roadmaster wrote: » Will the actually put up electric cables to maynooth or is this where the bimode trains come in ?
Sam Russell wrote: » I believe the plan is to O/H wire as far as Maynooth and Drogheda. Bimode trains might be a temporary measure.
MJohnston wrote: » I guess it wasn't clear to you that I was entirely joking about sueing, but fine! If you continually submit an idea to public consultations, it would be completely idiotic to believe you retain any ownership over that idea.
Ireland trains wrote: » Id say the new dart fleet will have toilets because if a dart is going from drogheda tp greystones thats a 2 hour journey
LeinsterDub wrote: » Very few people will do that journey. If you need to go you can use the toilets at the station and get the next train. Journeys on the tube can be over 2 hours and they don't have toilets
loyatemu wrote: » what toilet at the station?
marno21 wrote: » By the way for reference, the total lengths of the sections are as follows: * 40km Maynooth/M3 Parkway-Connolly/Docklands incl. connecting to Phoenix Park Tunnel * 20km Hazelhatch-Phoenix Park Tunnel/Heuston (this will also include quad tracking of Parkwest-Heuston) * 37km Malahide-Drogheda
cgcsb wrote: » When you look at it like that, 100km of electrification is quite a big job.
Sam Russell wrote: » Is that 100 km of two track wire? I assume it is. What is the likly cost?
marno21 wrote: » It's unclear yet whether they will just electrify two tracks between Heuston and Parkwest or all 4 as part of a wider electrification strategy but we'll say 2 tracks for the moment, so yes 100km of two track wire + whatever approaches to Heuston and from Glasnevin Junction in need to be done. I saw electrification costed at approx. €500k per km previously. Open to correction on that.
medoc wrote: » Does it include electrification of the Phoenix Park Tunnel?
LeinsterDub wrote: » I heard somewhere it too low to electrify part of the reason they need hybrids.
LeinsterDub wrote: » They'll have to be provided
marno21 wrote: » * 20km Hazelhatch-Phoenix Park Tunnel/Heuston (this will also include quad tracking of Parkwest-Heuston)
marno21 wrote: » * 40km Maynooth/M3 Parkway-Connolly/Docklands incl. connecting to Phoenix Park Tunnel
Rulmeq wrote: » That's the second time I've seen you post this, do you konw if they have published the plans for the quad-tracking the few km that's left? I'd love to know what their plans for the pinch points are.
highdef wrote: » Interesting.... Can you provide sources for this information, please?
cgcsb wrote: » It'll mean closing of some lanes of the N4
highdef wrote: » Permanent or temporary? N4/Chapelizod Bypass is already above capacity a lot of the time and there are thousands of houses being built along the M4 corridor so it's not going to get any better.
Ireland trains wrote: » I think they should just quad track to kildare while there at it. The quad track park west to heuston was included in the design tender
SeanW wrote: » 1) They'd divide each trainset in half - a passenger could not walk from one half of the trainset to the other because the diesel generator car would be inaccessible to passengers. So for an 8 car train, instead of being divided by 2, 4 cars like the 29000s or some of the newer DARTs (or even the 3/4 car ICRs), a FLIRT train would be divided by 4.
cgcsb wrote: » That seems good value no? That'd be all of Dublin-cork for €150mil? Would have assumed such a project would run into billions