the first to appreciate the expense involved in putting a railway back in place - especially after it has been systematically run into the ground - but if anything, the existing limited WRC has proved that build it and they will come. CIE had to be dragged screaming before they even started up the limited Ennis/Limerick service back in 1984.

Limerick–Ennis recommenced on Thursdays from 4 August 1984 - two days a week from 12 April 1988, four days a week from 19 February 1993 and six days a week from 16 May 1994. WIKI

CIE never wanted the WRC back and that it has been as 'successful' as it has is a minor miracle given their deplorable attitude.

marno21

Del.Monte wrote: »

You keep deliberately missing the point that Athenry/Claremorris is part of a through route not just a potential commuter link from Tuam/Galway but that doesn't suit your agenda.

Yes, but the alignment between Tuam and Claremorris is shocking. Is there really going to be substantial demand for Westport/Castlebar - Galway via rail when the competing road journey is improving year by year?

Del.Monte

Deleted User wrote: »

There are plans to have continuous bus corridors for the problem parts of Tuam to Galway. Once that's done, Tuam to Galway City center will be 30 mins by high frequency bus.

The rail line simply cannot ever compete with that, it just can't.

It's a dead duck, time to convert it to greenway

You keep deliberately missing the point that Athenry/Claremorris is part of a through route not just a potential commuter link from Tuam/Galway but that doesn't suit your agenda.

[Deleted User]

There are plans to have continuous bus corridors for the problem parts of Tuam to Galway. Once that's done, Tuam to Galway City center will be 30 mins by high frequency bus.

The rail line simply cannot ever compete with that, it just can't.

It's a dead duck, time to convert it to greenway