20Cent wrote: » Are there a left wing version of Alex Jones and PJW etc? Have they been banned as well? It seems to me grifters cashing in on ignorance seems to be a mostly right wing phenomenon.
Billy86 wrote: » If i decided to launch a campaign on boards accusing you of being a pedophile and spread it into other social media sites, doxing you (revealing your offline identity) in the process and making everyone in your everyday life know that you are accused of being a pedophile, resulting in you and members of your family receiving daily death threats, your tune would change on that extremely quickly with regards to my boards.ie account (and other social media accounts, and bank account, etc if I were using these to continue to spread these lies about you).
Former Observer wrote: » Being a pedophile is illegal. Being a crisis actor is not, as far as I know.
mcmoustache wrote: » Being a pedo is not illegal.
Former Observer wrote: » My understanding is that he expressed his belief that the shooting was staged and that other people bought into that theory. If I'm the Pope and I encourage people to read the bible does that make me responsible when someone goes on a killing spree citing the word of God? And for those of you of an anti-theist persuasion, there are plenty of secular examples also.
Former Observer wrote: » Surely no more than any other news site/TV channel did.
Former Observer wrote: » But is it libelous? If I believe Elvis Presley is alive but his family disagrees and moreover find the very notion upsetting, surely there is enough space in the world for both opinions.
Former Observer wrote: » Ok. But the accusations against me almost certainyl need to include incriminating (and spurious) evidence. Whichever activity I'm accused of would be illegal. If it's merely the case that you're saying I'm standing outside schools then I'm not sure. Interesting conundrum though. As I've said, I'm happier to live in a world where there are forums where people can discuss unpopular opinions, including those of the crisis actor/staged shooting variety. Where you draw the line and what that line looks like is the question.
Former Observer wrote: » Ok. But the accusations against me would surely need to involve incriminating (and spurious) evidence.
mcmoustache wrote: » His deposition is up there on youtube.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » your attempt at a comparison is just nonsense.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » Is it normal for news sites to repeatedly dox members of the public?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » If i posted publicly that i thought you were a paedophile would that be libelous?
P_1 wrote: » Have to say I'm not a fan of no platforming. Irrespective of how abhorrent you may find someone's opinions its better to leave them in the open and open to public scrutiny and ridicule. As was mentioned in another thread its shït like this that will get the Orange Buffoon reelected in 2020.
ogsjw wrote: » Genuinely incredible watch, the man is as intellectually dishonest as he is cracked. The amount of answers he refused to give, his hack legal team who don't understand basic american law, and the irate lawyer trying to conduct this deposition makes it a hell of a watch.
mcmoustache wrote: » Alex Jones accused the parents of victims of a school shooting of making the whole thing up
mcmoustache wrote: » When they sued, he admitted that he made the whole thing up and blamed it on a psychosis.
Former Observer wrote: » Sure he did. And there are plenty of people out there that still believe it discussing it right now on other forums. Should they all be brought up for libel? I don't understand the significance of this to your argument. I mean, if he stood by his belief and it could be proved that it was sincere and deeply felt what would change for you?
Former Observer wrote: » I don't understand the significance of this to your argument.
scamalert wrote: » every platform have their rules and while in some cases it might seem unfair, not hosting any of that clown ideas should be encouraged. He can go and shout crap while selling his ****ty supplements to those brainwashed on his own site.
mcmoustache wrote: » 20Cent wrote: » Are there a left wing version of Alex Jones and PJW etc? Have they been banned as well? It seems to me grifters cashing in on ignorance seems to be a mostly right wing phenomenon. Louis Farrakhan, the anti-semite and anti-white racist cnut was also banned but you'll notice that the Alex Jones fans ignored him in their whataboutery. It's almost as if this talk of free speech is little more than a smokescreen.
mcmoustache wrote: » Louis Farrakhan, the anti-semite and anti-white racist cnut was also banned but you'll notice that the Alex Jones fans ignored him in their whataboutery. It's almost as if this talk of free speech is little more than a smokescreen.
Patty Hearst wrote: » So it seems that even mentioning Alex Jones name will get a person banned on Facebook. Do people really think thats reasonable?
declan2693 wrote: » Same with saying Tommy Robinson.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » I presume you also have a source that confirms just saying his name will get you banned?
Woodsie1 wrote: » theyre both wrong.you have to say it 3 times like in the movie beetlejuice then you get banned!
declan2693 wrote: » https://twitter.com/OzraeliAvi/status/1121181494389530624
