molloyjh wrote: » That did no real damage in its first iteration. Which was kind of my point.
awec wrote: » It’s a fantasy show that’s grounded in a medieval type reality. Things that happen are supposed to be believable. The majority of characters are supposed to be normal people, with normal abilities, normal problems etc.
prawnsambo wrote: » molloyjh wrote: » That did no real damage in its first iteration. Which was kind of my point. It required a forced landing and a good bit of amateur surgery. And put herself in grave danger. The existence of effective SAMs was well established. Anybody not reading the spoikers will be scratching their heads at this point.
molloyjh wrote: » How does any of the many faces stuff come even close to "normal abilities"? Or surviving fire unburned? Or making hundreds of swords catch fire by touching one? What about the phantom that killed Stannis' brother?
molloyjh wrote: » It was little more than an irritant though. Basically a thorn but little else. If anything that would give rise to overconfidence. They'd had ages to prepare for her arrival and they couldn't manage anything more than a pin prick.
molloyjh wrote: » How does any of the many faces stuff come even close to "normal abilities"? Or surviving fire unburned? Or making hundreds of swords catch fire by touching one? What about the phantom that killed Stannis' brother? Obviously suspension of disbelief only goes so far, but there is a very real element of nitpicking on some of this stuff. The specific trajectory of missiles is a bit much in a fantasy show tbh. Take it for what it's meant to be and move on. The last couple of seasons haven't been without fault but it's still just a TV show there to be entertaining. And broadly speaking it has been.
molloyjh wrote: » Obviously suspension of disbelief only goes so far, but there is a very real element of nitpicking on some of this stuff. The specific trajectory of missiles is a bit much in a fantasy show tbh. Take it for what it's meant to be and move on. The last couple of seasons haven't been without fault but it's still just a TV show there to be entertaining. And broadly speaking it has been.
prawnsambo wrote: » Suspension of disbelief works quite well in a universe where the rules allow for the existence of dragons, a cult who can magically wear the faces of their victims and zombies that have to be walled away in the frozen wastelands of the north. But inconsistency causes problems for the viewer. It knocks you back into the real world and undermines the contract you make with yourself to accept the fantastical stuff. Internal consistency only works if it's consistent.
thomond2006 wrote: » It's fascinating that a TV show has caused so many of us to care to nitpick.
Zzippy wrote: » I'm not too bothered about the arrows, or Brienne, or any of the minutiae. It's just the timeline is so obviously f*cked in the latest episode - one minute they are at sea (where?) being ambushed, while the northerners are only just mounting up to leave Winterfell, the next they have just washed up ashore but within minutes they're "laying siege" to Kings Landing with a tiny force, not waiting for any support from the north, or the other lords who have pledged support, or the Iron Islands. It was just so rushed. The capture and execution of Missandei was totally glossed over, she was barely an extra without any speaking part. And if Cersei was so ruthless when Tyrion tried to negotiate, why did she not just have the token force outside the walls destroyed? They really are in a rush to wrap up the story which means we have to suspend disbelief wayyy more than usual and accept huge holes in the plot. S8 is going to go down as a poorly-written end to the whole story.
swiwi_ wrote: » Is there something to be said for a dedicated GOT thread? F*ck me but I’d almost prefer a decent bit of gridiron banter.
Squidgy Black wrote: » I fúcking hate Dublin Bus with a passion. Just spent almost an hour waiting for a bus that's supposed to run every 15 minutes.
Stheno wrote: » Do they not have live positions for their busses?
Squidgy Black wrote: » Those real time information displays are useless. 3 of them showed as due and then just disappeared.
awec wrote: »
Podge_irl wrote: » I don't really get the appeal of driving to work. You can do other things while on public transport - get a start on work, watch netflix, post **** on boards. In a car you can listen to the radio and that is about it.
awec wrote: » On the bus you're stuck pressed up against big hairy Walter with his odorous oxters and flatulence.
troyzer wrote: » I can drive to work in 25 minutes. The same journey by bus takes at least an hour. Usually closer to 90 minutes. I'd much rather take public transport for the reasons you say but I can't justify that level of difference.
Podge_irl wrote: » troyzer wrote: » I can drive to work in 25 minutes. The same journey by bus takes at least an hour. Usually closer to 90 minutes. I'd much rather take public transport for the reasons you say but I can't justify that level of difference. Well that's fair enough. I have a feeling that a lot of people take the opposite approach though, where the car ride is longer than the bus. I've only ever lived reasonably close to the city centre on well serviced bus routes and never understood the people I saw getting into their cars in the morning to drive into town. You could easily spend an hour on a trip that the bus would do in 20 mins - even if you have to add a walk on either end it doesn't make much sense.