Patty Hearst wrote: » A bit more research tells me I have to retract my statement...I was wrong. You cannot mention Alex Jones in a positive manner, but you can criticise him.
Patty Hearst wrote: » Are you an Anti Semite or something? Now perhaps Facebook will ban criticism of Israel..that would be very interesting wouldn't it.
Sonics2k wrote: » I think we both know you may need to retract it again. Keep reading. Disapproving of Israeli politics =/= Anti Semitic. But you know that, and you're just panicking in all the other things you've gotten wrong too. For example, I'm not a fan of the Chinese Government and it's policies, but that does not mean I'm racist towards the Chinese people.
Patty Hearst wrote: » Can you read? He said 'Pro Israel' not 'pro Israeli politics' Sounds Anti Semitic to me.
Patty Hearst wrote: » Are you an Anti Semite or something?
After the violent alt-right protest in Charlottesville, Va., a year ago, Mr. Jones announced that he suspected that many of the attendees were actually “leftist Jews” in disguise, there to discredit white supremacists and incite violence. “Literally, they’re just Jewish actors,” he said of the white supremacists. “They all look like Howard Stern.”
mcmoustache wrote: » You must be thinking of Alex Jones. According to the ADL: You might forgive me for thinking that your appeal to anti-semitism isn't in good faith.
mcmoustache wrote: » 20Cent wrote: » She sells stuff to gullible people but think that's where the similarities end. Yeah, I know. I'm doing my best here to find the lefty version of the Alt-Right characters but it's not that easy. There isn't really an analogue as much as they try to elevate the likes of Soros and antifa as being influential in the minds of liberal types.
20Cent wrote: » She sells stuff to gullible people but think that's where the similarities end.
Patty Hearst wrote: » Nice to see Facebook have their priorities straight...
Billy86 wrote: » "You're always the victim, and it's never your fault"
Patty Hearst wrote: » Billy86 wrote: » "You're always the victim, and it's never your fault" What kind of nonsense is that?
Patty Hearst wrote: » But then I guess you find whats happening in the photo acceptable...makes sense
Patty Hearst wrote: » Jones ex wife and therefore his children are Jewish so I doubt somehow that he is Anti Semitic. In fact if you anything at all about him you would know that the biggest criticism of him for many years from the 'Alt Right' is his Pro Israel, Pro Jewish stance. He is also widely regarded to be a 'Mossad disinformation agent' Again anyone with the slightest amount of knowledge about him would know this
batgoat wrote: » Milo had his entire reputation ruined when he said it isn't sexual abuse for an adult to be in a relationship with a thirteen year old...(which it obviously is) So there's a certain irony in what you just posted... Anyway, still got no proof? Shocker!
Patty Hearst wrote: » What kind of nonsense is that? I was making the point about the inconsistencies in what Facebook deems acceptable.
Billy86 wrote: » Its the nonsense mantra of the alt right. Time and time again this is the sentence what the logic behind their arguments can be boiled down to. In this instance: "Poor old PJW, Alex Jones etc are the victims because someone else wasn't banned for something completely different... and it wasn't their fault they repeatedly broke the TOS, because the rules shouldn't apply to them as Facebook is a really big website." Since you'll probably ask me next as what's outery is also really popular, I do not condone that picture and wouldn't have issue with the person who put it up being banned.
Patty Hearst wrote: » Where did I defend Milo? I happen to think he's a degenerate actually. But I do not think he should be banned for his political opinions
Patty Hearst wrote: » Billy86 wrote: » Its the nonsense mantra of the alt right. Time and time again this is the sentence what the logic behind their arguments can be boiled down to. In this instance: "Poor old PJW, Alex Jones etc are the victims because someone else wasn't banned for something completely different... and it wasn't their fault they repeatedly broke the TOS, because the rules shouldn't apply to them as Facebook is a really big website." Since you'll probably ask me next as what's outery is also really popular, I do not condone that picture and wouldn't have issue with the person who put it up being banned. Yes but isn't it a bit strange that the TOS don't address sexual depravity involving children. Or rather that the image I posted is not regarded by Facebook as sexual depravity involving children.
batgoat wrote: » You're attributing it to political opinion. Eg Jones and Paul Joseph Watson actively spread stories that are untrue. They literally make up news. In the case of Jones it resulted in lives being ruined and Watson more often than not pushes a pretty racist agenda. That's pretty reasonable grounds to lob them off the service. Now got any proof of people being banned from Facebook because of positivity about Jones? Go on, prove it!
Patty Hearst wrote: » batgoat wrote: » You're attributing it to political opinion. Eg Jones and Paul Joseph Watson actively spread stories that are untrue. They literally make up news. In the case of Jones it resulted in lives being ruined and Watson more often than not pushes a pretty racist agenda. That's pretty reasonable grounds to lob them off the service. Now got any proof of people being banned from Facebook because of positivity about Jones? Go on, prove it! I've set up a Facebook account and posted loving tributes to Jones. I will report back after a while. We'll see what happens
Patty Hearst wrote: » I've set up a Facebook account and posted loving tributes to Jones. I will report back after a while. We'll see what happens
El_Bee wrote: » they should have thought about that before having illegal opinions.
super_furry wrote: » U okay hun?
