Idbatterim wrote: » I agree. But I shouldn’t be paying for those people. These toe rags are obviously not the people we want having kids to pay for future generations. The cost to the state over a life time of one of these sprogs must be collossal. Cost of maternity hospital. Free everything. The only thing they graduate onto is a career in welfare , as encouraged by our government. How much then do those involved in crime, so the legal system, I.e us ? I don’t owe these people a work free living and either do you !
seasidedub wrote: » We don't want to pay for that "celebratory lifestyle" thanks. Her husband is not a high flier. I guarantee you.
Wibbs wrote: » ...than a high flier in a cubicle at 35 looking at the sands running out.
Tabnabs wrote: » Sure ****, why not...
Cordell wrote: » She is a Roma Gypsy originally from Romania. She came to Ireland before Romania joined the EU, so most likely she got asylum status on the basis of alleged discrimination she experienced in Romania, which is complete BS. The real reason was free housing and benefits.
Deja Boo wrote: » jayzus wibbs... seriously?
Plumbthedepths wrote: » She can have 40 kids for all I care once she can provide for them herself instead of the taxpayer footing the bill.
Akrasia wrote: You wouldnt be advocating artificial contraception now would you father?
Plumbthedepths wrote: » No personal responsibility, if you can afford 15 kids be my guest but why should a working couple only able to afford one child be put upon to support someone else's choice?
Kivaro wrote: » I don't know if people in Ireland realise the amount of Roma Gypies arriving into the country. In a town near to me, there is a substantial increase of Roma in the town, and it's not seasonal. They have been given houses by the government/council all over the town. One family was moved into a detached house located in the town's best area. The 1/2 acre with the house is now like a used-car dealership with the amount of cars parked all over the place. On the other side of town, people who have lived on one particular street for generations now cannot park their cars outside their houses because of the car part thefts by the Romas living on that street. Based on what has been experienced in other parts of Europe, issues with Roma Gypsy gangs in Ireland will make the feuds and criminality by our own indigenous ethnic group look like child's play. But why wouldn't they want to come here? The Social Welfare benefits alone is a massive enticement. Then you have the billions of euros currently being spent on free housing, with priority given to those who arrive on our shores with families. And then we have our laughable criminal justice system, or maybe we should call it our criminal injustice system (for crime victims). I remember going to a removal in the town last year and there was a very large crowd waiting to get into the funeral home. Along passes a car with 4 Roma men in it. After seeing the crowd, they stopped the car right in the middle of the road, and started walking down along the line with their hands out begging for money. They would not leave, so the Gardai were called. It was a disgusting experience to witness. So yeah, we are adjusting our culture to suit the arrival of Roma Gypies. But for the likes of Varadkar, Coveney and Zappone, this is a good thing as it helps to destroy the "homogeneity" of the country.
suicide_circus wrote: » no no, she'd be better off a cog in the machine up to her eyes in debt, her only comfort her nightly pinot grigio and canine baby substitute.
Wibbs wrote: » She might be more than content at her large family and her success at raising so many. I'd bet the farm she and women like her are lauded by the men and women of her culture, as they would be in many cultures. That tends to beget contentment.
Mrsmum wrote: » That's going from one extreme to another. There's a happy medium. Women of Ireland who were so content with huge families and being lauded for it that they stopped having said big families immediately once they could control their fertility. Imagine that.
Emme wrote: » Of course it does. Men in those cultures take responsibility for their offspring and want to commit to women at an age when they can have children. Men in those countries want to be fathers at an age when they will be able to play football with their children later on. Men in those cultures don't see women as golddiggers if they want to have children and mind them themselves instead of going out to work. These women don't have to choose between childlessness or settling for a man 20 years older whose nappies she will have to change once she has taken the last nappy off the youngest. Men in those cultures don't make fun of working childless women their age while finally deciding to settle down around 45 or 50 with a woman 20 years their junior and walking around like a dog with 2 m!ckeys when she has a child for them.
suicide_circus wrote: » yikes!
Wibbs wrote: » Though it seems a raw nerve has been hit, I would somewhat agree with you TBH.
Emme wrote: » It's like this. A certain cohort of men on Boards lose no opportunity to bash women of a certain age who are single and have no children without looking into the mirror and seeing how they or their contemporaries might have inadvertently contributed to the situation.
suicide_circus wrote: a welfare state is a finely balanced ecosystem
Beechwoodspark wrote: » the day is soon coming where countries will just say freedom of movement is over and borders are back. Doubt veruca will ever have the cajones to do it tho