Tigerandahalf wrote: » Am I right in that the Hanson's plan only goes as far as 16 miles for the long run. I presume it is thus geared towards people with a solid 2 or 3 year base and towards people who are running a marathon < 9 months from the last 1.
thomas anderson. wrote: » You need to know what it feels like to run 20+ miles, i think not know what its like is mental tbh
Tigerandahalf wrote: » Ya I agree. In my previous marathon I ran upto 24 miles and I felt it helped me greatly on the day. The pain and tiredness in your legs over those last few miles is hard to replicate otherwise.@auldmanking So if 25% you would be running a 64 mile week with that 16 mile long run. Plenty of mileage there in fairness.
shotgunmcos wrote: » I put a summary of it in my log - yes 25% of 64m is 16m. Plus the LR pace is MP-30-40 secs Its all relative. Up to 24m would not just risk injury mid plan but it has a high recovery cost too. Obviously within a 120 mile a week plan that's a different thing but 24m in a 6 day a week 55-70m plan that has 2 other workouts a week is very risky IMO.
Tigerandahalf wrote: » Do you really need 2 workouts a week though for marathon prep? It is not going long that will injure but the faster stuff. It is all relative. I guess once you are running a good volume consistently you have the chance.
Tigerandahalf wrote: » Did you struggle over the last 6?
thomas anderson. wrote: » Its always the V02 or Fartlek workouts, where I pick up my injuries, never the long runs.
Tigerandahalf wrote: » You didn't go very long nor do many of them. Did you struggle over the last 6?
thomas anderson. wrote: » You need to know what it feels like to run 20+ miles, i think not knowing what its like is mental tbh
Duanington wrote: » 18 miles looks longer than most Hansen plan marathoners I've come across. Remember, this is not a typical long run - its at MP-30 secs ( I think?) and is assuming you've built some fatigue in over the course of the plan with the other sessions
yaboya1 wrote: » Probably because you haven't recovered from your 20+m long run
Murph_D wrote: » But anyone who’s run a Marathon before knows what this feels like. Less important after the first time around surely?
shotgunmcos wrote: » Exactly The last 18m I did (at 7:27 pace vs Goal pace 6:55) was on a Sunday after 7 Miles easy Thursday, 14m with 10@ MP Friday and 8 mile easy Saturday. With the residual fatigue from another session that Tuesday etc..
Tigerandahalf wrote: » That is a tough few days. I wonder do these type of plans favour quick recoverers as that 14m on a Friday with another 18m 2 days later is asking a lot. An injury risk? You would really need a good base for that. No harm in looking at different approaches I guess. What sort of pace are you running the easy paceed Thurs/Sat runs at?
Tigerandahalf wrote: » That was the Hansen plan?
shotgunmcos wrote: Yes Hanson Advanced (attached)
Swashbuckler wrote: » Did you rearrange the day off to be on Wednesdays to suit your schedule or was that per original plan? And would moving that day around mess with the overall target of the plan?
shotgunmcos wrote: » Another quick note on the Hansons Long Runs The advance plan prescribed one every 2nd week form week 7 Week 7: 14m@ MP -30secs Week 9: 15m@ MP -30secs Week 11: 16m @MP -30secs Week 13: 16m @MP -30secs Week 15: 16m @MP -30secs What I actually did: Week 7: 14m @ MP -30secs including 2m @MP Week 9: 15m @ MP -30secs Week 12: 14m @ MP -30secs including 2m, 3m, 5m @MP Week 13: 18m @ MP -40secs Week 14: 16m Easy Week 15: 18m @ MP -30secs including last mile @ MP-10secs I missed week 11 due to flu. Put MP effort (HR not pace) into week 12 to see where I was at. Kept week 14 easy as it was between my 2 longest LR weeks. Edit: Just to note, I only spiced up the LRs a little. All other sessions, speed, strength and tempo were as per the plan.
TRR_the_turd wrote: » When you say MP -30 seconds, do you mean -30 seconds over the entire duration of the run or 30 seconds quicker than marathon pace per mile?