pa990 wrote: » Yes, they all should have guns, but most wont want them.
bubblypop wrote: » Rubbish.
Tomas81 wrote: » He had left a cinema with his partner which has been proven he was having sex in the car like a kids do and this happened.
punisher5112 wrote: » The lad was/is a criminal though and didn't follow a lawful order.....
Tomas81 wrote: » https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.independent.ie/irish-news/man-shot-during-struggle-with-offduty-garda-is-the-son-of-gangland-murder-victim-36065062.html
pale rider wrote: » I had occasion to call the guards when I had two men whispering at the rear of my house in the wee hours in my enclosed garden, they walked on gravel which alerted me, the guards were with me in minutes. They are very stretched but far as I know respond to all calls in the same way regardless.
Andrew00 wrote: » When there's 3 armed scum raiding your home at 2am and you call the guards they're terrified to come out. They take up to an hour to come to the scene
Gerry G wrote: No I'm not in the force .
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Where the Mc came from I don't know, but his sister and mother were vilified by the guards and the FBI investigation was a tad more critical of the guards than you are suggesting. The final part of your comment speaks to me of your agenda. I hope you are not in the force or have any connection to it.
Gerry G wrote: I'm also familiar with the case. A highly experienced FBI investigator found that the biggest mistake the guards made was that they allowed the standoff to carry on for too long and that and that John Carty should have been shot sooner. As for the Mc Carthy family you're talking about, I don't know who they are but I do know that John Cartys extended family were looking for money from the state after the whole thing. I'm sure they got what they were looking for
Plumbthedepths wrote: » The logic I am using here is I'm familiar with the Abbeylara incident and the subsequent treatment of the McCarthy family by the guards which leads me to believe it was a monumental f**k up. I suggest you learn the responsibility of making a claim and the fact you will be asked to back it up which you have failed to do.
Gerry G wrote: What logic are you using here?
Plumbthedepths wrote: » You claimed it wasn't a f**k up, onus is on you to back up your claim.
Gerry G wrote: Explain to me why it was. A deranged man was firing shots at Guards and Garda cars. What should they have done, read him a bed time story?
Tomas81 wrote: » 3 Garda were sacked. Armed Garda for John Morris was sacked fact, I sat in the court when the Commisioner stated it. Read my posts you will see why. Garda has been suspended without pay in the Portobello issue and won't be ruled lawful guy had just left swan cinema and was shot, Shane Thomas was the injured man's name.
NaFirinne wrote: » Why not be like America and have everyone that wants to be armed - be armed. Then we won't need guards we can just protect ourselves.
Tomas81 wrote: » So portobello bridge when the garda took a man from his car after a cinema date with his partner accused him of an armed robbery then shot him? Was that not a balls up hahaha. John Morris unarmed burgling a building shot dead, that ok also. The Garda in Longford shot a man and a dog while under no threat hahaha 3 Garda sacked in those incidents but your saying it was fine. Hahaha And I'm from Northern Ireland originally well versed in the RUC and PSNI. AGS are worse.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Can you explain why you don't think Abbeylara was a f**k up?
bubblypop wrote: » Lol. Right so, now I know you haven't a breeze what you are talking about! I can ignore your rubbish from now on.
Tomas81 wrote: » No he's not at work. Maurice o Sullivan was his name he's off
bubblypop wrote: » Sorry, you are wrong. Nobody was sacked & that Garda from portobello incident is very much still at work. Doesn't matter where the guy was coming from.