nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Who has given you the most infractions across the site??

How Soon Is Now

Was just going threw my profile there and decided to have a look threw my list of site Infractions over the years.

Without going into the finer details just yet :P Three different mods warned/banned me at least twice and then there where few others who only loved me a little bit :pac:

So whos the biggest fan of your posts on boards?

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

TCM

JeffKenna wrote:

A good majority of the mods here are overzealous and compensating for their small penis size.

Very true. A little power goes a long way.

begbysback

Bob Harris wrote: »

Ah you're just trying to get me in trouble now.

Not at all, this is the thing, if someone has been infracted by a mod defending by honor then I feel I need to have been insulted first, however I’m not the least bit offended - don’t even know how the term originated, I mean it is possible that some homeless people support the greatest team in the world, and for those poor unfortunates to have to resorted to such, but surely these are in a minority and most wouldn’t be offended by this term?

BarryD2

Received a couple of warnings which were clearly ridiculous:

1. for using the term 'snowflakers'!!! I kid you not.

2. for giving a reference to a type of Irish land use. I picked a random suitable spot on satellite imagery that demonstrated the issue, copied the location in Lat/Long and referenced it in a discussion about land use, so that others could type it into Google and see what I meant. It's called backing up your point, giving proof rather that waffling! This was met with howls about breaches of 'GDPR' and 'invasion of privacy', at which point the thread was zapped. You'd have to laugh, I'm still mystified

GarIT

JoeyTheParrot. They don't like anyone disagreeing with their version of Gay and Trans rights even if you're liberal yourself. Agree with JTP or get banned.

Tacklebox

That's one job I couldn't do is be a moderator Its just as irritating as picking ticks from an energetic whippet in August.

Or trying to catch a mullet in a harbour on a warm summers evening.

A moderator must have great tolerance or lack tolerance.

So much red tape involved in the Internet, to me being a moderator would be a punishment rather than feeling in control or important...

GarIT

Tacklebox wrote: »

That's one job I couldn't do is be a moderator Its just as irritating as picking ticks from an energetic whippet in August.

Or trying to catch a mullet in a harbour on a warm summers evening.

A moderator must have great tolerance or lack tolerance.

So much red tape involved in the Internet, to me being a moderator would be a punishment rather than feeling in control or important...

Job? They do it for free and even compete for the opportunity in many cases.

Wibbs

Boom_Bap wrote: »

it' not the size of the vessel that counts, it's all about the motion in the ocean

Said by men overcompensating and women being kind...

begbysback

GarIT wrote: »

Job? They do it for free and even compete for the opportunity in many cases.

+1 they volunteer so it’s their own fault

Zorya

It's not the moderators I have a problem with (oh okay, there's a one I could give a kick in the hole to) but it's the snitches that better beware of my twitching eye....Just sayin'

The Rape of Lucretia

7 from one mod for this username for example. Another mod who was racking them up took themselves out of the running by issuing a permanent ban from the relevant sub forum. But numbers will depend on whether you are talking about the sum of all user accounts, including closed ones, and/or still active one. There probably is a natural limit to multiple infractions, as it becomes harder and harder to stay alive after a certain point, and so the infraction counter stops with the permanent ban.

jimgoose

Boom_Bap wrote: »

it' not the size of the vessel that counts, it's all about the motion in the ocean

Bigger torpedo moves more ocean. Just sayin', is all like.

Now then, let's see - oooh, three pages of the things, I have been a naughty Goosey, haven't I! Mainly for off-colour smart comments/one-liners. Hey! You fucker Boom, you zapped me back in 2015! :pac:

Tacklebox

GarIT wrote: »

Job? They do it for free and even compete for the opportunity in many cases.

Are you serious?

They compete for the opportunity to be moderators, so it's like that then.

I had a few infractions and banns but I have an idea now of what way to discuss and respond rather than react.

After all boards is where I get a lot of my news as ive no tv and listen to music and YouTube videos mostly.

I have observed the moderation here and I am not at liberty to comment as the mods decision is final.
I learned that the hard way

everlast75

sheesh wrote: »

I got an infraction for saying 'blast it with ****' after we were told not to use that phrase any more. thats it.

Well, you know what to do with that infraction then, doncha!?

Bob Harris

begbysback wrote: »

Not at all, this is the thing, if someone has been infracted by a mod defending by honor then I feel I need to have been insulted first, however I’m not the least bit offended - don’t even know how the term originated, I mean it is possible that some homeless people support the greatest team in the world, and for those poor unfortunates to have to resorted to such, but surely these are in a minority and most wouldn’t be offended by this term?

It was in the football forum, no offensive language allowed. I rarely post there so wasn't used to the rules.

You're right, moderators have to decide what they think you might be offended by. That is a very grey area though in this case they were applying the charter which was fairly cut and dried.

Boom_Bap

jimgoose wrote: »

Bigger torpedo moves more ocean. Just sayin', is all like.

Now then, let's see - oooh, three pages of the things, I have been a naughty Goosey, haven't I! Mainly for off-colour smart comments/one-liners. Hey! You fucker Boom, you zapped me back in 2015! :pac:

Damn right I did :cool:

Boggles

Tacklebox wrote: »

A

After all boards is where I get a lot of my news as ive no tv and listen to music and YouTube videos mostly.

Jaysus! Why not get it from a news site?

jimgoose

Boom_Bap wrote: »

Damn right I did :cool:

You rock. :cool:

Boom_Bap

jimgoose wrote: »

You rock. :cool:

Me Rock

Bob Harris

Boggles wrote: »

Jaysus! Why not get it from a news site?

Boards is a news dump for traveller and social welfare misdemeanours and judges giving out exorbitant awards. What more would you need to know.

RollieFingers

How Soon Is Now wrote: »

Out of everything ive come across on this site in the years ive been on here it always amazes me how important my ****e spelling and grammar is to people :pac:

Its as if each time they think there the very first ones to point it out to me!!

Im aware of it and i couldn't give a ****.

Grammar Nazi's are the worst, ignore them.

BeerWolf

Got 3 infractions in my entire post history on these forums since 2005.

1 for calling someone a bigot.
1 for "minor flaming" said bigot(s).
1 from a deleted thread.

Bad boy I am. :pac:

Tacklebox

Boggles wrote: »

Jaysus! Why not get it from a news site?

Because I get a good laugh out of the opinions here and reactions to the news

SusieBlue

I have 1, for cursing in the Christianity forum. Its tough being a badass, but someone has to do it :pac:

Signore Fancy Pants

SusieBlue wrote: »

I have 1, for cursing in the Christianity forum. Its tough being a badass, but someone has to do it :pac:

Yeah but you were shouting "fcuk me Jesus, fcuk me Jesus."

Ya cant be sayin' that!

Zaph

GarIT wrote: »

Job? They do it for free and even compete for the opportunity in many cases.

No they don't, stop telling porkies. Mods are offered the job based on their posting history, interaction with other posters and general behaviour on the site. They don't know in advance if they are being considered for a modship until it's offered to them.

Church on Tuesday

Got one for calling some condescending cretin an 'imbecile' over a snide remark about my background which I won't tolerate online or IRL.

Tacklebox

Dale Doback wrote: »

Yeah but you were shouting "fcuk me Jesus, fcuk me Jesus."

Ya cant be sayin' that!

Didn't know Linda Blair was on boards

Deebles McBeebles

Zaph wrote: »

No they don't, stop telling porkies. Mods are offered the job based on their posting history, interaction with other posters and general behaviour on the site. They don't know in advance if they are being considered for a modship until it's offered to them.

Ah sh*te. I had hoped you were going to enlighten us on some kind of Hunger Games scenario where the survivor is made a mod.

Zaph

Deebles McBeebles wrote: »

Ah sh*te. I had hoped you were going to enlighten us on some kind of Hunger Games scenario where the survivor is made a mod.

In fairness, that would be much more fun

Boom_Bap

I'd prefer an over the top style royal rumble, winner takes all type competition for being a mod.